Enterprises v. CIT

288 ITR 396High Court#20312 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,631 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2018.

Judgments citing Enterprises v. CIT

Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd, Jhansi vs. DCIT -2(3)(1), Jhansi

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed

ITA 193/AGR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 44A

…in ITA No.2078/Ahd/2006 & 2526/Ahd/206. “M/s K.P. Madhusudan vs. CIT”, Civil Appeal (d) No. 6465/2000 (SC). “CIT vs. Zoom Communications Pvt. Ltd.”, ITA (e) No.07/2010(Del) (H.C.). “Shyam Biri Works”, 259 ITR 625 (All. H.C.). (f) “Sangam Enterprises vs. CIT”, 288 ITR 396 (All). (g) “Harish Hosiery Mart”, ITAT, Ahmedabad. (h) “Arcotech”, (Del) (H.C.). (i) “B.A. Balasubramanian & Bros.”, 20 Taxman 215 (j) (Mad). “Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation vs. (k) DCIT” ITA No.6617/Mum/2014. The case of “S.V. Angidi Chettiar” (supra) is not applicable to 10. the facts of the case. In the referred case, the issue unde…

Smt. Sarla Devi, Aligarh vs. ITO Ward 1(1), Aligarh

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 70/AGR/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 69Section 69C

…CIT”, Civil Appeal No. (e) 6465/2000 (SC). “CIT Ltd.”, (f) vs. Zoom Communications Pvt. ITA No.07/2010(Del) (H.C.). “CIT vs. HCIL Kalindee Arsspl”, ITA No.480/2012, Delhi High (g) Court. “Shyam Biri Works”, 259 ITR 625 (All). (h) “Sangam Enterprises vs. CIT”, 288 ITR 396 (All). (i) “Harish Hosiery Mart”, ITAT, Ahmedabad. (j) “CIT vs. Arcotech Ltd.” (Formerly SKS Ltd. ITA No.71/2013, (k) dated 12.09.2013. Delhi (H.C.). “B.A. Balasubramanian & Bros.”, 20 Taxman 215 (Mad). (l) I.T.A No. 70/Agra/2017 10 “Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation vs. DCIT” ITA (m) No.6617/Mum/2014. “ACIT vs. Dr. Prakash Kanhaiyalal…

Ms/ Bhole Baba Milk Food Industries, Agra vs. The A.C.I.T., Circle-4(1), Agra

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 378/AGR/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra09 Mar 2018AY 2008-09
Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 44A

…in ITA No.2078/Ahd/2006 & 2526/Ahd/206. “M/s K.P. Madhusudan vs. CIT”, Civil Appeal (d) No. 6465/2000 (SC). “CIT vs. Zoom Communications Pvt. Ltd.”, ITA (e) No.07/2010(Del) (H.C.). “ShyamBiri Works”, 259 ITR 625 (All. H.C.). (f) “Sangam Enterprises vs. CIT”, 288 ITR 396 (All). (g) “Harish Hosiery Mart”, ITAT, Ahmedabad. (h) “Arcotech”, (Del) (H.C.). (i) “B.A. Balasubramanian & Bros.”, 20 Taxman 215 (j) (Mad). “Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation vs. (k) DCIT” ITA No.6617/Mum/2014. The case of “S.V. AngidiChettiar” (supra) is not applicable to 10. the facts of the case. In the referred case, the issue under…

Sh. Sachin Arora, Mathura vs. I.T.O.-3(4), Mathura

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 118/AGR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Dec 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

…CIT”, Civil Appeal No. (e) 6465/2000 (SC). “CIT Ltd.”, (f) vs. Zoom Communications Pvt. ITA No.07/2010(Del) (H.C.). “CIT vs. HCIL Kalindee Arsspl”, ITA No.480/2012, Delhi High (g) Court. “Shyam Biri Works”, 259 ITR 625 (All). (h) “Sangam Enterprises vs. CIT”, 288 ITR 396 (All). (i) “Harish Hosiery Mart”, ITAT, Ahmedabad. (j) “CIT vs. Arcotech Ltd.” (Formerly SKS Ltd. ITA No.71/2013, (k) dated 12.09.2013. Delhi (H.C.). “B.A. Balasubramanian & Bros.”, 20 Taxman 215 (Mad). (l) “Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation vs. DCIT” ITA (m) No.6617/Mum/2014. “ACIT vs. Dr. Prakash Kanhaiyalal Kankariya”, ITA (n) No.1645…

Enterprises v. CIT (288 ITR 396) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax