DCIT v. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd.

149 Taxmann.com 332Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2023#925 most cited
115

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd. · Total Oil India Special Bench · Section 115-O · dividend distribution tax · Transfer Pricing · Bright Line Test · AMP expenditure · Cost Plus Method · CUP method · Section 90 · DTAA · Refunds · Section 237 · Section 239 · ITAT Mumbai Special Bench

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DCIT v. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd.

Sennheiser Electronics India Private Limited, Gurgaon vs. Circle-4(1), Gurgaon

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1942/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Us, The Only Effective Issue To Be Decided In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Nfac Was Justified In Not Granting Refund Of The Dividend Distribution Tax (Ddt) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Instant Case. 4. We Have Heard The Rival Submissions & Perused The Materials Available On Record. The Assessee Is Engaged In The Business Of Sales & Distribution Of Headphones, Microphones, Monitoring Systems, Tour Guide Systems & Aviation Headsets. It Imports Goods From Sennheiser Group Companies For Reselling Through Its Distributors In India. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2019-20 Was Filed By The Assessee Company On 27.11.2019 Which Was Later Revised On 09.03.2020 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.3,77,00,470/-. 5. During The Year Under Consideration The Assessee Distributed Dividends To Its Share Holders (Senniheiser Global Operations Gmbh, Germany & Sennheiser Electronic Gmbh & Co. Kg

Section 115Section 143(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’: NEW DELHI BEFORE, SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sennheiser Electronics Circle – 4 (1) India Private Limited Gurgaon 104, ABC,Time Tower, Sector-28, M. G. Road, Gurgaon -122002 PAN No.AAKCS4629Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Ms. Poonam Ahuja, Advocate Respondent by Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 16/11/2023 Date of 28/11/2023 Pronouncement ORDER PER M. BALAGANESH, AM: This appeal of the Assessee arises out of the order of the CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [hereinafter referr…

Accenture Solutions P Ltd (Asol), Mumbai vs. Addl/Jt/ Dy/CIT/Asstt/ITO, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi & the Dy CIT, Circle-14(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1255/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Amarjit Singhaccenture Solutions Vs. Additional/Joint/Deputy/ Private Limited (‘Asol’) Assistant Commissioner Plant 3, Godrej & Boyce Of Income Tax/Income- Complex, Phirojshah Tax Officer, National Nagar, Vikhroli West, Facelless Assessment Off L.B.S Marg, Centre, Delhi Mumbai – 400079 The Dcit, Circle 14(1)(1) स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaach3235M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Nishant Thakkar/ Hiten Chande/ Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala Respondent By : Azhar Zain Vayal Parambath Date Of Hearing 22.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 13.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (Am): This Appeal Filed By The Assesse Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ao (National Assessment Centre) Mumbai- 2, Dated 18.03.2021 For A.Y. 2016-17 As Per The Direction Of The Drp Issued U/S 144C (5) Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Before Us: “On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Learned Ao Transfer Pricing Officer (Tpo), Based On The Directions Of The Hon'Ble Drp Has: General Ground 1. Erred In Assessing The Total Income Of The Appellant At Rs.2888,33,73,016 Against A Total Income Of Rs.2179,39,30,620 As Reported By The Appellant In Its Revised Return Of Income & Determining A Demand Of Rs.2186,98,55,847 Payable By The Appellant.

For Appellant: Nishant Thakkar/ Hiten Chande/For Respondent: Azhar Zain Vayal Parambath
Section 144CSection 92CSection 92C(3)

…P a g e | 1 Accenture Solutions Private Limited Vs. Add/Joint/Deputy/ACIT/ITO IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Accenture Solutions Vs. Additional/Joint/Deputy/ Private Limited (‘ASOL’) Assistant Commissioner Plant 3, Godrej & Boyce of Income Tax/Income- Complex, Phirojshah tax Officer, National Nagar, Vikhroli West, Facelless Assessment Off L.B.S Marg, Centre, Delhi Mumbai – 400079 The DCIT, Circle 14(1)(1) स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAACH3235M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Nishant Thak…