Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT

432 ITR 471Supreme Court of India2021#50 most cited

What is Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Payments for the supply or use of computer software, where there is no transfer of copyright but only a right to use the copyrighted product, are generally considered business profits and not 'royalty' or 'fees for technical services' under the Income Tax Act, 1961 or relevant DTAAs. This principle also applies to transponder fees, which are not taxable as royalty.

914

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence · computer software royalty · section 9(1)(vi) · DTAA · fees for technical services · copyright transfer · copyrighted article · withholding tax · business profits · section 195 · transponder fees · taxability in India

Also reported as

125 Taxmann.com 42281 Taxmann 19

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 1961Section 9(1)(vi)Section 234BSection 195Section 90Section 144C(13)Section 9(1)(vii)
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

copyrighted articlesection 14(a)section 9(1)(vi)make available clausecomputer softwaresection 195(2)section 90(2)royalty incomewithholding taxforeign tax creditfees for included servicestax treaty

Judgments citing Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT

The Dy.DIT, (Intl. Taxn.)- 1, Ahmedabad vs. Vodafone West Ltd., Ahmedabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2398/AHD/2014[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member आयकर अपील सं /Ita No.2398/Ahd/2014 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Dcit (International Vodafone West Ltd. बनाम/ Taxation)-1 Vodafone House Ahmedabad Corporate Road V/S. Prahladnagar Off S.G. Highway Ahmedabad-380 051 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aaacf 1190 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Dinal Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Sudhakar Verma, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04/07/2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 12/07/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue As Against The Order Passed By The Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Appeals)-Gandhinagar (Ahmedabad) [Hereinafter Referred To As “The Ld.Cit(A)”], Dated 02/06/2014, Arising Out Of The Assessment Order Passed By The Dy.Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)-1, Ahmedabad (Ao) Under Section 201(1) & 201(1A) The Dcit (Intl.Taxn.)-1 Vs. Vodafone West Ltd. Asst. Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Dinal Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sudhakar Verma, Sr.DR
Section 195(1)Section 201(1)Section 9(1)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 90

…ficial to the assessee than the DTAA, they are not applicable in the present case, in accordance with section 90(2) of the Act. The Judicial Pronouncements Referenced in the cases are: 1. Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited v. CIT [2021] 432 ITR 471 (SC). The DCIT (Intl.Taxn.)-1 vs. Vodafone West Ltd. Asst. Year : 2013-14 14 The Supreme Court held that payments made by resident Indian end- users/distributors to non-resident computer software manufacturers/ suppliers are not royalties and therefore not liable for TDS under section 195 of the Income Tax Act. 2. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v…

Springer Nature Customer Service Center Gmbh, Germany vs. ACIT Circle 3(1)(2) Intl Tax New Delhi, Intl Tax New Delhi

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3307/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Himanshu Sinha, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Vijay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 234BSection 270A

…by the respondent/assessee, that the subscription fee could not be treated as royalty. Insofar as this aspect was concerned, the Tribunal followed the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Engineering Analysis Center of Excellence (P.) Ltd. v CIT, [2021] 432 ITR 471 (SC). 7. It is against this backdrop that the appellant/revenue has preferred the instant appeal. Submissions of Counsel 8. Arguments in support of the appeal, on behalf of the appellant/revenue, were advanced by Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel, while Mr. Himanshu Sinha made submissions on behalf of the respondent/assessee.…

Springer Nature Customer Service Center Gmbh, Germany vs. ACIT-3(1)(2) Int. Taxation, Delhi

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2420/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Himanshu Sinha, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Vijay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 234BSection 270A

…by the respondent/assessee, that the subscription fee could not be treated as royalty. Insofar as this aspect was concerned, the Tribunal followed the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Engineering Analysis Center of Excellence (P.) Ltd. v CIT, [2021] 432 ITR 471 (SC). 7. It is against this backdrop that the appellant/revenue has preferred the instant appeal. Submissions of Counsel 8. Arguments in support of the appeal, on behalf of the appellant/revenue, were advanced by Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel, while Mr. Himanshu Sinha made submissions on behalf of the respondent/assessee.…

Asha Rani Pandya, Indore vs. CPC Bangalore, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 176/IND/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniasha Rani Pandya Dcit/Acit-1(1) 389 1Ad- Scheme No.74C Indore Vijay Nagar, Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aqqpp7081A Assessee By Ms. Shreya Jain & Shri Prakash Jain, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 28 .06.2024

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 90Section 91

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Asha Rani Pandya DCIT/ACIT-1(1) 389 1AD- Scheme no.74C Indore Vijay Nagar, Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) PAN: AQQPP7081A Assessee by Ms. Shreya Jain & Shri Prakash Jain, ARs Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 27.06.2024 Date of Pronouncement 28 .06.2024 O R D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM : This appeal by assessee is directed against the order dated 24.01.2024 of the Commissioner of Income T…

Hireright Limited, United Kingdom vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(1)(1), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3880/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Sh. Kishore Kunal, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR
Section 10(50)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 234A

…'Royalties’ under the provisions of Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA. Support may be drawn by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering 6 Hireight Limited Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. vs. CIT (2021) 125 taxmann.com 42 (SC)/432 ITR 471 (SC). 13. Further the assessee does not provide access to any database to its clients but only access to reports requisition by the client in electronic form. Provision of online access of the report to its client is limited to providing access to the specific report providing relevant facts for the concerned candidates captured during the cours…

Finastra International Financial Systems Pte Limited, Singapore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax) Circle 1(3)(1), Delhi

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 3019/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON'BLE (Vice President), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Ms Tanmayee, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : D : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2021-22 Finastra International Financial Vs ACIT, Systems Pte Limited, International Taxation, 5 Shenton Way, Circle 1(3)(1), 12-01/04, UIC Building, Delhi. Singapore – 68808. PAN: AAICM2959D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms Tanmayee, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 24.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 27.06.2024 ORDER PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the Assessee against the fi…

Manav Malik, Noida vs. ACIT Circle 5(2)(2), Gautam Budh Nagar

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 2293/DEL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2019-20 Manav Malik, Vs Acit, B-146, Sector-19, Circle 5(2)(2), Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh – 201 301. Uttar Pradesh. Pan: Apzpm1646L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms Kirti Bindal, Ca Revenue By : Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.04.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.06.2024

For Appellant: Ms Kirti Bindal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2019-20 Manav Malik, Vs ACIT, B-146, Sector-19, Circle 5(2)(2), Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh – 201 301. Uttar Pradesh. PAN: APZPM1646L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms Kirti Bindal, CA Revenue by : Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 29.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 27.06.2024 ORDER PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 28.09.2022 of the Commissioner…

Snc Lavalin Inc., Delhi vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Int. Tax 3(1)(2), Delhi

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is allowed, the Stay Application of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 3691/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jun 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Sh. S. K. Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 270ASection 9(1)(vii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI Before Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member, Sh. Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member ITA No. 3691/Del/2023 : Asstt. Year: 2021-22 & SA No. 36/Del/2024 : : Asstt. Year: 2021-22 SNC Lavalin Inc., Vs ACIT, A-32, First Floor, Khasra No. 56, International Taxation, Village Amberahi, Sector-19, Circle-3(1)(2), Dwarka, New Delhi-110075 New Delhi-110002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAKCS5626H Assessee by : Sh. S. K. Aggarwal, CA Revenue by : Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 02.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 25.06.2024 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Ku…

Ramakrishna Rao, Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-2(3), Alipurduar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 541/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jun 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Siddarth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sailen Samadder, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 90

…7/11/2021. 7. It’s a trite law that DTAA overrides the provisions of the Act and the Rules, as held by various High Courts, which has also been approved by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P.) Ltd. reported in (2021) 432 ITR 471. 8. We accordingly, hold that FTC cannot be denied to the assessee. Assessee is directed to file the relevant details/evidences in support of its claim. We thus remand this issue back to the Ld.AO to consider the claim of assessee in accordance with law, based on the verification carried out in respect of the supporting documents filed by assesse…

Sharad Mathur, Hyderabad vs. DCIT., Circle 12(1), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 332/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jun 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.331 & 332/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2019-20 & 2021-22) Shri Sharad Mathur Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Hyderabad Circle 12(2) Pan:Aogpm3520B Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri B.Satyanarayana Murthy,Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Smt. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 03/06/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: /06/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri B.Satyanarayana Murthy,CAFor Respondent: : Smt. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 139(1)Section 154Section 90Section 91

…7/11/2021. 7. It's a trite law that DTAA overrides the provisions of the Act and the Rules, as held by various High Courts, which has also been approved by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P.) Ltd. reported in (2021) 432 ITR 471. Page 5 of 7 ITA Nos 331 and 332 of 2024 Sharad Mathur 8. We accordingly, hold that FTC cannot be denied to the assessee. Assessee is directed to file the relevant details/evidences in support of its claim. We thus remand this issue back to the Ld.AO to consider the claim of assessee in accordance with law, based on the verification carried out…

DDIT (It) 2(1), Mumbai vs. Siemens Ag, Mumbai

ITA 2179/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2024AY 2009-10
Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 153Section 9(1)(vi)

…of the assessee in assessment years 2003-04 & 2004-05." 13. Now, this issue of taxation of royalty under the DTAA has been decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited vs. CIT reported in (2021) 432 ITR 471(SC). The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order grouped various appeals before it into following four categories: - The first category deals with cases in which computer software is purchased directly by an end-user, resident in India, from a foreign, non-resident supplier or manufacturer. - The second category of cases deals with resident Indian c…

Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, Mumbai vs. DDIT (It) 2(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2153/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI B R BASKARAN (Accountant Member), SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member)

Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 153Section 9(1)(vi)

…of the assessee in assessment years 2003-04 & 2004-05." 13. Now, this issue of taxation of royalty under the DTAA has been decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited vs. CIT reported in (2021) 432 ITR 471(SC). The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order grouped various appeals before it into following four categories: - The first category deals with cases in which computer software is purchased directly by an end-user, resident in India, from a foreign, non-resident supplier or manufacturer. - The second category of cases deals with resident Indian c…

Joint Commissioner of Income -Tax, Special Range - 6, Bangalore vs. M/S. Samsung R & D Institute India-Bangalore Private Limited, Bangalore

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 978/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix Building, The Joint / Deputy ITA/IT(TP)A Bagmane Commissioner of 2011-12 Nos. 1008, Constellation Income Tax, to 1092, 1166 & Business Park, Circle – 6(1)(1), 2014-15 484/Bang/2019 Outer Ring Road, Bangalore. Doddanekundi Circle, Marathahalli Post, Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: AAICS6290F M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix The…

Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax, Special Range-6, Bangalore vs. M/S. Samsung R & D Institute India-Bangalore Private Limited, Bangalore

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 958/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix Building, The Joint / Deputy ITA/IT(TP)A Bagmane Commissioner of 2011-12 Nos. 1008, Constellation Income Tax, to 1092, 1166 & Business Park, Circle – 6(1)(1), 2014-15 484/Bang/2019 Outer Ring Road, Bangalore. Doddanekundi Circle, Marathahalli Post, Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: AAICS6290F M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix The…

M/S. Samsung R & D Institute India Bangalore Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income- Tax, Circle - 6(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 1166/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix Building, The Joint / Deputy ITA/IT(TP)A Bagmane Commissioner of 2011-12 Nos. 1008, Constellation Income Tax, to 1092, 1166 & Business Park, Circle – 6(1)(1), 2014-15 484/Bang/2019 Outer Ring Road, Bangalore. Doddanekundi Circle, Marathahalli Post, Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: AAICS6290F M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix The…

M/S. Samsung R & D Institute India Bangalore Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 6(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 1092/BANG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix Building, The Joint / Deputy ITA/IT(TP)A Bagmane Commissioner of 2011-12 Nos. 1008, Constellation Income Tax, to 1092, 1166 & Business Park, Circle – 6(1)(1), 2014-15 484/Bang/2019 Outer Ring Road, Bangalore. Doddanekundi Circle, Marathahalli Post, Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: AAICS6290F M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix The…

Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range - 6, Bangalore vs. M/S. Samsung R &D Institute India- Bangalore Private Limited, Bangalore

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 1046/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix Building, The Joint / Deputy ITA/IT(TP)A Bagmane Commissioner of 2011-12 Nos. 1008, Constellation Income Tax, to 1092, 1166 & Business Park, Circle – 6(1)(1), 2014-15 484/Bang/2019 Outer Ring Road, Bangalore. Doddanekundi Circle, Marathahalli Post, Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: AAICS6290F M/s. Samsung R&D Institute India – Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., 2870, Phoenix The…

Gartner Ireland Limited, Mumbai vs. Deputy Comm. of Income Tax-2(3)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allo

ITA 2460/MUM/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 May 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Gartner Ireland Ltd., Dcit-2(3)(2), 3Rd Floor, Two Park Place, 17Th Floor, 1711, Air India Hatch Street, Dublin 2, Vs. Building, Nariman Point, Ireland D02 Np94. Mumbai-400021. Pan No. Aaccg 2919 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Farooq Irani Revenue By : Mr. A.K. Ambastha, Sr. Dr : Date Of Hearing 12/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 30/05/2024

For Appellant: Mr. Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Mr. A.K. Ambastha, Sr. DR
Section 234DSection 9(1)(vi)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “I” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Gartner Ireland Ltd., DCIT-2(3)(2), 3rd floor, Two Park Place, 17th floor, 1711, Air India Hatch Street, Dublin 2, Vs. Building, Nariman Point, Ireland D02 NP94. Mumbai-400021. PAN No. AACCG 2919 B Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Mr. Farooq Irani Revenue by : Mr. A.K. Ambastha, Sr. DR : Date of Hearing 12/04/2024 : Date of pronouncement 30/05/2024 ORDER PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM This appeal by the assessee is directed against final…

Titan Company Limited 9Earstwhile Known As Titan Industries Limited), Krishnagiri vs. ACIT Ltu 1, Chennai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 518/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Shri T. Surya Narayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,‘डी’ "यायपीठ,चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी महावीर "सह, उपा"य" एवं "ी अिमताभ शु"ला, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.: 518, 505, 506 & 507/CHNY/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 Titan Company Ltd., 1. The Assistant (Erstwhile known as Titan Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Industries Ltd.,) Circle III(2), #3, SIPCOT Indl. Complex, Chennai. Hosur, Krishnagiri – 635 126. 2. The Joint / Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Taxpayer…

Titan Company Limited 9Earstwhile Known As Titan Industries Limited), Krishnagiri vs. ACIT Ltu 1, Chennai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 507/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Shri T. Surya Narayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,‘डी’ "यायपीठ,चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी महावीर "सह, उपा"य" एवं "ी अिमताभ शु"ला, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.: 518, 505, 506 & 507/CHNY/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 Titan Company Ltd., 1. The Assistant (Erstwhile known as Titan Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Industries Ltd.,) Circle III(2), #3, SIPCOT Indl. Complex, Chennai. Hosur, Krishnagiri – 635 126. 2. The Joint / Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Taxpayer…