What is Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

An employer's delayed remittance of employees' contributions to provident fund (PF) or Employees' State Insurance (ESI) is deductible if the payment is made before the due date for filing the income tax return under section 139(1), applying the provisions of section 43B and notwithstanding section 36(1)(va).

How many judgments cite Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT?

519 judgments on BharatTax cite Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (366 ITR 408), spanning 2016 to 2026.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 36(1)(va), Section 234B, Section 234C, Section 143(1), Section 143(1)(a), Section 43B.

Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (366 ITR 408)

Babian Inn, Lucknow vs. ACIT, Range-I, Lucknow

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 85/LKW/2021[2018-2019]Status: HeardITAT Lucknow04 Aug 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…the view taken in the earlier judgments and follow the view taken by Gujrat High Court in Commissioner of IncomeTax Vs Gujrat State Road Transport Corporation (supra) and this occasion came in Essae Teraoka P. Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of IncomeTax, (2014) 366 ITR 408. Dispute relates to A.Y. 200809. Assessee filed Return on 26.09.2008. Return was processed under Section 143(1) and thereafter on scrutiny, notice under Section 143(2) was issued. Assessing Officer completed assessment by order dated 24.12.2010 under I.T.A. No.85/Lkw/2021 Assessment year: 2018-19 7 Section 143(3) disallowing Rs. 12,51,737/ under…

Rajan Banquet Pvt.Ltd., Moradabad vs. ACIT-1, Moradabad

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1427/DEL/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Aug 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…view taken in the earlier judgments and follow the view taken by Gujarat High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (supra) and this occasion came in Essae Teraoka P. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income- Tax, (2014) 366 ITR 408. Dispute relates to A.Y. 200809. Assessee filed Return on 26.09.2008. Return was processed under Section 143(1) and thereafter on scrutiny, notice under Section 143(2) was issued. Assessing Officer completed assessment by order dated 24.12.2010 under Section 143(3) disallowing Rs. 12,51,737/under Section 36(1)(va) and also disallowing Rs. 1,04,62…

Bellur Hiriyaniah Sridhar Murthy, Bangalore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 544/BANG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: None

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 30Section 32Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 41Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos. 543 & 544/Bang/2022 Assessment Years : 2018-19 & 2019-20 Shri Bellur Hiriyaniah Sridhar Murthy, The Income Tax No. 65, East Anjaneya Officer, Temple Street, Ward 5 (2)(1), Basavanagudi, Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 004. Vs. PAN: AIZPS3972L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : None : Shri Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT Revenue by DR ITAT Date of Hearing : 03-08-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 03-08-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeals by the assessee has…

Bellur Hiriyaniah Sridhar Murthy, Bangalore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 543/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: None

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 30Section 32Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 41Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos. 543 & 544/Bang/2022 Assessment Years : 2018-19 & 2019-20 Shri Bellur Hiriyaniah Sridhar Murthy, The Income Tax No. 65, East Anjaneya Officer, Temple Street, Ward 5 (2)(1), Basavanagudi, Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 004. Vs. PAN: AIZPS3972L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : None : Shri Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT Revenue by DR ITAT Date of Hearing : 03-08-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 03-08-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeals by the assessee has…

People Management Services, Mysuru vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 541/BANG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Bhargava, S.NFor Respondent: Shri K.R Narayan, Addl. CIT (DR)

Section 139(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…which is placed on record. He further submitted that the amendment made in the Finance Act 2021 is prospective in nature. He also relied on the judgment of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Essae Page 3 of 6 Teraoka Pvt. Ltd., Vs. DCIT [2014] 366 ITR 408/222 Taxman 170/32 taxmann.com 33 (Kar). 4. On the other hand, the ld.DR supported the order of the lower authorities and he vehemently submitted that there was clear provision in the Income-tax Act u/s 36(1)(va) in this regard. Once the assessee received the employees contribution firstly it is created as income of the assessee u/s 2(24)(x) and…

Datacorp Traffic Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Bangalore

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 532/BANG/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Aug 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: NONEFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh K., D.R

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…he material on record. Admittedly, the assessee has remitted the employees' contribution to ESI before the due date for filing of return u/s 139(1) of the I.T.Act. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of EssaeTeraoka (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT reported in 366 ITR 408 (Kar.) has categorically held that the assessee would be entitled to deduction of employees' contribution to ESI provided the payment was made prior to the due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the I.T.Act. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court differed with the judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT v. Gujar…

Teamlease Services Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 530/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Teamlease Services Ltd., The Assistant 6Th Floor, Bmtc Director Of Commercial Complex, Income Tax, 80 Feet Road, Cpc, Koramangala, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 095. Pan: Aabct5458K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None : Shri K.R. Narayana, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 02-08-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 02-08-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 27/09/2021 U/S. 250 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19 On Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: None

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

…the due datesRs.6,27,656 specified in the respective Act but before the due date for filing the return u/s 139(1). The CPC and ld.CIT(A) have not followed the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Essae Teraoka (P) Ltd. v. DCIT 11(3) (366 ITR 408) and 2. Spectrum Consultants India (P) Ltd. v.CIT (215 Taxmann.597) to allow employee contribution paid before filing of income tax returns The CPC and Ld.CIT(A) have not appreciated the fact that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) is prospective in nature. The memorandum explaining the provision 3. of Finance Bill, 2021 clearly states that the a…

Shahi Electricals, Bengaluru vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 528/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Sairam, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Priyadarshini Baseganni, Addl.CIT-DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…n of employees’ contribution to PF and ESI having regard to the provisions of section 43B of the I.T.Act. In this context, the assessee relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT, reported in 366 ITR 408 (Kar.). The CIT(A), however, rejected the appeal of the assessee. The CIT(A) noticed the difference 4 ITA No.528/Bang/2022. M/s.Shahi Electricals. between employer and employee contribution to PF and ESI and held that only employers contribution to PF and ESI is entitled to deduction u/s 43B of the I.T.Act, if the same is paid prior to due date…

Park View Service Station, Bengaluru vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 527/BANG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Sairam V, C.AFor Respondent: Shri K.R Narayan, Addl. CIT (DR)

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…re the CIT(A) which is placed on record. He further submitted that the amendment made in the Finance Act 2021 is prospective in nature. He also relied on the judgment of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd., Vs. DCIT [2014] 366 ITR 408/222 Taxman 170/32 taxmann.com 33 (Kar). Page 4 of 7 4. On the other hand, the ld.DR supported the order of the lower authorities and he vehemently submitted that there was clear provision in the Income-tax Act u/s 36(1)(va) in this regard. Once the assessee received the employees contribution firstly it is created as income of the assessee u/s 2…

Expat Engineering India Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 503/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice Preseident & Shri Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri Rajgopal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Baseganni

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 43B

…material on record. Admittedly, the assessee has remitted the employees' contribution to ESI before the due date for filing of return u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Essae Teraoka (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT reported in 366 ITR 408 (Kar.) has categorically held that the assessee would be entitled to deduction of employees' contribution to ESI provided the payment was made prior to the due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court differed with the judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT v. Guja…