Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI

73 Taxmann.com 252High Court2016#15 most cited

What is Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI authority for?

Late fees under section 234E are not applicable for periods prior to June 1, 2015, as the amendment to section 200A inserting clause (c) was effective from that date.

1,778

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,368 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI · section 234E · section 200A · late fees · TDS returns · prior to June 1 2015 · amendment · Karnataka High Court

Sections most often in play

Section 234ESection 200ASection 154Section 250Section 156Section 220(2)Section 200(3)Section 271H

Issues it is cited on

section 200(3)section 220section 220(2)mistake apparent on recordsection 234esection 200asection 200a(1)(c)section 200section 200a(1)tax collected at sourcetax deducted at sourcesection 206c

Judgments citing Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Ghughari Tand Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 67/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Simri Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 66/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Simri Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 65/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Ro Bhabhua Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 64/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Fatehpurmor Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 63/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Behiya Bazar Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 62/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Gilani Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 61/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Bachari Narayanpur Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 60/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Basudhar Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 59/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Dhansoin Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 58/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Nawada Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 57/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Ro Aurangabad Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 56/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Sirhirachand Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 55/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Kathautia Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 544/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Kathautia Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 543/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Kathautia Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 542/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Katwadia Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 541/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Katwadia Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 540/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Simri Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 54/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Katwadia Branch vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 539/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Vs. Unwas Branch Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Robhabhua Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Fatehpur Mor Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ce with the provisions of section 234E of the Act. ITA Nos.-34 to 176, 184 to 190 & 529 to 554/Pat/2022 4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with effect from 01.06.2015 and that the demand of fees u/s 234E of the Act prior to 01.06.2015 cannot be made since there was no enabling provision of section 200A of the Act for raising…