DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Bokaro Power Supply Co. Ltd., New Delhi
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 3692/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2017AY 2010-11
Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2010-11 Vs. Dcit, Circle -3(1), New Delhi M/S. Bokaro Power Supply Co. Ltd., Ispat Bhavan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi Pan : Aabcb8976G (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Vs. M/S. Bokaro Power Supply Co. Dcit, Circle -3(1), New Delhi Ltd., 4Th Floor, Ispat Bhavan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi Pan : Aabcb8976G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. M.P. Rastogi, Adv. & Sh. Anil Sharma, Agm Respondent By Sh. Sandip Kumar Mishra, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 11.10.2017 Date Of Pronouncement 31.10.2017 Order Per O.P. Kant, A.M.:
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 43B
…the Hon’ble Supreme Court (Supra), where it was held that where the amount paid is partly penal and partly compensatory, the amount to the extent that is compensatory could be allowed as deduction & jurisdictional High Court in CIT Vs, Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd 193 ITR 597, that penalty for delayed payment of sales tax is not a deductible expenditure, addition to the extent of Rs.86,72,759/- is hereby sustained while additional payment of Sales Tax liability of Rs.35,45,033/- is hereby directed to be deleted. The appellant shall get part relief on this ground of appeal.” 6.1 Before us, the Ld. counsel of the asses…