Dy. CIT v. U.K Paints Overseas Ltd.

150 Taxmann.com 108Supreme Court of India2023#469 most cited

What is Dy. CIT v. U.K Paints Overseas Ltd. authority for?

The Supreme Court in this case reiterates that additions to completed assessments under Section 153A or Section 153C must be based solely on incriminating material found during the course of a search and seizure operation, reinforcing the principle laid down in Abhisar Buildwell.

198

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Dy. CIT v. U.K Paints Overseas Ltd. · 150 taxmann.com 108 · Section 153A · Section 153C · Section 132 · incriminating material · search assessment · completed assessment · Abhisar Buildwell · assessment procedure

Also reported as

454 ITR 441294 Taxmann 722023 SCC OnLine SC 818

Sections most often in play

Section 153CSection 153ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 139Section 151

Issues it is cited on

section 153atosection 153b(1)(a)abatement of assessmentsection 153c proceedingssection 113section 153b(1)section 158bdsection 153c(1)block periodsection 153(a)true and full disclosuresatisfaction note

Judgments citing Dy. CIT v. U.K Paints Overseas Ltd.

Adhyatm Jain Prop. M/S Jambu Kumar Adhyatam Jain Saraf, Lucknow vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Lucknow

In the result, all the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 787/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Lucknow06 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 132Section 153ASection 153DSection 250Section 68

…I.T.A. No.787/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year:2015-16 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.787/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Adhyatm Jain, Vs. Dy.C.I.T.-2, Prop. M/s Jambu Kumar Central Circle-2, Adhyatam Jain Saraf, Lucknow. 322/34, Surangi Tola, Chowk, Lucknow. PAN:AAQPJ4623E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Akshay Agrawal, Advocate Respondent by Shri Manu Chaurasia, CIT (D.R.) O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.801/Lkw/2024 has bee…

ACIT, Circle-18(2), New Delhi vs. Niit Technologies Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 3559/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 37Section 41Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69C

…ITA No.3558/Del/2025 & Others INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “G” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sl. ITA No(s) Asst. Appeal(s) by No Year(s) Appellant vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 3558/Del/2025 2019-20 DCIT M/s. Allure Developers Pvt. Ltd., Flat No.14, Ground Floor, Central Circle –I Noida DDA MIG, Sura Apartment, Pul Pehladpur, New Delhi- 110044. PAN-AALCA3631R 2. 3559/Del/2025 2020-21 -do- -do- 3. 4108/Del/2025 2021-22 -do- -do- M/s. Ajay Realcon Pvt. Ltd., 4. 3560/Del/2025 2020-21 -do- Plot No.01-B, 7th Floor, Sector-126,…

ACIT, Jaipur vs. Udai Buildhome Pvt Ltd, Jaipur

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1486/JPR/2024[2018]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Mar 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.1399, 1400, 1401 & 1486/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-02, Jaipur बनाम Vs. M/s Udai Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. 302, Golden Sunrise Apartment, Lajpat Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AABCU 5068 J अपीलार्थी / Appellant निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by: प्रत्यर्थी / Respond

For Appellant: Sh. C.M. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Roshanta Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 1399, 1400, 1401 & 1486/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 cuke Asstt. Commissioner of Income M/s Udai Buildhome Pvt. Vs. Tax, Ltd. 302, Golden Sunrise Central Circle-02, Jaipur Apartment, Lajpat Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AABCU 5068 J vihykFkhZ@Appellant i…

ACIT, Jaipur vs. Udai Buildhome Pvt Ltd, Jaipur

ITA 1401/JPR/2024[2017]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Mar 2025
For Appellant: Sh. C.M. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Roshanta Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, जयपुर न्यायपीठ, जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,"B" JAIPUR डा० एस. सीतालक्ष्मी, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री राठोड कमलेश जयन्तभाई, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.1399, 1400, 1401 & 1486/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Asstt. Commissioner of Income बनाम M/s Udai Buildhome Pvt. Tax, Vs. Ltd. 302, Golden Sunrise Central Circle-02, Jaipur Apartment, Lajpat Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AABCU 5068 J अपीलार्थी / Appell…

ACIT, Jaipur vs. Udai Buildhome Pvt Ltd, Jaipur

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1400/JPR/2024[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Mar 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.1399, 1400, 1401 & 1486/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Asstt. Commissioner of Income बनाम M/s Udai Buildhome Pvt. Tax, Vs. Ltd. 302, Golden Sunrise Central Circle-02, Jaipur Apartment, Lajpat Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AABCU 5068 J अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee

For Appellant: Sh. C.M. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Roshanta Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 1399, 1400, 1401 & 1486/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 cuke Asstt. Commissioner of Income M/s Udai Buildhome Pvt. Vs. Tax, Ltd. 302, Golden Sunrise Central Circle-02, Jaipur Apartment, Lajpat Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AABCU 5068 J vihykFkhZ@Appellant i…

ACIT, Jaipur vs. M/S Udai Buildhome Pvt Ltd., Jaipur

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1399/JPR/2024[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Mar 2025
For Appellant: Sh. C.M. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Roshanta Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, जयपुर न्यायपीठ, जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, "B" JAIPUR डा० एस. सीतालक्ष्मी, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री राठोड कमलेश जयन्तभाई, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.1399, 1400, 1401 & 1486/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Asstt. Commissioner of Income बनाम M/s Udai Buildhome Pvt. Tax, Vs. Ltd. 302, Golden Sunrise Central Circle-02, Jaipur Apartment, Lajpat Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AABCU 5068 J अपीलार्थी / Appel…

ACIT, Central Circle- 30, New Delhi vs. Kuber Securities, New Delhi

ITA 4213/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTNAT MEMBER ITA Nos.4216, 4217, 4218, 4219, 4220, 4221, 4222 & 4223/Del/2025 [Assessment Years:2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 : 2019-20 and 2020-21] Sakshi Agarwal, Deputy Commissioner of Income 56, SFS Flats, Ashok Vihar, Tax, Central Circle-28, Room Phase-IV, New Delhi-110052 Vs No.327, ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-110055 PAN-ATWPG1641E Appellant Respondent ITA Nos.4264, 4265, 4266, 4267, 4268, 4269, 4271 & 4272/Del/2025 [Ass…

ITO, Ward- 6(4), New Delhi vs. Creative Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 4265/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTNAT MEMBER ITA Nos.4216, 4217, 4218, 4219, 4220, 4221, 4222 & 4223/Del/2025 [Assessment Years:2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 : 2019-20 and 2020-21] Sakshi Agarwal, Deputy Commissioner of Income 56, SFS Flats, Ashok Vihar, Tax, Central Circle-28, Room Phase-IV, New Delhi-110052 Vs No.327, ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-110055 PAN-ATWPG1641E Appellant Respondent ITA Nos.4264, 4265, 4266, 4267, 4268, 4269, 4271 & 4272/Del/2025 [Ass…

Partistha Commercial Centre Private Limited, Delhi vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi

ITA 4264/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTNAT MEMBER ITA Nos.4216, 4217, 4218, 4219, 4220, 4221, 4222 & 4223/Del/2025 [Assessment Years:2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 : 2019-20 and 2020-21] Sakshi Agarwal, Deputy Commissioner of Income 56, SFS Flats, Ashok Vihar, Tax, Central Circle-28, Room Phase-IV, New Delhi-110052 Vs No.327, ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-110055 PAN-ATWPG1641E Appellant Respondent ITA Nos.4264, 4265, 4266, 4267, 4268, 4269, 4271 & 4272/Del/2025 [Ass…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. Smt. Usha Sharma, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 466/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Revelation Unique Retail & Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Marketing Private Ltd., Tax, Central Circle-3, 5A/3A, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi New Delhi Pin: 1100 02 Pan :Aaicr9933L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

…he AO is satisfied that the material found has a bearing on income computation, initiation of proceedings would be unjustified and mechanical.  The principle has further been affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in DCIT v. U.K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd. [2023] 454 ITR 441 (SC), where it was categorically held that in the absence of incriminating material, additions under Section 153C are impermissible. The Apex Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, reiterating that proceedings under Section 153C cannot be sustained without discovery of incriminating material in the course of search.  The Hon'ble Delhi High Court…

Ocean Dream Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Lucknow vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-1, Lucknow

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 146/LKW/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Agrawal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 68

…various additions made.” ITA Nos. 146 & 147/LKW/2023 Page 6 of 7 5. In view of the foregoing, and respectfully following the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd (supra) and DCIT vs U.K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd (2023) 150 Taxmann.com 108 (SC), and further relying instruction of Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) [Instruction No.1 of 2023 (F. No.279/Misc./M-54/2023-IT)] directing the field authorities to implement the aforesaid orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd (supra) and U.K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd (supra), in uniform manner; we…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Cirlce-2, Ludhiana vs. Rawalpindi Co-Op Cinema Society Ltd, Ludhiana

In the result, the Appeal filed by the department stands dismissed

ITA 552/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 180/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Rawalpindi Co-Op Vs. The Dcit, बनाम Cinema Society Ltd., Central Circle-2, Society Cinema, Ludhiana Ludhiana 141008 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaaar0233K अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 552/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 The Dcit, Vs. Rawalpindi Co-Op Cinema Central Circle-2, बनाम Society Ltd., Ludhiana Society Cinema, Ludhiana 141008 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaaar0233K अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Hybrid Hearing) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 03.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.01.2025

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 153C

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 180/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Rawalpindi Co-op Vs. The DCIT, बनाम Cinema Society Ltd., Central Circle-2, Society Cinema, Ludhiana Ludhiana 141008 "थायी लेखा सं./PAN No: AAAAR0233K अपीलाथ"/ APPELLANT ""यथ"/ REPSONDENT & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 552/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 The DCIT, Vs. Rawalpindi Co-op Cinema Central Circle-2, बनाम Society Ltd., Ludh…

Rawalpindi Co-Op Cinema Society Limited Society Cinema Ludhiana, Punjab, Ludhiana, Punab vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2, Ludhiana, Punjab

In the result, the Appeal filed by the department stands dismissed

ITA 180/CHANDI/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Jan 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 180/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Rawalpindi Co-Op Vs. The Dcit, बनाम Cinema Society Ltd., Central Circle-2, Society Cinema, Ludhiana Ludhiana 141008 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaaar0233K अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 552/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 The Dcit, Vs. Rawalpindi Co-Op Cinema Central Circle-2, बनाम Society Ltd., Ludhiana Society Cinema, Ludhiana 141008 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaaar0233K अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Hybrid Hearing) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 03.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.01.2025

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 153C

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 180/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Rawalpindi Co-op Vs. The DCIT, बनाम Cinema Society Ltd., Central Circle-2, Society Cinema, Ludhiana Ludhiana 141008 "थायी लेखा सं./PAN No: AAAAR0233K अपीलाथ"/ APPELLANT ""यथ"/ REPSONDENT & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 552/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 The DCIT, Vs. Rawalpindi Co-op Cinema Central Circle-2, बनाम Society Ltd., Ludh…

DCIT, Ghaziabad vs. M/S. Devidayal Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad

ITA 4297/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Accountnat Member

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTNAT MEMBER ITA Nos.4216, 4217, 4218, 4219, 4220, 4221, 4222 & 4223/Del/2025 [Assessment Years:2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 : 2019-20 and 2020-21] Sakshi Agarwal, Deputy Commissioner of Income 56, SFS Flats, Ashok Vihar, Tax, Central Circle-28, Room Phase-IV, New Delhi-110052 Vs No.327, ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-110055 PAN-ATWPG1641E Appellant Respondent ITA Nos.4264, 4265, 4266, 4267, 4268, 4269, 4271 & 4272/Del/2025 [Ass…

DCIT, Ghaziabad vs. M/S. Devidayal Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3850/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jan 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2018-19] M.B.Power (Madhya Pradesh) Vs Dcit, Ltd., 239, Okhla Industrial Central Circle-2, Estate, Nehru Place, Gurgaon Delhi -110019. Pan-Aafcm6698A Appellant Respondent

Section 132(4)Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250

…024) 454 ITR 212, Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that “no addition can be made in respect of the completed assessments in absence of any incriminating material.” Observation in para 12 of the judgment is relevant. In DCIT v. U. K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd (2023) 454 ITR 441 (SC), ratio of Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd. (supra) was applied to assessment u/s 153C. Here, the High Court had set aside the assessment u/s 153C for the reason that no incriminating material was found during search. Hon’ble Apex Court upholding the order of the High Court has held that: “As observed hereinabove, as no incriminating material was f…

Shri Chetan Sharma, Kanpur vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Kanpur

In the result, both appeals are allowed

ITA 343/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow06 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

For Appellant: Shri Samrat Chandra, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl
Section 153DSection 263

…sessee either in impugned order under section 263 of the Act or in the assessment order. It is well settled by orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of PCIT Vs Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) and Dy CIT Vs. U. K Paints (Overseas) Ltd 150 Taxmann.com 108 (SC) that no addition can be made in respect of the issues on which no incriminating material has been found during search under section 132 of the Act in the case of the assessee. Thus, impugned order of Ld. PCIT passed under section 132 of the Act is clearly inconsistent with this well settled principle laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Cour…

M/S Metal Impex, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1(1), Chennai

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 805/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.799 To 805/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 To 2020-21 V. M/S. Metal Impex, The Acit, The Lattice, 4Th Floor, Central Circle-1(1), No.20 Waddles Road, Chennai. Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. [Pan: Aamfm 4856 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(2)Section 68

…of any incriminating material found during the course of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A of the Act, 1961.” 33. Following the above judgement (supra), it is noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of DCIT vs U.K. Paints (Overseas) Limited (454 ITR 441) has held that, in absence of any incriminating material which was found from the premise of the third party (searched person), no addition/s is permissible in an unabated assessment u/s 153C of the Act of the assessee (other person). The relevant findings taken note of by us are as follows: “1. In this batch of appeals, the assessments in cas…

M/S Metal Impex, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1(1), Chennai

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 804/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Sept 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.799 To 805/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 To 2020-21 V. M/S. Metal Impex, The Acit, The Lattice, 4Th Floor, Central Circle-1(1), No.20 Waddles Road, Chennai. Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. [Pan: Aamfm 4856 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(2)Section 68

…of any incriminating material found during the course of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A of the Act, 1961.” 33. Following the above judgement (supra), it is noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of DCIT vs U.K. Paints (Overseas) Limited (454 ITR 441) has held that, in absence of any incriminating material which was found from the premise of the third party (searched person), no addition/s is permissible in an unabated assessment u/s 153C of the Act of the assessee (other person). The relevant findings taken note of by us are as follows: “1. In this batch of appeals, the assessments in cas…

M/S Metal Impex, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1(1), Chennai

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 803/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.799 To 805/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 To 2020-21 V. M/S. Metal Impex, The Acit, The Lattice, 4Th Floor, Central Circle-1(1), No.20 Waddles Road, Chennai. Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. [Pan: Aamfm 4856 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(2)Section 68

…of any incriminating material found during the course of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A of the Act, 1961.” 33. Following the above judgement (supra), it is noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of DCIT vs U.K. Paints (Overseas) Limited (454 ITR 441) has held that, in absence of any incriminating material which was found from the premise of the third party (searched person), no addition/s is permissible in an unabated assessment u/s 153C of the Act of the assessee (other person). The relevant findings taken note of by us are as follows: “1. In this batch of appeals, the assessments in cas…

M/S Metal Impex, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1(1), Chennai

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 802/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.799 To 805/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 To 2020-21 V. M/S. Metal Impex, The Acit, The Lattice, 4Th Floor, Central Circle-1(1), No.20 Waddles Road, Chennai. Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. [Pan: Aamfm 4856 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(2)Section 68

…of any incriminating material found during the course of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A of the Act, 1961.” 33. Following the above judgement (supra), it is noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of DCIT vs U.K. Paints (Overseas) Limited (454 ITR 441) has held that, in absence of any incriminating material which was found from the premise of the third party (searched person), no addition/s is permissible in an unabated assessment u/s 153C of the Act of the assessee (other person). The relevant findings taken note of by us are as follows: “1. In this batch of appeals, the assessments in cas…