Diageo India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT

34 Taxmann.com 284Reported decision2013#24572 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,631 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2019.

Judgments citing Diageo India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT

Bayer Crop Science Ltd, Mumbai vs. Addl CIT 10(3), Mumbai

ITA 7978/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Sh.Rajendra & C.N. Prasadआयकर अपील सं./Ita/7978/Mum/2010,िनधा"रण वष"/Ay.2006-07 M/S. Bayer Cropscience Limited Acit -10(3) Aayakar Bhavan, 4Th Floor, M.K. Road Bayer House, Central Avenue, Hiranandani Gardens, Powai Vs. Mumbai-400 020. Mumbai-400 076. Pan:Aaacb 9651 K (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue By:Shri G.M. Doss Assessee By: S/Shri Paras Savla; Harsh Shah & Viraj Mehta सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 18.04.2016 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 25.05.2016 आयकर अिधिनयम,1961 की धारा 254(1)के अ"ग"त आदेश Order U/S.254(1)Of The Income-Tax Act,1961(Act) लेखा सद" राजे" के अनुसार Per Rajendra, Am- Challenging The Order Dated 14/10/2010 Of The Assessing Officer (Ao),Passed U/S.143(3)R.W. S.144C(13)Of The Act, The Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal. Assessee-Company,Engaged In The Business Of Manufacturing Of Insecticides & Other Chemicals For Plant Protection,Filed Its Return Of Income On 30/11/2006, Declaring Income Of Rs. 51.18 Crores.During The Assessment Proceedings,The Ao Found That Assessee Had Entered Into International Transactions (It.S) With Its Associated Enterprises(Aes).So,He Made A Reference To The Transfer Pricing Officer (Tpo)To Determine The Arm’S Length Price(Alp) Of Such Transactions. After Receiving The Order Of The Tpo,The Ao Sent The Draft Assessment Order To The Assessee, Who Challenged It Before The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp).The Drp Issue Directions To The Ao Wide Its Order Dated 28/09/2010.In Pursuance Of The Said Directions, The Ao Completed The Assessment, Determining The Income Of The Assessee Had Rs. 59.89 Crores. 2.First Ground Of Appeal Relates To Transfer Pricing (Tp)Adjustments Of Rs. 2.80 Crores.During The Tp Proceedings,The Tpo Found That The Assessee Had Entered Into The Following It.S With Its Aes:

For Appellant: S/Shri Paras Savla; Harsh Shah & Viraj MehtaFor Respondent: Shri G.M. Doss
Section 143(3)Section 254(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई “केकेकेके” खंडपीठ Income-tax Appellate Tribunal -“K”Bench Mumbai सव"ी राजे"",लेखा सद"य एवं सी. एन. "साद,"याियक सद"य Before S/Sh.Rajendra,Accountant Member and C.N. Prasad,Judicial Member आयकर अपील सं./ITA/7978/Mum/2010,िनधा"रण वष"/AY.2006-07 M/s. Bayer CropScience Limited ACIT -10(3) Aayakar Bhavan, 4th floor, M.K. Road Bayer House, Central Avenue, Hiranandani Gardens, Powai Vs. Mumbai-400 020. Mumbai-400 076. PAN:AAACB 9651 K (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue by:Shri G.M. Doss Assessee by: S/Shri Paras Savla; Harsh Shah & Viraj Mehta सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing…

Owens Corning (India) P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cir 7(1), Mumbai

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 8522/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 2007-08 Owens Corning (India) P. Ltd. Dcit Cir 7(1) Alpha Bldg, 7Th Floor, Mumbai- बनाम/ Hiranandani Gardens, Powai Vs. Mumbai-400076 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No.Aaaco1739M "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee By Shri J.D. Mistry & Shri Ketan Ved (Ar) Shri N.K. Chand (Dr) राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By 07/04/2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : आदेश क" तार"ख /Date Of Order: 22/04/2016

Section 92CSection 92C(2)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ,K,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “K”, MUMBAI Before Shri Mahavir Singh, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2007-08 Owens Corning (India) P. Ltd. DCIT CIR 7(1) Alpha Bldg, 7th Floor, Mumbai- बनाम/ Hiranandani Gardens, Powai Vs. Mumbai-400076 (Assessee) (Revenue) P.A. No.AAACO1739M "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee by Shri J.D. Mistry & Shri Ketan Ved (AR) Shri N.K. Chand (DR) राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue by 07/04/2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : आदेश क" तार"ख /Date of Order: 22/04/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ashw…

Diageo India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (34 Taxmann.com 284) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax