Rackspace, Us Inc., Usa vs. DCIT (It) -4(1)(1), Mumbai
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby ordered to be allowed
ITA 6195/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2019AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T. A Nos.6195 & 4920/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2015-16) Rackspace, Us Inc बिधम/ Dcit, (International 1 Fanatical Place, Winderest, Taxation)-4(1)(1), Mumbai Vs. Taxas, Usa Room No.1712, 17Th Floor, C/O Deloitte Haskins & Sells Air India Building, Nariman Llp, Indiabulls Finance Point, Mumbai-400021. Centre, Tower-3, 27Th- 32Nd Floor, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road (W), Mumbai-400013. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaecr7201H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee By: Shri Nitesh Joshi/Milin Thakore Revenue By: Ms. Neha Thakur (Sr. Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 10/10/2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28/11/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Above Mentioned Appeals Against The Direction Of The Disputes Resolution Panel -2, Mumbai Dated 27.06.2018. The Assessment Was Framed By The Dcit (International Tax)- Circle 4(1)(1), Mumbai For The Relevant A.Ys. 2010-11 & 2015- 16 U/S 144C(6) R.W.S. 143(3) Of The I. T. Act. (Hereinafter ‘The Act’).
For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi/Milin ThakoreFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Thakur (Sr. DR)
Section 144C(6)Section 195Section 234Section 234BSection 9
…assessee’s own case(supra) on record:- A.Y.2010-11 & 2015-16 “20. At the outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee stated that the issue is squarely covered by the decision of Hon’ble Bombay High court in the case of DIT(IT) vs. Ngc Network Asia LLC [2009] 313 ITR 187 (Bombay), wherein it is held that when a duty is cast on payer to deduct and pay the tax at source, on payer's failure to do so interest under section 234B of the Act cannot be imposed on payee assessee. Hon’ble High Court held as under: - “5. Under the provisions of the present Act, the issue had come for consideration in the case of CIT v. Sedc…