ITO, New Delhi vs. Sh. Sunil Nayyar, Delhi
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and Cross
ITA 6168/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Feb 2020AY 2012-13
Bench: Sh. Kuldip Singhdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6168/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Vs Sh. Sunil Nayyar, Ward-49(3), R/O 81-A, Vikrant Enclave, New Delhi Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Abvpn3963B
For Appellant: Sh. Jagdish Ajmani, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Saras Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 68
…of the assessee. Without these findings book result cannot be disturbed. K.N. Ramchandra Naidu vs. CIT ITA No. 47 /PNJ/ e. "If there is no finding that books of accounts are incomplete or incorrect, accounts cannot be rejected. "CIT v. Rajni Kant Dave [2006] 281 ITR 6 (Ali)”, if there is no finding that income could not be deduced from the accounts maintained by the assessee, then rejection of accounts would be invalid, "Juggilai Kamlapat Udyog Ltd. v. CIT [2005] 278 ITR 522 (Cal,)". Unless there is a finding against the assessee that his income, profits and gains could not properly be deduced from his method of…