DCIT v. K H Arinf Pvt Ltd.

64 Taxmann.com 409Reported decision2015#25416 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2022.

Judgments citing DCIT v. K H Arinf Pvt Ltd.

Mr. Manoharlal Tandon, Mumbai vs. ACIT_9(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5334/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Apr 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Gagan Goyalmr. Manoharlal Tandon Vs. Acit – 9(1)(1) Plot No.35 (Pr), C-2, Aayakar Bhavan, Tandon Beach House, M.K.Road, Azad Road, Santacruz (W) Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400049 Pan/Gir No. : Aaapt2929F Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Dr. K Shivram.Ar Respondent By : Mr.T. Shankar.Dr Date Of Hearing 13.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 25.04.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Thane Passed U/S 143(3) & 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Filed The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Dr. K Shivram.ARFor Respondent: Mr.T. Shankar.DR
Section 10(34)Section 14Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 94(7)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mr. Manoharlal Tandon Vs. ACIT – 9(1)(1) Plot No.35 (PR), C-2, Aayakar Bhavan, Tandon Beach House, M.K.road, Azad Road, Santacruz (W) Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400049 PAN/GIR No. : AAAPT2929F Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Dr. K Shivram.AR Respondent by : Mr.T. Shankar.DR Date of Hearing 13.04.2022 Date of Pronouncement 25.04.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…

DCIT v. K H Arinf Pvt Ltd. (64 Taxmann.com 409) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax