General Electoral Trust v. ITO

81 Taxmann.com 276Reported decision2017#25700 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 346,713 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Sections most often in play

Section 142(1)Section 144 Section 147 Section 148 Section 148A Section 151 Section 10(23C)Section 11

Issues it is cited on

reason to believe reopening of assessment notice under section 148 section 139(1)section 148 section 147 prescribed person section 14 india nfac total income

Judgments citing General Electoral Trust v. ITO

Shri Gandhi Maulana Azad Shramjivi Ashra, Kutch vs. Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 1, Rajkot

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 612/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 611 & 612/RJT/2025 Assessment Year: (2016-17 to 2017-18) Shri Gandhi Maulana Azad Vs. The ITO (Exemption), wd – 1, Shramjivi Ashra Rajkot - 360001 Gorevali Bhuj, Kutch – 370510 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAATG8071B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 11/12/2025 Date of Pronouncement : 10/03/2026 आदेश / ORDER Per, Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinh…

Shri Gandhi Maulana Azad Shramjivi Ashra, Kutch vs. Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 1, Rajkot

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 611/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

Chandan Raltors P Ltd., Mumbai vs. ITO-14(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly

ITA 761/MUM/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Feb 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JM I.T.A. No.761/Mum/2021 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Chandan Raltors P. Ltd. 102, Parekh Building N.G. Acharya Marg, Chembur, Mumbai, Maharashtra. PAN:[AACCC1129M] (Appellant) Vs. ITO, 14(1)(1), Mumbai. (Respondent) Appellant by Respondent by Sh. Kirit Sheth, AR Ms. Pradnya Gholap, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement 03.12.2024 18.02.2025 ORDER Per: Smt. Beena Pillai, J.M.: Present appeal arises out of order dated 03.03.2021 passed by NFAC, Delhi, for assessment year 2010-11 on the following revised grounds of appeal: “1.…