Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai

84 Taxmann.com 51Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2017#313 most cited

What is Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai authority for?

A penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot be deleted merely due to technical defects in the penalty notice, such as not ticking the specific default, if the assessee understood the charges.

263

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT · Section 271(1)(c) · Section 274 · penalty notice defect · technical defect in notice · non-ticking of clause · show cause notice validity · deletion of penalty · concealment of income penalty · inaccurate particulars penalty · ITAT Mumbai.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Earthmoving Equipment Service Corporation v. DCIT 22(2), Mumbai

Shambhu Kumar More, Kolkata vs. ACIT, CC-Xxiii, Kolkata

In the result, the miscellaneous applications as well as appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2244/KOL/2014[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2006-2007

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] M.A. Nos. 50-52/Kol/2018 (A/O I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014) Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -Vs.- Acit, Cc-Xxiii, Kolkata [Pan : Adlpm 3303 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -Vs.- Acit, Cc-Xxiii, Kolkata [Pan : Adlpm 3303 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 13.04.2018. Date Of Pronouncement : 13.04.2018 Order Per M.Balaganeh, Am By Virtue Of These Miscellaneous Applications, The Assessee Seeks To Recall The Ex Parte Order Passed By This Tribunal Dismissing The Appeals Of The Assessee For Non- Prosecution. The Assessee Filed An Affidavit Before Us Stating That Notice Of Hearing Was Not Received By The Assessee & Accordingly, Prayed For Recalling Of The Order Passed By The Tribunal. He Has Stated That The Appeals Were Preferred By The Assessee Against Confirmation By Ld. Cit(A) Of Orders Passed U/S 271(1)(C ) Of The Act By The Ld. Ao, By Issuing Defective Show Cause Notice U/S 274 Read With Section 271(1)(C ) Of The Act, Inasmuch As The Ld. Ao Had Not Mentioned Specific Charge Of Offence Committed By The 2 M.A.Nos.50-52/Kol/2018

For Appellant: Shri Subhash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 271Section 271(1)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon’ble Shri M. Balaganesh, AM & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, JM] M.A. Nos. 50-52/Kol/2018 (A/o I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014) Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -vs.- ACIT, CC-XXIII, Kolkata [PAN : ADLPM 3303 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -vs.- ACIT, CC-XXIII, Kolkata [PAN : ADLPM 3303 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) For the Appellant : Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR) Date of Hear…

Shambhu Kumar More, Kolkata vs. ACIT, CC-Xxiii, Kolkata

In the result, the miscellaneous applications as well as appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2243/KOL/2014[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2005-2006

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] M.A. Nos. 50-52/Kol/2018 (A/O I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014) Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -Vs.- Acit, Cc-Xxiii, Kolkata [Pan : Adlpm 3303 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -Vs.- Acit, Cc-Xxiii, Kolkata [Pan : Adlpm 3303 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 13.04.2018. Date Of Pronouncement : 13.04.2018 Order Per M.Balaganeh, Am By Virtue Of These Miscellaneous Applications, The Assessee Seeks To Recall The Ex Parte Order Passed By This Tribunal Dismissing The Appeals Of The Assessee For Non- Prosecution. The Assessee Filed An Affidavit Before Us Stating That Notice Of Hearing Was Not Received By The Assessee & Accordingly, Prayed For Recalling Of The Order Passed By The Tribunal. He Has Stated That The Appeals Were Preferred By The Assessee Against Confirmation By Ld. Cit(A) Of Orders Passed U/S 271(1)(C ) Of The Act By The Ld. Ao, By Issuing Defective Show Cause Notice U/S 274 Read With Section 271(1)(C ) Of The Act, Inasmuch As The Ld. Ao Had Not Mentioned Specific Charge Of Offence Committed By The 2 M.A.Nos.50-52/Kol/2018

For Appellant: Shri Subhash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 271Section 271(1)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon’ble Shri M. Balaganesh, AM & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, JM] M.A. Nos. 50-52/Kol/2018 (A/o I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014) Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -vs.- ACIT, CC-XXIII, Kolkata [PAN : ADLPM 3303 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -vs.- ACIT, CC-XXIII, Kolkata [PAN : ADLPM 3303 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) For the Appellant : Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR) Date of Hear…

Shambhu Kumar More, Kolkata vs. ACIT, CC-Xxiii, Kolkata

In the result, the miscellaneous applications as well as appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2242/KOL/2014[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2004-2005

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] M.A. Nos. 50-52/Kol/2018 (A/O I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014) Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -Vs.- Acit, Cc-Xxiii, Kolkata [Pan : Adlpm 3303 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -Vs.- Acit, Cc-Xxiii, Kolkata [Pan : Adlpm 3303 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 13.04.2018. Date Of Pronouncement : 13.04.2018 Order Per M.Balaganeh, Am By Virtue Of These Miscellaneous Applications, The Assessee Seeks To Recall The Ex Parte Order Passed By This Tribunal Dismissing The Appeals Of The Assessee For Non- Prosecution. The Assessee Filed An Affidavit Before Us Stating That Notice Of Hearing Was Not Received By The Assessee & Accordingly, Prayed For Recalling Of The Order Passed By The Tribunal. He Has Stated That The Appeals Were Preferred By The Assessee Against Confirmation By Ld. Cit(A) Of Orders Passed U/S 271(1)(C ) Of The Act By The Ld. Ao, By Issuing Defective Show Cause Notice U/S 274 Read With Section 271(1)(C ) Of The Act, Inasmuch As The Ld. Ao Had Not Mentioned Specific Charge Of Offence Committed By The 2 M.A.Nos.50-52/Kol/2018

For Appellant: Shri Subhash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 271Section 271(1)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon’ble Shri M. Balaganesh, AM & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, JM] M.A. Nos. 50-52/Kol/2018 (A/o I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014) Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -vs.- ACIT, CC-XXIII, Kolkata [PAN : ADLPM 3303 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A Nos.2242-2244/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2004-05,2005-06&2006-07 Shambhu Kumar More -vs.- ACIT, CC-XXIII, Kolkata [PAN : ADLPM 3303 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) For the Appellant : Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR) Date of Hear…

M/S Expert Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-5(3), Kolkata

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 61/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2008-09 M/S Expert Jewellers Pvt. V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ltd., 9/12 Lal Bazar Ward-5(2), Aayakar Street, Block-A, Bhawan, -7, Kolkata-001 Chowringhee Square, [Pan No.Aabce 9275 H] Kolkata-69 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Parnashree Banerjee, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri G. Hangshing Cit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 28-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 04-04-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Kolkata Dated 18.10.2016. Assessment Was Framed By Ito Ward-5(3), Kolkata U/S 143(3)/263/143(3)/147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 26.09.2014 For Assessment Year 2008-09. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds:- “1. That, On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred & Acted Against The Principal Of Natural Justice In Having Passed The Ex Parte Appellate Order Without Affording Adequate Opportunity Of Being Heard To The Appellant & Hence The Same Is Liable To Be Quashed. 2. That, The Ld. Cit(A) Further Erred In Having Presumed For Alleged Non- Compliance Of Notices That The Appellant Did Not Appear To Be Interested In Pursuing The Appeal, Leading To Dismissal Of All The Grounds On The Sole Foundation That In His Appellate Order He Has Upheld The Addition Of Rs.9,69,00,702/- As Unexplained Cash Credit, Which Has Resulted In Concealment Of Particulars Of Income.

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “D” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Judicial Member and Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2008-09 M/s Expert Jewellers Pvt. V/s. Income Tax Officer, Ltd., 9/12 Lal Bazar Ward-5(2), Aayakar Street, Block-A, Bhawan, -7, Kolkata-001 Chowringhee Square, [PAN No.AABCE 9275 H] Kolkata-69 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Parnashree Banerjee, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri G. Hangshing CIT-DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 28-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 04-04-2018 घोषणा क" तार…

ACIT, Central Circle-2(3), Kolkata vs. M/S Basanti Properties Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 151/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2013-14 Acit, Central Circle- V/S. M/S Basanti Properties 2(3), Roomno403, 4Th Pvt. Ltd., 107/1, Park Floor, Aayakar Bhawan Street, Kolkata-16 Poorva,110, Shanti [Pan No.Aabcb 0344 E] Pally, E.M. Bye-Pass, Kolkata-107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri G. Hangshing, Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri A.K. Tibrewal, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 28-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 04-04-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Kolkata Dated 08.11.2016. Penalty Imposed By Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 29.09.2014 For Assessment Year 2013-14. Shri G. Hangshing, Ld. Departmental Representative Appeared On Behalf Of Revenue & Shri A.K. Tibrewal, Ld. Authorized Representative Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee. 2. Sole Issue Raised By The Revenue In This Appeal Is That Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Penalty Levied By The Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act.

Section 133ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “D” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Judicial Member and Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2013-14 ACIT, Central Circle- V/s. M/s Basanti Properties 2(3), RoomNo403, 4th Pvt. Ltd., 107/1, Park Floor, Aayakar Bhawan Street, Kolkata-16 Poorva,110, Shanti [PAN No.AABCB 0344 E] Pally, E.M. Bye-pass, Kolkata-107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri G. Hangshing, CIT-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri A.K. Tibrewal, FCA ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 28-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 04-…

ACIT, Central Circle-2(3), Kolkata vs. M/S Kwality Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 150/KOL/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Apr 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2011-12 Acit, Central Circle- V/S. M/S Kwality Ltd. 2(3), Room No. 403, 4Th F-82, Shivaji Place, Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Rajouri Garden, New Poorva, 110, Shanti Delhi-100 027 Pally, E.M. Bye-Pas, [Pan No.Aabck 1289 R] Kolkata-107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri G. Hangshing, Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri A.K. Tibrewal, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 28-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 04-04-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-20 Dated 08.11.2016. Penalty Levied By Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 29.09.2015 For Assessment Year 2011-12. The Revenue Has Raised Following Ground:- “(I) That, Under The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In View Of The Distinction Of Facts Of The Instant Case (Discussed Elaborately In Respect To He Statement Of Facts) That The Of The Case Law Relied Upon In Deciding The Case In Favour Of The Assessee, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Allowing Relief To The Assessee. (Ii) That The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter Or Amend Any Ground Or Grounds Of Appeal Before Or At The Time Of Hearing.”

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “D” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Judicial Member and Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2011-12 ACIT, Central Circle- V/s. M/s Kwality Ltd. 2(3), Room No. 403, 4th F-82, Shivaji Place, Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Rajouri Garden, New Poorva, 110, Shanti Delhi-100 027 Pally, E.M. Bye-pas, [PAN No.AABCK 1289 R] Kolkata-107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri G. Hangshing, CIT-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri A.K. Tibrewal, FCA ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 28-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of…