DCIT v. Cosmo Films Ltd.

139 ITD 628Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#2420 most cited

What is DCIT v. Cosmo Films Ltd. authority for?

The balance 50% of additional depreciation, for new machinery or plant put to use for less than 180 days in the year of acquisition, is allowable in the immediately succeeding assessment year. The second proviso to Section 32(1)(iia) restricts only the allowance for the first year, not the total benefit.

48

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,469 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2024.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Cosmo Films Ltd. · 139 ITD 628 · Section 32(1)(iia) · additional depreciation · balance 50% additional depreciation · less than 180 days use · subsequent year allowance · spillover depreciation · second proviso to Section 32(1)(iia)

Also reported as

24 Taxmann 189124 Taxmann.com 189

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DCIT v. Cosmo Films Ltd.

JCIT Cent. Cir. - 1(4), Mumbai vs. Grasim Industries Ltd, Mumbai

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1559/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2010-11 Grasim Industries Limited, The Dcit Cc-1(4), Corporate Finance Division, Room No. 902, 9Th Floor, Old Vs. A-2, Aditya Birla Centre, S.K. Cgo Building, M.K. Road, Ahire Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400030. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2010-11 Jcit (Osd), Central Circle- Grasim Industries Limited, 1(4), A-Wing, 2Nd Floor, Aditya Room No. 902, Pratishtha Vs. Birla Centre, S.K. Ahire Bhavan, 9Th Floor, Old Cgo Marg, Worli, Building Annexe, Mumbai-400030. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Yogesh Thar & Mr. Chaitanya Joshi Revenue By : Dr. Kishor Dhule, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 03/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 29/04/2024

For Appellant: Mr. Yogesh Thar &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DR
Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 153C

…TC Rolling Mills P. Ltd. us. ACIT (Order dated 13.05.2013 No. 2789/Mum/2012) (Mumbai ITAT) No. 2789/Mum/2012) (Mumbai ITAT) e) Apollo Tyres Ltd Vs ACTT (64 SOT 203) (Cochin ITAT) Apollo Tyres Ltd Vs ACTT (64 SOT 203) (Cochin ITAT) f) DCIT Vs Cosmos Films Ltd (139 ITD 628)(Delhi ITAT) DCIT Vs Cosmos Films Ltd (139 ITD 628)(Delhi ITAT) g) AMIT Vs SIL Investments Ltd. (148 TTJ 213)(Delhi ITAT) AMIT Vs SIL Investments Ltd. (148 TTJ 213)(Delhi ITAT) h) Century Enka Limited Vs DCIT (154 ITD 426)(Kolkatta Century Enka Limited Vs DCIT (154 ITD 426)(Kolkatta ITAT) ITAT) 24.4 In view of the above discu 24.4 In view of the…