Commissioner of Income Tax v. Orchid Industries (P.) Ltd.

116 Taxmann.com 113Supreme Court of India2020#9313 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income Tax v. Orchid Industries (P.) Ltd. authority for?

The assessee discharges the onus of proving the genuineness of share application money transactions by furnishing documents like PANs, confirmations, and bank statements, even if the applicants do not appear before the Assessing Officer.

11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v Orchid Industries · section 68 · share application money · onus of proof · genuineness of transaction · creditworthiness of lender · identity of lender · cash credit · unexplained cash credit · accommodation entry

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax v. Orchid Industries (P.) Ltd.

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida vs. M/S Rudra Buildwell Homes Pvt. Ltd, Delhi

ITA 602/DEL/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2016-17 Vs. M/S. Rudra Buildwell Homes Dcit, Central Circle-I, Noida Pvt. Ltd., 53, Okhla Phase, Delhi Pan: Aafcr6959P (Appellant) (Respondent) With C.O. No.106/Del/2025 [Arising Out Of Ita No.602/Del/2025] Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Rudra Buildwell Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-I, Homes Pvt. Ltd., Noida A-66, Sector-63, Noida Pan: Aafcr6959P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Rohit Kapoor, Adv. Sh. Veersen Agarwal, Itp Department By Sh. Rajesh Chandra, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 12.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29.08.2025 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm This Revenue’S Appeal Ita No.602/Del/2025 & Assessee’S Cross Objection C.O. No. 106/Del/2025 For Assessment Year 2016-

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151(1)Section 151(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 Vs. M/s. Rudra Buildwell Homes DCIT, Central Circle-I, Noida Pvt. Ltd., 53, Okhla Phase, Delhi PAN: AAFCR6959P (Appellant) (Respondent) With C.O. No.106/Del/2025 [Arising out of ITA No.602/Del/2025] Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. Rudra Buildwell Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-I, Homes Pvt. Ltd., Noida A-66, Sector-63, Noida PAN: AAFCR6959P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Rohit Kapoor, Adv. Sh. Veersen Agarwal, ITP Department by Sh.…

Nu Pharmalogics Private Limited, Secunderabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-16(2), Hyderabad

In the result, both the appeals in ITA

ITA 1165/HYD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.1165/Hyd/2019 & 302/Hyd/2017 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 & 2012-13) Nu Pharmalogics (P) Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Ward-16(2) Pan:Aaccn2913J Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Spg Mudaliar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 23/12/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 28/02/2025

For Appellant: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri SPG Mudaliar, DR
Section 143(2)

…cision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lovely Exports Pvt Ltd (216 CTR 195) as well as the judgments in the cases of Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex (96 Taxmann.com 469), Page 14 of 24 ITA Nos 1165 and 302 NU Pharmalogics P Ltd Orchird Industries (116 Taxmann.com 113) and Chain House International (P) Ltd (103 Taxmann.com 435). 17. On the other hand, the learned DR has submitted that once the Assessing Officer has received the information from the Investigation Wing that these companies are working as conduit of Shri Shirish C. Shah who was found involved in providing accommodation entries of Long-Te…

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Orchid Industries (P.) Ltd. (116 Taxmann.com 113) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax