Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd.

342 ITR 169High Court2012#87 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. authority for?

To make an addition under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits, the Assessing Officer must conduct proper inquiry into the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the creditor, especially concerning share application money. The assessee's initial discharge of burden by providing necessary details shifts the onus back to the AO for further investigation, including the source of source.

658

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Nova Promoters and Finlease · 342 ITR 169 · Section 68 · cash credit · share application money · identity genuineness creditworthiness · onus of proof · Assessing Officer inquiry · source of source · paper company · accommodation entry · Section 131

Also reported as

18 Taxmann.com 217

Sections most often in play

Section 68Section 5(2)Section 147Section 143(3)Section 9Section 148Section 6Section 131

Issues it is cited on

paper companyshare capital and share premiumsource of sourcecreditworthiness of the creditorshare application moneyentry operatorlive linkaddition u/s 68addition under section 68accommodation entrysection 131genuineness of the transaction

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd.

ITO, Ward-10(4), Kolkata vs. M/S Positive Properties Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 2274/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Jan 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 68

…e following decisions: (i) CIT vs. N. R. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. (2014) 222 Taxmann 157 (Del) para 24 & 25. (ii) CIT vs. N. Tarika Properties Investments ITA NO.2080 of2010 Delhi High Court dtd.21.11.13. (iii) CIT vs. Nova Promoters and Finlease Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 342 ITR 169 (Del). (iv) Visakha Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT (2014) 52 taxmann.com 305. Citing the aforesaid judicial precedents, the ld DR want us to over-turn the decision of ld CIT(A) impugned beforeus. 10. Coming to the instant case, we note that the assessee had raised share capital of Rs.68,200/- during the year and also the share premium of Rs.3,40,31,80…

M/S Kota Dall Mill, Kota vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Kota

ITA 998/JPR/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Dec 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal & Shri Gulshan Agarwal (CAs)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B(1)(b)Section 68

….......................... ……..……………………………………………………………………………………… 11. We have heard the Senior Standing counsel for the Revenue, who has relied upon decisions of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. [2012] 342 ITR 169 (Delhi), Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. N.R. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 97 (DB) (Del) and Commissioner of Income Tax-II Vs. MAF Academy P. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 277 (DB) (Del). The aforesaid decisions mentioned above refer to the earlier decisions of Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sophia Finance Ltd., [1994] 205 ITR 98…

M/S Kota Dall Mill, Kota vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Kota

ITA 997/JPR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Dec 2018AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal & Shri Gulshan Agarwal (CAs)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B(1)(b)Section 68

….......................... ……..……………………………………………………………………………………… 11. We have heard the Senior Standing counsel for the Revenue, who has relied upon decisions of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. [2012] 342 ITR 169 (Delhi), Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. N.R. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 97 (DB) (Del) and Commissioner of Income Tax-II Vs. MAF Academy P. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 277 (DB) (Del). The aforesaid decisions mentioned above refer to the earlier decisions of Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sophia Finance Ltd., [1994] 205 ITR 98…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Kota vs. M/S Kota Dall Mill, Kota

ITA 1057/JPR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Dec 2018AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal & Shri Gulshan Agarwal (CAs)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B(1)(b)Section 68

….......................... ……..……………………………………………………………………………………… 11. We have heard the Senior Standing counsel for the Revenue, who has relied upon decisions of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. [2012] 342 ITR 169 (Delhi), Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. N.R. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 97 (DB) (Del) and Commissioner of Income Tax-II Vs. MAF Academy P. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 277 (DB) (Del). The aforesaid decisions mentioned above refer to the earlier decisions of Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sophia Finance Ltd., [1994] 205 ITR 98…

M/S Kota Dall Mill, Kota vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Kota

ITA 999/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Dec 2018AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal & Shri Gulshan Agarwal (CAs)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B(1)(b)Section 68

….......................... ……..……………………………………………………………………………………… 11. We have heard the Senior Standing counsel for the Revenue, who has relied upon decisions of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd. [2012] 342 ITR 169 (Delhi), Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. N.R. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 97 (DB) (Del) and Commissioner of Income Tax-II Vs. MAF Academy P. Ltd., 206 (2014) DLT 277 (DB) (Del). The aforesaid decisions mentioned above refer to the earlier decisions of Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sophia Finance Ltd., [1994] 205 ITR 98…

M/S Aerens Buildwell Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5073/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Dec 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu[Assessment Years: 2008-09]

For Appellant: Shri Vivek Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goel, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 234BSection 68

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘A’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Years: 2008-09] AERENS BUILDWELL LTD., Vs. ACIT, CC-18, C/O BGJC & ASSOCIATES, NEW DELHI RAJ TOWER, G-1, ALAKHNANDA COMMUNITY CENTRE, NEW DELHI – 110 019 (PAN: AACCA3045N) [Appellant] [RESPONDENT] Assessee by : Shri Vivek Bansal, Adv. Revenue by : Shri Sanjay Goel, CIT(DR) ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal filed by the assessee is preferred against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals]-25, New Delhi dated 28.6.2016 relating…

M/S Aerens Buildwell Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5072/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Dec 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu[Assessment Year: 2007-08]

For Appellant: Shri Vivek Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goel, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 234BSection 68

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘A’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Year: 2007-08] AERENS BUILDWELL LTD., Vs. ACIT, CC-18, C/O BGJC & ASSOCIATES, NEW DELHI RAJ TOWER, G-1, ALAKHNANDA COMMUNITY CENTRE, NEW DELHI – 110 019 (PAN: AACCA3045N) [Appellant] [RESPONDENT] Assessee by : Shri Vivek Bansal, Adv. Revenue by : Shri Sanjay Goel, CIT(DR) ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal filed by the assessee is preferred against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals]-25, New Delhi dated 28.6.2016 relating to…

Paras Kumar Jain, Jaipur vs. ITO, Kota

ITA 279/JPR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 Dec 2018AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri N. Kataria (CA)For Respondent: Shri Jai Singh (JCIT)
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR Jh fot; iky jkWo] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM AND SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 279/JP/2017 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2008-09. cuke Shri Paras Kumar Jain, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. 65, New Grain Mandi, Ward 1(3), Kota. Kota. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN No. ABKPJ 1406 G vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri N. Kataria (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri Jai Singh (JCIT) l…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S Signature Build Well Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 4249/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh[Assessment Year: 2006-07] The Ito Vs. Signature Build Well Pvt. Ltd. Ward-23(4) , 25/33. Iiird Floor, New Delhi East Patel Nagar, New Delhi Pan : Aajcs5402N

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Naina Soin Kapil, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘D’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER [Assessment Year: 2006-07] The ITO Vs. Signature Build Well Pvt. Ltd. Ward-23(4) , 25/33. IIIrd Floor, New Delhi East Patel Nagar, New Delhi PAN : AAJCS5402N Date of Hearing : 06.12.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 12.12.2018 Assessee by : Shri Salil Aggarwal, Adv Shri Shailesh Gupta, CA Revenue by : Smt. Naina Soin Kapil, Sr. DR ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, AM:- This appeal by the Revenue and is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Ap…

Srm Securities Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circle- 25, Delhi

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 7825/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishim/S. Srm Securities Pvt. Ltd, Dcit, Vs. 2608 To 2613 & 2637, Plot No. Central Circle-25, 252 & 253, Gurudwara Road, New Delhi Karol Bagh, New Delhi Pan: Aaocs5259G (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…TR 306, Konark structural engineering private limited vs DCIT 90 taxmann.com 56, Prem casting private limited vs CIT, 88 taxmann.com 189, along with the decision of the honourable Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. Nova promoters and Finlease private limited 342 ITR 169. In the end he referred to the decision of the honourable Delhi High Court in case of principal Commissioner of income tax vs. Bikram Singh. 9. We have carefully considered the rival contention and perused the orders of the lower authorities. Admittedly the assessee has issued share capital to 13 companies in the range of INR 4,000,000 to INR 2,5…

M/S. Sangyon Automotive Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Meerut

In the result, ITA Nos.2991 & 2992/Del/2015 are partly allowed and ITA

ITA 2993/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Dec 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri G.C. Srivastava &For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2991 to 2993/Del/2015 Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2008-09 M/s Sangyon Automotive Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 14D, 14th Floor, Hansalaya, Central Circle, 15, Barakhamba Road, Bhainsali Road, New Delhi. Meerut. PAN: AAGCS5366L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.C. Srivastava & Shri Suvinay K. Dash, Advocates Revenue by : Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 13.09.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 10.12.2018 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: The above batch…

M/S. Sangyon Automotive Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Meerut

In the result, ITA Nos.2991 & 2992/Del/2015 are partly allowed and ITA

ITA 2992/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri G.C. Srivastava &For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2991 to 2993/Del/2015 Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2008-09 M/s Sangyon Automotive Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 14D, 14th Floor, Hansalaya, Central Circle, 15, Barakhamba Road, Bhainsali Road, New Delhi. Meerut. PAN: AAGCS5366L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.C. Srivastava & Shri Suvinay K. Dash, Advocates Revenue by : Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 13.09.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 10.12.2018 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: The above batch…

M/S. Sangyon Automotive Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Meerut

In the result, ITA Nos.2991 & 2992/Del/2015 are partly allowed and ITA

ITA 2991/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Dec 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri G.C. Srivastava &For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2991 to 2993/Del/2015 Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2008-09 M/s Sangyon Automotive Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 14D, 14th Floor, Hansalaya, Central Circle, 15, Barakhamba Road, Bhainsali Road, New Delhi. Meerut. PAN: AAGCS5366L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.C. Srivastava & Shri Suvinay K. Dash, Advocates Revenue by : Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 13.09.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 10.12.2018 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: The above batch…

ITO, Ward-10(4), Kolkata vs. M/S Dreamz Met Construction Projects Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2047/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A T Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am] I.T.A No. 2047/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Ito, Ward-10(4), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Dreamz Met Construction Projects Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aagcm 2068 R ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri D.S. Damle, FCA
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…fore us. In our considered opinion, for this reason alone, there cannot be any addition u/s 68 of the Act in the facts of the instant case. We find that the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Novo Promoters and Finelease Pvt. Ltd. reported in 342 ITR 169 (Del) vehemently relied upon by the ld. DR before us, is not applicable in the instant case, as in the facts before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, the notices u/s 133(6) have not been duly complied with. Hence the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case referred to supra is not applicable to the facts of the instant case and…

ITO, Ward-10(4), Kolkata vs. M/S Tanish Dealers Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1636/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A T Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am] I.T.A No. 1636/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Ito, Ward-10(4), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Tanish Dealers Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aadct 1242 K ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri D.S. Damle, FCA
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…fore us. In our considered opinion, for this reason alone, there cannot be any addition u/s 68 of the Act in the facts of the instant case. We find that the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Novo Promoters and Finelease Pvt. Ltd. reported in 342 ITR 169 (Del) vehemently relied upon by the ld. DR before us, is not applicable in the instant case, as in the facts before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, the notices u/s 133(6) have not been duly complied with. Hence the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case referred to supra is not applicable to the facts of the instant case and…

Uma Singal, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Centrl Circle-3, New Delhi

ITA 1484/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Dec 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S S Rana CIT DR
Section 10(38)Section 143Section 153ASection 250Section 68

…T Vs Navodaya Castle Pvt. Ltd. (2014) 367 ITR 306 (Del.) xxix. Konark Structural Engineering (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (2018) 90 Taxmann.com 56 (Bom.) xxx. CIT Vs Nipun Builders & Developers (P.) Ltd. 350 ITR 407 (Del.) xxxi. CIT Vs Nova Promoters & Finlease (P) Ltd. 342 ITR 169 (Del.) xxxii. CIT Vs Ultra Modern Exports (P.) Ltd. 40 Taxmann.com 458 (Del.) xxxiii. CIT Vs Frostair (P.) Ltd. 26 Taxmann.com 11 (Del.) xxxiv. CIT N R Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 29 Taxmann.com 291 (Del.) xxxv. PCIT Vs Bikram Singh in ITA No. 55/2017 (Del.) 102. 22. The ld. CIT DR reiterated the observations made by the ld. CIT(A) in para 5.6.1…

Ritu Singal, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle- 3, New Delhi

ITA 1481/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Dec 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S S Rana CIT DR
Section 10(38)Section 143Section 153ASection 250Section 68

…T Vs Navodaya Castle Pvt. Ltd. (2014) 367 ITR 306 (Del.) xxix. Konark Structural Engineering (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (2018) 90 Taxmann.com 56 (Bom.) xxx. CIT Vs Nipun Builders & Developers (P.) Ltd. 350 ITR 407 (Del.) xxxi. CIT Vs Nova Promoters & Finlease (P) Ltd. 342 ITR 169 (Del.) xxxii. CIT Vs Ultra Modern Exports (P.) Ltd. 40 Taxmann.com 458 (Del.) xxxiii. CIT Vs Frostair (P.) Ltd. 26 Taxmann.com 11 (Del.) xxxiv. CIT N R Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 29 Taxmann.com 291 (Del.) xxxv. PCIT Vs Bikram Singh in ITA No. 55/2017 (Del.) 102. 22. The ld. CIT DR reiterated the observations made by the ld. CIT(A) in para 5.6.1…

ITO, Ward-10(4), Kolkata vs. Ms Savera Towers Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2275/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A T Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am] I.T.A No. 2275/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Ito, Ward-10(4), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Savera Towers Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aaocs 9744 C ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Manish Tiwari, AR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…ion u/s 68 of the Act as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Orissa Corporation Pvt. Ltd. reported in 159 ITR 78 (SC). We find that the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Novo Promoters and Finelease Pvt. Ltd. reported in 342 ITR 169 (Del) vehemently relied upon by the ld. DR before us, is not applicable in the instant case, as in the facts before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, the notices u/s 133(6) have not been duly complied with. Hence the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case referred to supra is not applicable to the facts of the instant case and…

M/S. Sherawali Yarns Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Meerut

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2996/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2005-06 Sherawali Yarns Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit, 14D, 14Th Floor, Hansalaya, Central Circle, 15, Barakhamba Road, Bhainsali Road, New Delhi. Meerut. Pan: Aaics3421L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.C. Srivastava & Shri Suvinay K. Dash, Advocates Revenue By : Shri S.S. Rana, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2018 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 11Th March, 2015 Of The Cit(A), Meerut, Relating To Assessment Year 2005-06. 2. The Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In The Business Of Trading & Investment In Shares. It Filed Its Return Of Income On 19Th September, 2005 Declaring Loss Of Rs.320/-. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & In Response To Notice U/S 143(2) Dated 20Th September, 2006 & Notice U/S 142(1) Dated 3Rd August, 2007, The Counsel Of The Assessee Appeared Before The Assessing Officer

For Appellant: Shri G.C. Srivastava &For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2005-06 Sherawali Yarns Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 14D, 14th Floor, Hansalaya, Central Circle, 15, Barakhamba Road, Bhainsali Road, New Delhi. Meerut. PAN: AAICS3421L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.C. Srivastava & Shri Suvinay K. Dash, Advocates Revenue by : Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 13.09.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 30.11.2018 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 11th Mar…

M/S. Roseberry Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Meerut

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2995/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2008-09 Roseberry Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit, 14D, 14Th Floor, Hansalaya, Central Circle, 15, Barakhamba Road, Bhainsali Road, New Delhi. Meerut. Pan: Aabcr3485J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.C. Srivastava & Shri Suvinay K. Dash, Advocates Revenue By : Shri S.S. Rana, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2018 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 10Th March, 2015 Of The Cit(A), Meerut, Relating To Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. The Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is A Company & Derives Income From Interest On Loans & Advances Granted By It As An Nbfc & Profit On Sale Of Mutual Funds. The Return Of Income Was Filed On 6Th November, 2008 Declaring Total Income Of Rs. Nil. The Return Was Processed U/S 143(1) On 8Th July, 2009. Subsequently, The Case Was Reopened U/S 147 After Duly Recording The Reasons In Writing. In Response To Notice U/S 148 Of The It Act Dated 23Rd October, 2009, The Assessee Submitted To Treat The Original Return As Return Filed In Compliance To Notice U/S 148 Of The It Act, 1961. Subsequently, The Assessing Officer Completed The Assessment U/S 147/143(3) On 31St December, 2009 Determining The Total Income At Rs.73,510/- Wherein He Made Certain Additions By Disallowing Stt Debited To P&L Account, Income-Tax Debited, Disallowance U/S 14A & Preliminary Expenses.

For Appellant: Shri G.C. Srivastava &For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09 Roseberry Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 14D, 14th Floor, Hansalaya, Central Circle, 15, Barakhamba Road, Bhainsali Road, New Delhi. Meerut. PAN: AABCR3485J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.C. Srivastava & Shri Suvinay K. Dash, Advocates Revenue by : Shri S.S. Rana, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 13.09.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 30.11.2018 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 10t…