Delhi in Suman Poddar v. Income Tax Officer 99

112 Taxmann.com 330Supreme Court of India2019#735 most cited

What is Delhi in Suman Poddar v. Income Tax Officer 99 authority for?

Exemption under Section 10(38) is not allowable for long-term capital gains arising from bogus share transactions involving penny stocks or manipulative dealings. The Income Tax Department can establish such a case based on the preponderance of probabilities where there is no genuine financial worth.

138

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Suman Poddar v. ITO · Suman Poddar SC · Section 10(38) · Section 68 · bogus long term capital gain · penny stock · price rigging · manipulative transactions · capital gains exemption · onus of proof · preponderance of probabilities

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Delhi in Suman Poddar v. Income Tax Officer 99