DIT v. Mitsubishi Corporation

438 ITR 174Supreme Court of India2021#1871 most cited

What is DIT v. Mitsubishi Corporation authority for?

The proviso to section 209(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, inserted by the Finance Act, 2012, which clarified the liability of non-residents to pay advance tax, has prospective effect only. Consequently, non-residents are not liable to pay interest under section 234B for assessment years prior to AY 2012-13.

61

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Also referred to as

DIT v. Mitsubishi Corporation · Section 234B · Section 209(1) proviso · non-resident · advance tax interest · prospective amendment · Finance Act 2012 · AY 2011-12 · AY 2008-09 · Supreme Court 2021

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DIT v. Mitsubishi Corporation

Income Tax Officer, Chennai vs. Rohitkumar Nemchand Piparia, Chennai

The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 1344/CHNY/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Dec 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1344/Chny/2023 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Ito Shri Rohitkumar Nemchand Piparia बनाम International Taxation Ward-2(1) #34 (Old #77), Meddox Street, / Vs. Chennai. Choolai, Chennai-600 112. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Akzpp-0661-M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri T. Banusekar & Ms. Samyuktha Banusekar (Advocates) - Ld. Ars " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri Nilay Baran Som (Cit) - Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07-10-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31-12-2024 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar & Ms. SamyukthaFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 234C

…tory interest. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Anjum B. Ghaswala (252 ITR 1) has held that levy of interest is mandatory in nature and the same cannot be waived-off. 5. The decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mitsubishi Corporation Ltd. (438 ITR 174) is on the interpretation of proviso to Sec. 209(1) issued by Finance Act, 2012 providing that if a non-resident assessee received any amount including tax deductible at source, assessee could not reduce such tax while computing its advance tax. The Hon’ble Court held that the said proviso was applicable after AY 2012-13. It was held by Hon’ble C…