Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circel-2(1), Bangalore vs. Sri Mathikere Ramaiah Seetharam, Bangalore
In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and the COs filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 544/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Nov 2022AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai
For Appellant: Shri H. Nagin Khincha &For Respondent: Shri M. Mathivanan, D.R
Section 131Section 132(4)Section 153CSection 45(2)
…O)(Delhi)(Trib.) • ACIT .v. Inlay Marketing Pvt. Ltd(2015) 167 TTJ 273 (Delhi)(Trib.) • Pepsi Foods P. Ltd. .v. ACIT (2014) 367 ITR 112 (Delhi)(HC) • CIT .v. Gopi Apartment (2014) 365 ITR 411 (All.)(HC) • DCIT.v. Akash Arogya Mindir P.Ltd. (2015) 167 TTJ 578/ 114 DTR 61 (Delhi)(Trib.) • ACIT v. Surbhi Sen Jindal (2018) 68 ITR 12(SN) (Patna) (Trib.) • Avalanche Reality P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 68 ITR 79 (SN) (Indore)(Trib.) • CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (2015) 378 ITR 84/ 278 CTR 144 (Bom.)(HC) • CIT v. Mechmen (MP)(HC) AYs 2000-01 to 2006-07 I.T.A. No.44/2011, I.T.A. No.45/2011 • DCIT .v. Aakash Arog…