Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai

84 Taxmann.com 51Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2017#313 most cited

What is Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai authority for?

A penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot be deleted merely due to technical defects in the penalty notice, such as not ticking the specific default, if the assessee understood the charges.

263

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,164 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT · Section 271(1)(c) · Section 274 · penalty notice defect · technical defect in notice · non-ticking of clause · show cause notice validity · deletion of penalty · concealment of income penalty · inaccurate particulars penalty · ITAT Mumbai.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai

DCIT, Cir-11(2), Kolkata vs. M/S P C Chandra (Jewellers) Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1197/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Feb 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2011-12 Dct, Crcle-11(2), V/S. M/S P.C. Chandra P-7, Chowringhee (Jewellers), Pvt. Ltd., Square, Kolkta-69 49C, Gaiahat Road, Kolkata-19 [Pan No.Aabcp 8654 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. Cit-Sr-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 11-01-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 02-02-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata Dated 06.07.2015. Assessment Was Framed By Dcit, Circle-11, Kolkata U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 28.08.2013 For Assessment Year 2011-12. Revenue Has Raised Following Ground:- “1. That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Assessee Ld. Cit Has Erred In Deleting The Penalty Of Rs.23,68,786/- Imposed U/S. 271(1)(C) Of The It Act. 1961. 2. That The Appellant Craves For Leave To Add, Delete Or Modify Any Of The Grounds Of Appeal Before Or All The Time Of Hearing.”

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “C” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “C” KOLKATA Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Judicial Member and Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2011-12 DCT, Crcle-11(2), V/s. M/s P.C. Chandra P-7, Chowringhee (Jewellers), Pvt. Ltd., Square, Kolkta-69 49C, Gaiahat Road, Kolkata-19 [PAN No.AABCP 8654 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT-SR-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 11-01-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 02-02-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदे…

Lalit Jalan, Kolkata vs. The ITO, WD-32(3), Kolkata

In the result the appeal of the assessee, is allowed

ITA 350/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevanand Dr.A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11 Lalit Jalan, V/S. Income Tax Officer, C/O M.S Orient Ward-32(3), 10B, Distributors, 26, Middelton Row, Sharespear Sarani, Kolkata-700 071 Kolkata-700 017 [Pan No.Acxpj5133G] अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""थ"/Respondent .. अपीलाथ"की ओर से/By Appellant Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/By Respondent Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 21-12-2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 17/01/2018 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. A.L. Saini, Accountantmember:- This Caption Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-11, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Kolkata,Dated 18.12.2015, Which In Turn Arises Out Ofa Penalty Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 271(1)(C ) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’), Vide His Order Dated 13.09.2013. 2. In This Appeal The Assessee Has Challenged The Order Of Ld.Cit(A), Whereby The Ld.Cit(A) Confirmed The Order Of Ao Imposing Penalty On The Assessee U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act).

Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपीलीय अधीकरण, "ायपीठ – “B” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “B” KOLKATA Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Judicial Memberand Dr.A.L. Saini, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2010-11 Lalit Jalan, V/s. Income Tax Officer, C/o M.s Orient Ward-32(3), 10B, Distributors, 26, Middelton Row, Sharespear Sarani, Kolkata-700 071 Kolkata-700 017 [PAN No.ACXPJ5133G] अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""थ"/Respondent .. अपीलाथ"की ओर से/By Appellant Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/By Respondent Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing 21-12-2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement…

M/S. Snowtex Investment Ltd., Kolkata vs. Income Tax Officer, Kolkata

In the result the appeal of the assessee, is allowed

ITA 1347/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V. Vasudevan, Jm & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.A No.1347/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/S. Snowtex Investment Ltd. -Vs.- Ito, Wd-12(3), Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aaecs 0334 C ] (Appellant) (Respondent) : Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate For The Appellant For The Respondent : Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl.Cit Date Of Hearing : 04.12.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 17/01/2018 Order Per Dr. A.L. Saini, Am This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 19.04.2016 Of Cit(A)-4, Kolkata Relating To A.Y.2008-09. 2. In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged The Order Of Cit(A) Whereby The Cit(A) Confirmed The Order Of Ao Imposing Penalty On The Assessee U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). 3. The Facts & Circumstances Under Which Penalty U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act Was Imposed On The Assessee Was That During The Assessment Year 2008-09, The Assessee Has Advanced Interest Free Loans To The Extent Of Rs.9,58,95,000/- & As There Had Been No Significant Repayment, The Closing Balance As On 31.03.2008 Was At Rs. 9,62,95,000/-. It Was Also Seen From The Details For A.Y. 2009-10, That There Had Been No Business Transactions Apart From Interest Free Loan Transactions. The Unsecured Loans On Which Interest Was Paid, Was Rs. 5,92,05,572/-, Which Was Much Below The Amount, Which Was Advanced By The Assessee Free Of Any Interest. Therefore, There Had Been No Justification Of Unsecured Loan Taken During The Year. Therefore, Whole Sum Of Interest Paid Of Rs. 62,84,112/- Was Disallowed. The Cit(A) Restricted The M/S. Snowtex Investment Ltd.

For Respondent: Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl.CIT
Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 41(1)

…M/s. Snowtex Investment Ltd. I.T.A No.1347/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2008-09 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon’ble Sri N.V. Vasudevan, JM & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM] I.T.A No.1347/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/s. Snowtex Investment Ltd. -vs.- ITO, Wd-12(3), Kolkata Kolkata [PAN : AAECS 0334 C ] (Appellant) (Respondent) : Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate For the Appellant For the Respondent : Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl.CIT Date of Hearing : 04.12.2017. Date of Pronouncement : 17/01/2018 ORDER Per Dr. A.L. Saini, AM This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order date…

Mr Vijay Kumar Shaw, Kolkata vs. ITO, WD-25(2), Kolkata

In the result the appeal of the assessee, is allowed

ITA 891/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2018AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevanand Dr.A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2006-07 Mr. Vijay Kumar Shaw V/S. Income Tax Officer, 88, Brijee Road, Garia Ward-25(2), Ayakar Kolkata-700 068 Bhawan, Dakshin, 2 [Pan No.Ambps 1819 A] Gariahat Road (South), Kolkata-68 अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""थ"/Respondent .. अपीलाथ"की ओर से/By Appellant Shri D. Chakraborty, Fca ""थ" की ओर से/By Respondent Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 18-12-2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 17-01-2018 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. A.L. Saini:- This Caption Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2006-07, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-7,Dated 08.05.2015, Which In Turn Arises Out Of A Penalty Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 271 (1) (C )Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’), Vide His Order Dated 30.10.2013. 2. In This Appeal The Assessee Has Challenged The Order Of Ld.Cit(A) Whereby The Ld.Cit(A) Confirmed The Order Of Ao Imposing Penalty On The Assessee U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act).

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपीलीय अधीकरण, "ायपीठ – “B” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “B” KOLKATA Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Judicial Memberand Dr.A.L. Saini, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2006-07 Mr. Vijay Kumar Shaw V/s. Income Tax Officer, 88, Brijee Road, Garia Ward-25(2), Ayakar Kolkata-700 068 Bhawan, Dakshin, 2 [PAN No.AMBPS 1819 A] Gariahat Road (South), Kolkata-68 अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""थ"/Respondent .. अपीलाथ"की ओर से/By Appellant Shri D. Chakraborty, FCA ""थ" की ओर से/By Respondent Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing 18-12-2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement…

DCIT, Cir-4(1), Kolkata vs. M/S Bandhan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1348/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Dr.A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11 Dcit, Central Circle- V/S. M/S Bandhan Financial 4(1), Services Pvt. Ltd., 17/30, Aayakarbhavanpoorva, Dakshindari Road, Lake 110, Shanti Palli, E.M. Town, Kolkat-48 By Pass, 4Th Floor, [Pan No.Aabcg 0611 R] Kolkata-107 अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""थ"/Respondent .. अपीलाथ"की ओर से/By Appellant Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. Cit-Dr ""थ" की ओर से/By Respondent Shri Shikha Agarwal, Aca सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 11-12-2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 17/01/2018 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. A.L. Saini:- This Caption Appeal Filed By The Revenue, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-11, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Dated 07.08.2015, Which In Turn Arises Out Of A Penalty Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 271(1) (C ) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’), Vide His Order Dated 26.09.2013. 2. In This Appeal, The Revenue Has Challenged The Order Of Ld.Cit(A) Whereby The Ld.Cit(A) Deleted The Order Of Ao Imposing Penalty On The Assessee U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act).

Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपीलीय अधीकरण, "ायपीठ – “B” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “B” KOLKATA Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Judicial Member and Dr.A.L. Saini, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2010-11 DCIT, Central Circle- V/s. M/s Bandhan Financial 4(1), Services Pvt. Ltd., 17/30, AayakarBhavanPoorva, Dakshindari Road, Lake 110, Shanti Palli, E.M. Town, Kolkat-48 By Pass, 4th Floor, [PAN No.AABCG 0611 R] Kolkata-107 अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""थ"/Respondent .. अपीलाथ"की ओर से/By Appellant Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. CIT-DR ""थ" की ओर से/By Respondent Shri Shikha Agarwal, ACA सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing 11-12-…