Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai

84 Taxmann.com 51Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2017#313 most cited

What is Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai authority for?

A penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot be deleted merely due to technical defects in the penalty notice, such as not ticking the specific default, if the assessee understood the charges.

263

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT · Section 271(1)(c) · Section 274 · penalty notice defect · technical defect in notice · non-ticking of clause · show cause notice validity · deletion of penalty · concealment of income penalty · inaccurate particulars penalty · ITAT Mumbai.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai

ITO, Ward - 13(1), Kolkata vs. M/S. Ambey Retailers Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2104/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2012-13 Income Tax Officer V/S. M/S Ambey Retailers Pvt. Ward-13(1), 9Th Ltd. 29B, Rabidra Sarani, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata-73 Floor, 110, Shanti Pally, Aayakar [Pan No.Aahca 8700 F] Bhawan (Poorva), Kolkata-107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri R. Chowdhury, Addl. Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant None ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 13-08-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 05-09-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2012-13 Challenges Correctness Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Kolkata’S Order Dated 03.07.2017, Passed In Case No.472/Cit(A)-5/W-15(1)/15-16, Reversing The Assessing Officer’S Action Deleting Imposing Penalty Of ₹50,21,837/- Involving Proceedings U/S. 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. 2. We Have Heard Learned Departmental Representative Arguing In Favour The Above Impugned Penalty. Case File Perused. It Emerges First Of All That Cit(A)’S Detailed Discussion On The Issue Reads As Under:- “1. By Way Of Additional Ground The Objection Raised Is That The Ao Failed To Strike Off The Irrelevant Portion In The Notice Initiating Penalty U/S 271(1)(C)/ Section 274. Relying On The Decision Of Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory & Others [2013] 359 Itr

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “D” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA Before Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member and Dr. A.L. Saini, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2012-13 Income Tax Officer V/s. M/s Ambey Retailers Pvt. Ward-13(1), 9th Ltd. 29B, Rabidra Sarani, 3rd Floor, Kolkata-73 Floor, 110, Shanti Pally, Aayakar [PAN No.AAHCA 8700 F] Bhawan (Poorva), Kolkata-107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri R. Chowdhury, Addl. CIT-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant None ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 13-08-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 05-09-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of…

Sri Supratik Banerjee, Birbhum vs. ACIT, Circle - 3, Suri, Birbhum

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 650/KOL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Aug 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: The Cit-A The Notice Dt. 29-12-2009 Issued By The Ao [Acit, Cir-3, Suri] U/Sec 274 R.W.S 271(1) ( C) Of The Act Is Defective For Not Mentioning The Specific Charge & Placed Reliance On The Decision Of The Hon’Ble Supreme Court In The Case Of Ssa’S Emerald Meadows. The Cit-A Without Considering The Same Confirmed The Penalty Imposed By The Ao U/S. 271(1) ( C ) Of The Act By Placing Reliance On The Decisions Of The Hon’Ble Supreme Court In The Cases Of Mak Data (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18389 Of 2013) & Dharmendra Textiles Reported In (2008) 306 Itr 277(Sc).

For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl.CIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH: KOLKATA Before: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member and Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member I.T.A No. 650/Kol/2018 A.Y: 2007-08 Supratik Banerjee Vs. A.C.I.T, Cir-3, Kolkata PAN: ADCPB 2184K [Appellant] [Respondent] For the Appellant : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate, ld.AR For the Respondent : Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl.CIT, ld.Sr.DR Date of hearing : 12-06-2018 Date of pronouncement : 08-08-2018 ORDER Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi The above appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Burdwan dt…

Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai (84 Taxmann.com 51) — Cited in 263 Judgments | BharatTax