DCIT v. Panna Corporation

74 DTR 89High Court2012#1691 most cited

What is DCIT v. Panna Corporation authority for?

When unaccounted cash or on-money receipts are detected, only the profit element embedded in such receipts is taxable, not the entire gross amount, and this profit requires estimation.

67

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Panna Corporation · Panna Corporation · 74 DTR 89 · on-money receipt · unaccounted cash receipt · profit embedded · estimation of profit · section 145(3) · rejection of books · business income.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DCIT v. Panna Corporation

Chandigarh Royale City Promoters Private Limited, Chandigarh vs. Jao DCIT/ACIT/JCIT (OSD) Central Circle-1, Chandigarh

In the result, all the above appeals are partly allowed

ITA 1270/CHANDI/2025[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Mar 2026AY 2021-2022

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं . / ITA No. 1269 To 1272/Chd/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Το 2023-24 Chandigarh Royale City Promoters बनाम JAO DCIT/ACIT/JCIT (OSD) Central Private Limited, Circle-1, Chandigarh-160017 SCO-44, Sector-20C, Chandigarh स्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AAECC3999H अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 1273 Το 1275/Chd/ 2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2020-21, 2021-22 & 2023-2

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 144BSection 148Section 151A

…tten submissions relied upon the further following arguments:- "The finding of the CIT(A) is contradictory in the sense that the seized data had to be considered in totality and there is judgment of Gujarat High in the case of 'Panna Corporation' reported in 74 DTR 89 (Guj.) and in the case of Navjeevan Oil Mills, reported in 252 ITR 417, wherein, The Hon'ble Court has held that seized material cannot be dissected selectively, but must be considered in its entirety. The same view has been taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of 'Bilhari Investment Pvt. Ltd.' 299 ITR 1, wherein, it has been held that, w…