Durai Murugan Kathir Anand v. Additional\nCommissioner of Income-tax
136 Taxmann.com 70High Court2022#10154 most cited
What is Durai Murugan Kathir Anand v. Additional\nCommissioner of Income-tax authority for?
A sworn statement confessing to unexplained cash found at a taxpayer's premises can be rejected if it lacks supporting evidence and is made by a third party who subsequently applies to the Settlement Commission. The decision is based on the preponderance of probability.
10
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Durai Murugan Kathir Anand v. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax · section 69A · section 144A · section 153A · unexplained cash · sworn statement · preponderance of probability · cash seized · Settlement Commission · rejection of statement