Experion Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT

115 Taxmann.com 338High Court2020#3840 most cited

What is Experion Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Approval for reassessment proceedings under Section 151 requires the sanctioning authority to be satisfied with the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer, but does not necessitate elaborate reasoning. The sanctioning authority exercises a mechanical approval if satisfied.

31

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Experion Developers · Section 151 · sanctioning authority · approval · mechanical approval · non application of mind · borrowed satisfaction · reasons recorded · income escaping assessment

Sections most often in play

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 143(3)Section 68Section 144BSection 142(1)Section 145(3)

Issues it is cited on

sanctioning authoritysection 151(1)non application of mindmaterial facts necessary for assessmentborrowed satisfactionmere change of opinionchange of opinionentry operatorincome escaping assessmentkelvinatorescapement of incometangible material

Judgments citing Experion Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT

Optimist Electronics P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-19(2), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as indicated above

ITA 4907/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad, S.M.C.

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar GuptaFor Respondent: Sr. D. R
Section 147Section 148Section 271Section 68Section 69C

…I.T.A. No. 4908/Del/2018 AND I.T.A. No. 4907/Del/2018 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCH “S.M.C.” NEW DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER, S.M.C. आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.4908/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year : 2007-08 Shyam Products Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax Officer, बनाम 206 – Hans Bhawan, Ward : 23 (3) Vs. 1, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 001. PAN : AADCS0943E A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No.4907/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year : 2008-09 Optimist Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax Officer, बनाम 206 – Hans Bhawan, Ward : 19 (2) Vs. 1, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, N…

Wachovia Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-27(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 847/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi

For Appellant: Shri Piyush Kaushik, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “SMC” : DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.No.847/Del./2020 Assessment Year 2011-12 Wachovia Marketing Pvt. Income Tax Officer Ltd., Plot No.55, Industrial Ward – 27(2), [vs. Area, Patparganj, New Delhi Delhi – 110 092 PAN : AAACW 9538 L (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Piyush Kaushik, Adv. For Revenue : Shri Om Prakash, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 16.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 31.08.2022 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, A.M. This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal…

DCIT CC-5(1), Mumbai vs. Archive Realty Developers Limited, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and cross objection filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 456/MUM/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Bledcit, Central Circle – 5(1) V. M/S. Archive Realty Developers Ltd., Room No. 1928, 19Th Floor 324, Master Mind-Iv, Royal Palms Air India Building Aarey Milk Colony, Goregaon (E) Nariman Point Mumbai - 400065 Mumbai – 400 021 Pan: Aagca5488D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Smt. Shailja Rai
Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER DCIT, Central Circle – 5(1) v. M/s. Archive Realty Developers Ltd., Room No. 1928, 19th Floor 324, Master Mind-IV, Royal Palms Air India Building Aarey Milk Colony, Goregaon (E) Nariman Point Mumbai - 400065 Mumbai – 400 021 PAN: AAGCA5488D (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 180/Mum/2018 [ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 456/MUM/2018 (A.Y: 2008-09)] M/s. Archive Realty Developers Ltd., v. DCIT, Central Circle – 5(1) 324, Master Mind-IV, Royal Palms Room No. 1…

Krishna Devi, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 38(3), New Delhi

ITA 6356/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6356/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Krishna Devi, Vs Income Tax Officer, F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, Ward-38(3), New Delhi-110085 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Abrpd0875E Assessee By : Sh. Kapil Goel, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Umesh Takyar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 08.10.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 04.01.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Umesh Takyar, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Amit Shukla, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 6356/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Krishna Devi, Vs Income Tax Officer, F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, Ward-38(3), New Delhi-110085 New Delhi-110002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. ABRPD0875E Assessee by : Sh. Kapil Goel, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Umesh Takyar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 08.10.2021 Date of Pronouncement: 04.01.2022 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-13, New Delh…

Gajendra Kumar, Ghaziabad vs. ITO, Ward- 1(2), Ghaziabad

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 608/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Nov 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing) Gajendra Kumar, Vs. Ito, C/O. M/S. Sanjeev Anand & Associates, Ward-1(2), 77, Navyug Market, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad Pan:Bwgpg2614B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Somil Agarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Yakyar, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Through Video Conferencing) Gajendra Kumar, Vs. ITO, C/o. M/s. Sanjeev Anand & Associates, Ward-1(2), 77, Navyug Market, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad PAN:BWGPG2614B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Somil Agarwal, Adv Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv Revenue by: Shri Umesh Yakyar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 20/10/2021 Date of pronouncement 18/11/2021 O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M. 1. This appeal is field by the assessee against the order passed by the ld CIT(A)-2, Noida da…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Maharaji Education Trust, Ghaziabad

The appeal are dismissed

ITA 5138/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, C. AFor Respondent: Ms. Paramita M. Biswas[CIT]–
Section 11Section 12ASection 132Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69Section 69C

…isfied that it is a fit case for issue of notice u/s 148 of the IT act.” Is invalid. We find that this issue is squarely covered against the assessee by the decision of the honourable Delhi High Court in case of Experion developers private limited versus ACIT 422 ITR 355 (Del) wherein it has been held as Under:- “(d) Whether proper sanction as required under section 151 of the Act was obtained or not ? 40. It is a requirement for issuance of notice for reopening of assessment proceedings under section 151 of the Act that the Principal Chief Page No : 0386 Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissio…

Treta E Technologies Company Pvt Ltd, Gurgaon vs. ACIT Circle-25(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 9734/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Vijay Pal Raoआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.9734/Del/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 बनाम Treta E Technologies Company Pvt. Ltd. Acit Ca M.R. Sahu, M Sahu & Associates, Ca Vs. Circle 25(2) H.No. 651, Ff, Sector-10A, Room No. 196A, Near Meenakshi Public School, C.R. Building, Gurgaon, Haryana. New Delhi. Pan No. Aadct1733B अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 147Section 148Section 151

…He has further contended that the satisfaction of Pr. CIT is not require to be in elaborate words in support of his contention he has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of E-X Seed Technologies & Device Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT 422 ITR 355. Thus, the Ld. DR has submitted that while granting sanction u/s 151 the Pr. CIT was not required to provide elaborate reasoning to arrive at the finding of approval when he was satisfied with the reasons of reopening recorded by the Assessing Officer. He has pointed out that the assessee is a non filer of Income Tax Return and only on the bas…

Essar Capital Ltd, Mumbai vs. Pr CIT 6, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3759/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jan 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negiassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Vajresh Consultants Prcit 6, Ltd. (Earlier Known As Aayakar Bhavan, Essar Capital Ltd.), Mumbai - 400020 Vs. 40-B, Ridge Road, Malabar Hill, Mumbai – 400 006 Pan: Aabce 7257R (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Nishant Thakkar, A.R. & Shri Hiten Chande, A.R. Revenue By : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 23.10.2020 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.01.2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Thakkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Vajresh Consultants PrCIT 6, Ltd. (Earlier known as Aayakar Bhavan, Essar Capital Ltd.), Mumbai - 400020 Vs. 40-B, Ridge Road, Malabar Hill, Mumbai – 400 006 PAN: AABCE 7257R (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Nishant Thakkar, A.R. & Shri Hiten Chande, A.R. Revenue by : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, D.R. Date of Hearing : 23.10.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 08.01.2021 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member: The p…

ITO 15 (2)(2), Mumbai vs. M/S Limbo Engineering P Ltd., Mumbai

In the result the all the three appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 7277/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negiassessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Neel Khandelwal &For Respondent: Dr Rajeev Harit&Shri J. Micheal, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2011-12 Income Tax Officer- M/s. Limbo Engineering 15(2)(1), P. Ltd., Room No.357, B-60/B, Stations Plaza, 3rd Flr, Vs. Station Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Bhandup (W), M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 078 Marine Lines, PAN: AABCL 9224B Mumbai - 400020 (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos.7276 & 7277/M/2019 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Income Tax Officer- M/s. Limbo Engineering 15(2)(2), P. Ltd., R.No.15B, Gr. Flr, B-60/B, Stations Plaza, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan,…

DCIT Central Circle-7(4), Mumbai vs. M/S Wellknown Polysters Ltd., Mumbai

In the result the all the three appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1388/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Oct 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negiassessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Neel Khandelwal &For Respondent: Dr Rajeev Harit&Shri J. Micheal, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2011-12 Income Tax Officer- M/s. Limbo Engineering 15(2)(1), P. Ltd., Room No.357, B-60/B, Stations Plaza, 3rd Flr, Vs. Station Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Bhandup (W), M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 078 Marine Lines, PAN: AABCL 9224B Mumbai - 400020 (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos.7276 & 7277/M/2019 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Income Tax Officer- M/s. Limbo Engineering 15(2)(2), P. Ltd., R.No.15B, Gr. Flr, B-60/B, Stations Plaza, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan,…

ITO 15 (2)(2), Mumbai vs. M/S Limbo Engineering P Ltd., Mumbai

In the result the all the three appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 7276/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negiassessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Neel Khandelwal &For Respondent: Dr Rajeev Harit&Shri J. Micheal, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2011-12 Income Tax Officer- M/s. Limbo Engineering 15(2)(1), P. Ltd., Room No.357, B-60/B, Stations Plaza, 3rd Flr, Vs. Station Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Bhandup (W), M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 078 Marine Lines, PAN: AABCL 9224B Mumbai - 400020 (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos.7276 & 7277/M/2019 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Income Tax Officer- M/s. Limbo Engineering 15(2)(2), P. Ltd., R.No.15B, Gr. Flr, B-60/B, Stations Plaza, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan,…