Vodafone Digilink Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi
In the result, appeal of the assessee Ground Nos 9 & 10 is allowed
ITA 1169/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Feb 2025AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Prabhash Shankar
For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwalla/wShriFor Respondent: Ms. Vatsala Jha (PCIT)
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 144C(5)Section 35ASection 36(1)(m)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 43(1)
…e impugned payment and also the viability of the same. There should not be any doubt that these aspects are normally considered by the management of the company while making business decisions.......". "... 8. In the case of Dy. CIT v. Ekla Appliances [2011] 45 SOT 7 (Delhi) (URO), the TPO determined the ALP for the royalty payment to be Nil, primarily on the ground that the assessee has not been benefited from the technical Know how and the assessee was incurring losses continuously. The Hon'ble ITAT approved the observations made by the learned CIT(A) in that case in the following lines: "14.2 In this regard,…