DCIT v. Electronics for Imaging India P. Ltd.

70 Taxmann.com 299Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2016#2252 most cited

What is DCIT v. Electronics for Imaging India P. Ltd. authority for?

For transfer pricing purposes, companies engaged in functionally different activities, such as payroll processing versus software development, are not comparable and must be excluded from the list of comparables.

51

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Electronics for Imaging India P. Ltd. · 70 Taxmann.com 299 · transfer pricing · comparable companies · functional similarity · software development · payroll processing services · exclusion of comparables · arm's length price · FAR analysis

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DCIT v. Electronics for Imaging India P. Ltd.

M/S. Esi Software (India) Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 2, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 34/BANG/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Nov 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm It(Tp)A No.34/Bang/2020 : Asst.Year 2010-2011 M/S.Esi Software (India) Pvt.Ltd. The Income Tax Officer 24-25, 27Th Cross, Banashankari Ward 11(1) V. 2Nd State, Bangalore – 560 070. Bengaluru. Pan : Aabce2943C. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate Respondent By : Smt.Priyadarshini Besaganni, Jcit-Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 25.11.2021 Date Of Hearing : 24.11.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, Jm This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Cit(A)’S Order Dated 10.10.2019. The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2010-2011. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Several Grounds & Sub- Grounds. However, During The Course Of Hearing, The Learned Ar Had Only Pressed Grounds 4.5 & 4.12. The Grounds 4.5 & 4.12 Read As Follows:-

For Appellant: Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Priyadarshini Besaganni, JCIT-DR
Section 10ASection 143(2)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE Before Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM IT(TP)A No.34/Bang/2020 : Asst.Year 2010-2011 M/s.ESI Software (India) Pvt.Ltd. The Income Tax Officer 24-25, 27th Cross, Banashankari Ward 11(1) v. 2nd State, Bangalore – 560 070. Bengaluru. PAN : AABCE2943C. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate Respondent by : Smt.Priyadarshini Besaganni, JCIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 25.11.2021 Date of Hearing : 24.11.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, JM This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed a…