Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ken Construction and Colonizers (P.) Ltd.

20 Taxmann.com 381High Court2012#17146 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 350,364 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2024.

Also reported as

208 Taxmann 478

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ken Construction and Colonizers (P.) Ltd.

Anil Kumar Paik, Kolkata vs. ACIT, Cir-8(1), Kol, Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 492/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 492/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Anil Kumar Paik Acit, Circle-8(1), Kolkata C/O S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Advocates Vs 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor Suite No. 203 Off Hare Street Kolkata - 700001 [Pan : Aflpp6567R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate Revenue By : Shri B.K. Singh, Jcit, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29/02/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 15/03/2023, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. For That The Ld. Commissioner, Of Income Tax (Appeals)- N.F.A.C. Acted Unlawfully In Impliedly Sustaining; The Purported Addition Of Rs. 1,67.44,907/- Made The Ld. Assistant Commissioner, Of Income Tax, Circle 8(1) Kolkata By Invoking The Mischief U/S. 43Ca Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Without Satisfying The Parameters Thereof & The Adverse Conclusion Reached On That Behalf In Violation Of The Statutory Prescription Is Completely Unfounded, Unjustified & Untenable In Law. 2. For That The Specious Approach Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-N.F.A,C. Of Misreading Evidence, Considering Improper Facts

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B.K. Singh, JCIT, Sr. D/R
Section 145Section 250Section 43C

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 492/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Anil Kumar Paik ACIT, Circle-8(1), Kolkata C/o S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Advocates Vs 2, Garstin Place, 2nd Floor Suite No. 203 Off Hare Street Kolkata - 700001 [PAN : AFLPP6567R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate Revenue by : Shri B.K. Singh, JCIT, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 01/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of…

Anil Kumar Paik, Kolkata vs. ACIT, Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed partly for statistical purposes

ITA 468/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 468/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Anil Kumar Paik Acit, Circle-8(1), Kolkata C/O S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Advocates Vs 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor Suite No. 203 Off Hare Street Kolkata - 700001 [Pan : Aflpp6567R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate Revenue By : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. Cit, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21/09/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29/11/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 15/03/2023, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. D/R
Section 143(2)Section 145(3)Section 250Section 43CSection 44A

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "यायपीठ, कोलकाता | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 468/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Anil Kumar Paik ACIT, Circle-8(1), Kolkata C/o S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Advocates Vs 2, Garstin Place, 2nd Floor Suite No. 203 Off Hare Street Kolkata - 700001 [PAN : AFLPP6567R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate Revenue by : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 21/09/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /D…

Shaktiraj Holding and Construction, Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward 5(1), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 272/KOL/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.272/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shaktiraj Holding & Construction P Ltd...........................……….……Appellant C/O. S. N. Ghosh & Associates, Advocates, 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor, Suite No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata-1. [Pan: Aadcs7143J] Vs. Ito, Ward-5(1), Kolkata...……….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Manas Mondal, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : July 26, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : July 26, 2022

Section 250Section 50C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B(SMC)” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.272/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shaktiraj Holding and Construction P Ltd...........................……….……Appellant C/o. S. N. Ghosh & Associates, Advocates, 2, Garstin Place, 2nd Floor, Suite No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata-1. [PAN: AADCS7143J] vs. ITO, Ward-5(1), Kolkata...……….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Manas Mondal, Addl. CIT-DR, appeared on behalf…

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ken Construction and Colonizers (P.) Ltd. (20 Taxmann.com 381) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax