Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd.

342 ITR 169High Court2012#87 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. authority for?

To make an addition under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits, the Assessing Officer must conduct proper inquiry into the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the creditor, especially concerning share application money. The assessee's initial discharge of burden by providing necessary details shifts the onus back to the AO for further investigation, including the source of source.

658

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Nova Promoters and Finlease · 342 ITR 169 · Section 68 · cash credit · share application money · identity genuineness creditworthiness · onus of proof · Assessing Officer inquiry · source of source · paper company · accommodation entry · Section 131

Also reported as

18 Taxmann.com 217

Sections most often in play

Section 68Section 5(2)Section 147Section 143(3)Section 9Section 148Section 6Section 131

Issues it is cited on

paper companyshare capital and share premiumsource of sourcecreditworthiness of the creditorshare application moneyentry operatorlive linkaddition u/s 68addition under section 68accommodation entrysection 131genuineness of the transaction

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd.

R. Kantilal & Co., Mumbai vs. DCIT, CC-6(1), Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 7090/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

R. Kantilal & Co., Mumbai vs. DCIT, CC-6(1), Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 7089/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

R. Kantilal & Co., Mumbai vs. DCIT, CC-61(1), Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 7088/MUM/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

DCIT CC -5(1), Mumbai vs. M/S. R. Kantilal & Company, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6779/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

DCIT CC -5(1), Mumbai vs. M/S. R. Kantilal & Company, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6778/MUM/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

DCIT, CC - 5(1), Mumbai vs. Parag Suresh Kothari, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6773/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

DCIT, CC - 5(1), Mumbai vs. Parag Suresh Kothari, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6772/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

DCIT, CC- 5 (1), Mumbai vs. Pratik Suresh Kothari, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6761/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

DCIT, CC 5 (1), Mumbai vs. Pratik Suresh Kothari, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6759/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

DCIT, CC- 5 (1), Mumbai vs. Pratik Suresh Kothari, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6757/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.7088 To 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/S R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. Dcit, Cc-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19Th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra Building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aacfr5384C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Dharm Veer Singh &
Section 153ASection 68

…14 Appeals 1 M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.7088 to 7090/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-13) M/s R. Kantilal & Co. Vs. DCIT, CC-6(1) Tower-F(W),Office No. Income Tax Office, 7030, Bharat Diamond 19th Floor, Air India Bourse, Block, Bandra building, Nariman Point, Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 021 Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACFR5384C Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.6772 to 6776/Mum/2018 (A.Ys. 2009-10 to…

Asstt. CIT-CC-1(1), Mumbai vs. Ajit Sohanlal Jain, Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by revenue are dismissed

ITA 641/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 153ASection 68

…ered in light of surrounding circumstances, normal course of human conduct and preponderance of probability. 3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT (A) erred in not appreciating the decision in Nova Promoters and Finlease 342 ITR 169 (2012) wherein the Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that mere filing of PAN, ITRs, account confirmations and bank statements of the creditors is not sufficient enough to discharge the onus cast upon the assessee u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when there are sufficient evidences of accommodation entry. 4. Whether on the facts and circumstances of…

Asstt. CIT, CC-1(1), Mumbai vs. Ajit Sohanlal Jain, Mumbai

In the result, appeals filed by revenue are dismissed

ITA 536/MUM/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 153ASection 68

…ered in light of surrounding circumstances, normal course of human conduct and preponderance of probability. 3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT (A) erred in not appreciating the decision in Nova Promoters and Finlease 342 ITR 169 (2012) wherein the Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that mere filing of PAN, ITRs, account confirmations and bank statements of the creditors is not sufficient enough to discharge the onus cast upon the assessee u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when there are sufficient evidences of accommodation entry. 4. Whether on the facts and circumstances of…

DCIT, CC-7(3), Mum, Bai, Mumbai vs. M/S. Nishrin Trading and Investment Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed and the cross objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 6125/MUM/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh () & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153CSection 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) & SMT. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA 6125/Mum/2019 (Assessment year 2008-09) Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax- vs M/s Nishrin Trading and CC-7(3), Mumbai, Room No.655 Investment Pvt Ltd, Ground Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Sir Navroji Vakil Street, Grant Mumbai-400 020 Road, Mumbai-400 007 PAN : AAACN1760J CROSS OBJECTOR RESPONDENT C.O. 42/Mum/2021 (Arising out of ITA 6125/Mum/2019) (Assessment year 2008-09) Assessee represented by Shri Rushabh Mehta, CA Department represented by Shri Dh…

Gmr Air Cargo & Aerospace Engineering Ltd(Successor to Gmr Hyderabad Air Cargo & Logistics Pvt Ltd), Shamshabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 183/HYD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad14 Sept 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2008-09 Gmr Air Cargo & Vs. Ito,Ward-2(3) Aerospace Engineering Signature Towers Ltd.(Successor To Gmr Kondapur, Kothaguda Hyderabad Air Cargo & Opp. Botanical Gardens Logistics Pvt Ltd.) R.R.District Rajiv Gandhi International Hyderabad-500 084 Airport, Samshabad Hyderabad-500 409

For Appellant: Shri K.C.DevdasFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, Sr.AR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 37

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2008-09 GMR Air Cargo and Vs. ITO,Ward-2(3) Aerospace Engineering Signature Towers Ltd.(Successor to GMR Kondapur, Kothaguda Hyderabad Air Cargo and Opp. Botanical Gardens Logistics Pvt Ltd.) R.R.District Rajiv Gandhi International Hyderabad-500 084 Airport, Samshabad Hyderabad-500 409 PAN : AACCD8269K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri K.C.Devdas Revenue by: Shri Kumar Aditya, Sr.AR Date of hearing: 08.09.2022 Date of pronouncement:…

Vinod Kumar Gupta, Uttarpradesh vs. Circle-1(1)(1), Meerut

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 664/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Surender Pal, CIT DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 254Section 263

…rem Castings (P.) Ltd. Vs. CIT[2017] 88 taxmann.com 189 (Allahabad) 5. CIT vs. MAF Academy (P.) Ltd. (361 ITR 258) 6. CIT vs. Navodaya Castle Pvt. Ltd. [2014] 367 ITR 306 (Del) 7. CIT vs. Nova Promoters & Finlease (P) Ltd. (18 taxmann.com 217, 206 Taxman 207, 342 ITR 169, 252 CTR 187) 8. CIT vs. N.R. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 339 (Delhi)/[2014] 222 Taxman 157 (Delhi) (MAG)/[2014] 264 CTR 258 (Delhi) 1. After considering the rival submissions and on perusal of the material placed on record before us, we find that before the Assessing Officer. Assessee has filed income tax return and copies of bank…

Sharad Vithoba Navale, Solapur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle -2 (2), Pune

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 266/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godarashri Dadasaheb Vithoba Navale Dcit, Central Circle 2(2) At Post Ekhatpur Pune Vs. Taluka - Sangola Distt. Solapur 413307 Pan –Abppn6740E Appellant Respondent Shri Sharad Vithoba Navale Dcit, Central Circle 2(2) At Post Ekhatpur Pune Vs. Taluka - Sangola Distt. Solapur 413307 Pan –Abppn6740E Appellant Respondent Appellant By: Shri Suhas Bora Respondent By: Shri M.G. Jasnani Date Of Hearing: 28.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 25.08.2022 O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, Jm These Twin Assessees’ As Many Appeals For Assessment Year 2012-13, Arise Against The Cit(A)-12, Pune’S Separate Orders; Both Dated 30.11.2018, Passed In Case Nos. No. Pn/Cit (A)-12/10778/2016-17 & No. Pn/Cit (A)- 12/10800/2016-17, Respectively Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short “The Act”.

For Appellant: Shri Suhas BoraFor Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 148

…bank account, as having come to the notice of the Assessing Officer through AIR, can be reason enough for holding the belief that income has escaped assessment. She has relied upon the decisions in the cases of CIT Vs Nova Promoters & Finlease Pvt Ltd [(2012)342 ITR 169] but then none of the questions before Hon’ble High Court had anything to do with reopening of assessment and this decision cannot, therefore, be taken as an authority on the legal issue which did not even come up for specific adjudication before Their Lordships. As for her reliance on Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of Phool Chand B…

Dadasaheb Vithoba Navale, Solapur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle -2 (2), Pune

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 255/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godarashri Dadasaheb Vithoba Navale Dcit, Central Circle 2(2) At Post Ekhatpur Pune Vs. Taluka - Sangola Distt. Solapur 413307 Pan –Abppn6740E Appellant Respondent Shri Sharad Vithoba Navale Dcit, Central Circle 2(2) At Post Ekhatpur Pune Vs. Taluka - Sangola Distt. Solapur 413307 Pan –Abppn6740E Appellant Respondent Appellant By: Shri Suhas Bora Respondent By: Shri M.G. Jasnani Date Of Hearing: 28.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 25.08.2022 O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, Jm These Twin Assessees’ As Many Appeals For Assessment Year 2012-13, Arise Against The Cit(A)-12, Pune’S Separate Orders; Both Dated 30.11.2018, Passed In Case Nos. No. Pn/Cit (A)-12/10778/2016-17 & No. Pn/Cit (A)- 12/10800/2016-17, Respectively Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short “The Act”.

For Appellant: Shri Suhas BoraFor Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 148

…bank account, as having come to the notice of the Assessing Officer through AIR, can be reason enough for holding the belief that income has escaped assessment. She has relied upon the decisions in the cases of CIT Vs Nova Promoters & Finlease Pvt Ltd [(2012)342 ITR 169] but then none of the questions before Hon’ble High Court had anything to do with reopening of assessment and this decision cannot, therefore, be taken as an authority on the legal issue which did not even come up for specific adjudication before Their Lordships. As for her reliance on Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of Phool Chand B…

M/S Kuldeep Glass and Aluminium, Mumbai vs. ITO 29(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, in our considered opinion the order of the Ld

ITA 2171/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Gagan Goyal

For Appellant: Sh. Riteshkumar Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Sh.Vijay Kumar Soni, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 7140/Mum/2018 (A.Y. 2010-11) M/s Kuldeep Glass and Aluminium, Shop No.16, Hansa Villa, Opp. Vijay Nagar, Mulund (West), Mumbai-400080 PAN: AAAFK6708M ...... Appellant Vs. ITO-23(2)(4), Mumbai. ..... Respondent M/s Kuldeep Glass and Aluminium, Shop No.16, Hansa Villa, Opp. Vijay Nagar, Mulund (West), Mumbai-400080 PAN: AAAFK6708M ...... Appellant Vs. ITO-29(2)(1), Rom No. 201, 2nd Floor, C-10, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400051. ..... Respondent ITO-29…

Kuldeep Glass and Aluminium, Mumbai vs. ITO 23 (2)(4), Mumbai

In the result, in our considered opinion the order of the Ld

ITA 7139/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Gagan Goyal

For Appellant: Sh. Riteshkumar Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Sh.Vijay Kumar Soni, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 7140/Mum/2018 (A.Y. 2010-11) M/s Kuldeep Glass and Aluminium, Shop No.16, Hansa Villa, Opp. Vijay Nagar, Mulund (West), Mumbai-400080 PAN: AAAFK6708M ...... Appellant Vs. ITO-23(2)(4), Mumbai. ..... Respondent M/s Kuldeep Glass and Aluminium, Shop No.16, Hansa Villa, Opp. Vijay Nagar, Mulund (West), Mumbai-400080 PAN: AAAFK6708M ...... Appellant Vs. ITO-29(2)(1), Rom No. 201, 2nd Floor, C-10, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400051. ..... Respondent ITO-29…

DCIT, Bangalore vs. Shri. Sumir J Hinduja, Bangalore

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue and COs filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1374/BANG/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Jul 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Jagadish N. Hinduja Deputy Commissioner Of Income- No.7 & 12, Industrial Suburb Tax Tumkur Road Vs. Circle 11(3) Yeshwanthpur Bangalore Bangalore 560 022 Pan No.Aacph7291Q Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Sumir J. Hinduja Deputy Commissioner Of Income- No.7 & 12, Industrial Suburb Tax Tumkur Road Vs. Circle 11(3) Yeshwanthpur Bangalore Bangalore 560 022 Pan No.Aaeph5197H Appellant Respondent C.O. No.48/Bang/2013 (Arising Out Of Ita No.1373/Bang/2012) Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Jagadish N. Hinduja Vs. Dcit, Circl-11(3),Bangalore Appellant Respondent C.O. No.49/Bang/2013 (Arising Out Of Ita No.1374/Bang/2012) Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Sumir J. Hinduja Vs. Dcit, Circl-11(3),Bangalore Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Susan Dolores George, D.R. Respondent By : Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.R.

For Appellant: Shri Susan Dolores George, D.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.R
Section 147Section 148Section 2(22)(e)

…ITA Nos.1373 & 1374/Bang/2012 & CO. Nos.48 & 49/Bang/2013 Shri Jagadish N. Hinduja, Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Jagadish N. Hinduja Deputy Commissioner of Income- No.7 & 12, Industrial Suburb tax Tumkur Road Vs. Circle 11(3) Yeshwanthpur Bangalore Bangalore 560 022 PAN No.AACPH7291Q APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Sumir J. Hinduja Deputy Commissioner of Income- No.7 & 12, Industrial Suburb tax Tumkur Road Vs. Circle 11(3) Yeshwanthpur Ba…