Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mechmen

60 Taxmann.com 484High Court2015#798 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mechmen authority for?

For initiating proceedings under Section 153C against a person other than the one searched, the Assessing Officer (AO) must mandatorily record satisfaction that seized assets/documents belong to that other person. This satisfaction is a jurisdictional prerequisite, even if the AO for both the searched person and the other person is the same.

129

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mechmen · Section 153C · mandatory satisfaction · AO jurisdiction · common AO · seized assets · other person assessment · search assessment · Section 132

Also reported as

380 ITR 591233 Taxmann 540280 CTR 198

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mechmen

Krupa Land Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 39, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 632/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Oct 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Nk Pradhan, Am The Jt. Commissioner Of Krupa Land Limited Income Tax (O.S.D), Cc-39, 11, B-Wing, Mittal Towers, Mumbai Free Press Journal Marg, Vs. R. No. 32(1), Ground Floor, Nariman Point, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 021 Mumbai-400 020 Appellant .. Respondent Pan No. Aadck1521E Krupa Land Limited Dy. Commissioner Of 11 ‘B’ Wing, Mittal Tower Income Tax, Cc-39 Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 Mumbai 021 Appellant .. Respondent Pan No. Aadck1521E Revenue By .. Shri Anadi Varma, Cit Dr Assessee By .. Shri Vijay Mehta, Ar Date Of Hearing .. 27-09-2017 Date Of Pronouncement .. 11-10-2017

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 143CSection 153C

…is satisfaction that the assets / documents seized belonged to a person i.e. the assessee, other than the Krupa Land Limited (A.Y:2008-09) searched person. This view is finally settled by Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Mechmen (2016) 380 ITR 591 (MP) wherein the view is expressed in the following manner :- “18. The concomitant of this conclusion, is that, the legal position as applicable to Section 158BD regarding satisfaction in the first instance of the first Assessing Officer forwarding the items to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction; and in the second instance of the Assessin…

DCIT CC 39, Mumbai vs. Krupa Land Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 605/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Oct 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Nk Pradhan, Am The Jt. Commissioner Of Krupa Land Limited Income Tax (O.S.D), Cc-39, 11, B-Wing, Mittal Towers, Mumbai Free Press Journal Marg, Vs. R. No. 32(1), Ground Floor, Nariman Point, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 021 Mumbai-400 020 Appellant .. Respondent Pan No. Aadck1521E Krupa Land Limited Dy. Commissioner Of 11 ‘B’ Wing, Mittal Tower Income Tax, Cc-39 Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 Mumbai 021 Appellant .. Respondent Pan No. Aadck1521E Revenue By .. Shri Anadi Varma, Cit Dr Assessee By .. Shri Vijay Mehta, Ar Date Of Hearing .. 27-09-2017 Date Of Pronouncement .. 11-10-2017

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 143CSection 153C

…is satisfaction that the assets / documents seized belonged to a person i.e. the assessee, other than the Krupa Land Limited (A.Y:2008-09) searched person. This view is finally settled by Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Mechmen (2016) 380 ITR 591 (MP) wherein the view is expressed in the following manner :- “18. The concomitant of this conclusion, is that, the legal position as applicable to Section 158BD regarding satisfaction in the first instance of the first Assessing Officer forwarding the items to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction; and in the second instance of the Assessin…