ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Bharti Teletech Ltd., New Delhi
In the result, both the appeal of the Department as well as
ITA 3873/DEL/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 May 2016AY 2004-05
Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotra & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaay: 2004-05 Acit Vs Bharti Teletech Ltd., Circle 2(1), D-195, Room No. 398D, Okhla Industrial Area Phase I, C.R. Building, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aabcb3989M) C.O. No. 72/Del/2014 (In Ita No. 3873/Del/2012) Ay: 2004-05 Bharti Teletech Ltd., Vs Acit, Circle 2(1), New Delhi. New Delhi. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Dr Respondent By: Shri Amit Bhalla, Ca Date Of Hearing: 17.02.2016 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.05.2016
For Appellant: Shri S.L. Anuragi, DRFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bhalla, CA
Section 147Section 2(47)Section 45Section 48
…odwill from the start. It is generated as the business is carried on and may be augmented with the passage of time. Lawson in his Introduction to the Law of Property describes it as property of a highly peculiar kind. In CIT v. Chunilal Prabhudas & Co. [1970] 76 ITR 566 the Calcutta High Court reviewed the different approaches to the concept (pp.577, 578): "It has been horticulturally and botanically viewed as “a seed sprouting‟ or an “acorn growing into the mighty oak of goodwill‟. It has been geographically described by locality. It has been historically described by locality. It has been historically explained…