Strides Arcolab Ltd, Navi Mumbai vs. Asst Cir 10(3), Mumbai
In the result, the appeals assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 8614/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jun 2018AY 2007-08
Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Strides Shasun Limited The Asst. Commissioner Of (Formerly Known As Strides Income Tax Circle 10(3), Arcolab Limited) 201, Mumbai Vs. Devavrata, Sector 17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai-400 703 Appellant .. Respondent Pan No. Aadcs8104P
For Appellant: Percy J. Pardiwala &For Respondent: Jayant Kumar &
Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 1O
…o, since otherwise legislature would not have wasted their energy by adding that term in juxtapostition with the term manufacture. This is elucidated by the judgment of Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT v. Air Survey Co. of India (P.) Ltd. [1998] 232 ITR 707. The question before Hon'ble Calcutta High Court was whether business of surveying, mapping and aerial 19 photography which resulted in photographs was production of article or thing. Revenue had rejected assessee's claim for investment allowance on the ground that the activity of the assessee could not be called as manufacture or production and…