Dr. K George Thomas v. CIT

23 Taxmann 46Reported decision#23784 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Judgments citing Dr. K George Thomas v. CIT

DCIT, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad vs. Prakash Nimmagadda, Hyderabad, Secunderabad

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 974/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Dec 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.974/Hyd/2017 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09) Dy.Cit Vs. Shri Prakash Nimmagadda Circle 1(1) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Acbpn4246R (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.C. Devdas, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Meghnath Chowhan, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 06/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 16/12/2024 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Raothis Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order, Dated 20/03/2017 Of The Learned Cit (A)-9, Hyderabad, Relating To A.Y.2008-09. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds:

For Appellant: Shri K.C. Devdas, CAFor Respondent: : Dr. Meghnath Chowhan, CIT(DR)

Section 17(2)(c)Section 28

…ITA No 974 of 2017 Prakash Nimmagadda आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.974/Hyd/2017 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09) Dy.CIT Vs. Shri Prakash Nimmagadda Circle 1(1) Hyderabad Hyderabad PAN:ACBPN4246R (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee by: Shri K.C. Devdas, CA राज" व "ारा/Revenue by:: Dr. Meghnath Chowhan, CIT(DR) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 06/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 16/12/2024 आदेश/ORDER Per Vijay P…

Ramanan Sivaraman Eranath Vengali, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer Int Tax Ward 2(2)(1), Mumbai

Accordingly, the addition of INR 97,32,625/- made by the Assessing Officer is deleted and Ground No. 2 to 4 are allowed in terms of the aforesaid

ITA 807/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Kumar JainFor Respondent: Shri Anil Sant

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 148Section 56

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "I" BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & Ramanan Sivaraman Eranath Vengali, I-203, Ms. EVS Shaina, MIG Colony, Jade Gardens, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400051 [PAN: AAOP7302F] …………. Appellant Income Tax Officer, Vs INT Tax Ward – 2(2)(1), Room No. 1725, 17th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Respondent Mumbai - 400021 …………. Appearance For the Appellant/Assessee : Shri Rajendra Kumar Jain Shri Kunal Lunawat For the Respondent/Department : Shri Anil Sant Date Conclusion of hearing : 12.07.2023 Pronouncement of order…

ITO, WD-7(3), Kolkata vs. M/S Energy Development Compnay Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 797/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Mar 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.797/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2010-2011) Ito Ward-7(3), Kolkata, Vs. M/S Energy Development P-7, Chowringhee Square, Company Limited, R.No.17, 5Th Floor, Kolkata- Edcl House, 1A, Elgin 700 069 Road, Kolkata-700020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabce 6969 K .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : None "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Ms.Vandana Bhandari सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 07/02/2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 03/03/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: ` The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Revenue, Pertaining To The Assessment Year 2010-2011, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Viii, Kolkata, In Appeal No.145/Cit(A)-Viii/Kol/13-14, Dated 27.02.2014, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Ao U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961, (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’), Dated 28.03.2013. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Qua The Assessee Are That The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income Declaring Nil Income On Dated 14.10.2010, For A.Y.2010-11. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Through Cass & The Ao Framed Assessment U/S.143(3) Treating The Forfeited Amount Of Rs.12,40,00,000/- As Revenue Income In Respect Of 75000 Warrants. The Assesse Under Consideration Had Forfeited 75000 Warrant Amounting To Rs. 12,40,00,000/- Allotted To Promoters & Other Investors

For Appellant: Ms.Vandana BhandariFor Respondent: None

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 28

…deration for which the amount has been paid by the developers is, therefore, not really relevant in determining the nature of receipt in the hands of the assessee As held by Hon 'ble Supreme Court, in the "case of Dr. K George Thomas v. CIT [1985] 156 ITR 412/23 Taxmann 46, "the burden is on the revenue to establish that the receipt is of revenue nature" though "once the receipt is found to be of revenue character, whether it comes under exemption or not, it is for the assessee to establish". . . In the instant case the Ld. AO has not discharged its burden by bringing anything on record to prove that the receipt…