Dr. T.P. Kapadia v. CIT

87 ITR 511Reported decision1973#21511 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2021.

Judgments citing Dr. T.P. Kapadia v. CIT

Dania Oro Jewellery P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 9(3)(1), Mumbai

ITA 7635/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Sh. Rajendra & Ravish Soodआयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./7635/Mum/2014, िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2010-11 आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" M/S.Dania Oro Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., The Income Tax Officer – 9(3)(1), Aayakar Bhavan, Gala No.601 & 602, Block No.I, M.K.Road, Seepz-Sez, Seepz Vs. Mumbai. Andheri (East),Mumbai – 400 096. Pan: Aaccd3214E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri V.Jenardhan, Dr Assessee By: Shri Arati Vissanji सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 11/10/2017 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 03/01/2018 आयकर आयकर अिधिनयम अिधिनयम,1961 क" क" धारा धारा 254(1)केकेकेके अ"तग"त अ"तग"त आदेश आदेश आयकर आयकर अिधिनयम अिधिनयम क" क" धारा धारा अ"तग"त अ"तग"त आदेश आदेश Order U/S.254(1)Of The Income-Tax Act,1961(Act)

For Appellant: Shri Arati VissanjiFor Respondent: Shri V.Jenardhan, DR
Section 143(3)Section 254(1)

…der –Held, yes [Para5] [ In favour of assessee] 6.1 The above decision squarely applies to the present case. This is the only decision of a High Court applicable to the case at hand which has been cited before us. In the case of Dr. T.P. Kapadia vs. CIT[1973] 87 ITR 511 (Mys.) it has been held that a decision of a High Court would have binding force in the State in which it has jurisdiction. 6.2 Even in the case of the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09 (Dania Oro Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO) relied on by the ld. DR,we find that in some of the cases the terms of credit has been 3 ITA/7635/Mum/2014 extende…

Dr. T.P. Kapadia v. CIT (87 ITR 511) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax