Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Historic Resort Hotels

31 Taxmann.com 7High Court2013#17622 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,254 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2024.

Sections most often in play

Section 115JBSection 143(3)Section 154Section 80IC

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Historic Resort Hotels

Om Infra Limited, Jaipur Rajasthan vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, Jaipur, Rajasthan

In the result, we find no substantial question of law being involved in this appeal

ITA 811/JPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. A. S. Nehra (Addl. CIT)
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 80Section 801C(2)(b)Section 80I

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 811/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2015-16 cuke Om Infra Limited, DCIT, Vs. Om Tower, M. I. Road Church Central Circle-01, Jaipur Road, LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAACO 8245 J vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. A.…

Income Tax Officer, Bangalore vs. Late Smt. Lakshmamma, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1696/BANG/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Feb 2019AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Vp & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Respondent: Miss Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, VP & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM ITA No.1693/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1694/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Sri.A.S.Narayana Raju Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalore. Sri.S.N.Ravi Kumar No.401, Stanberry Court No.12, 60 Feet Road Sanjayanagar Bangalore – 560 094. PAN :ADPPN5795H. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.1695/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1696/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Smt.Lakshmamma Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalor…

Income Tax Officer, Bangalore vs. Late Smt. Lakshmamma, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1695/BANG/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Feb 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Vp & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Respondent: Miss Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, VP & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM ITA No.1693/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1694/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Sri.A.S.Narayana Raju Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalore. Sri.S.N.Ravi Kumar No.401, Stanberry Court No.12, 60 Feet Road Sanjayanagar Bangalore – 560 094. PAN :ADPPN5795H. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.1695/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1696/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Smt.Lakshmamma Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalor…

Income Tax Officer, Bangalore vs. Late Sri.A.S.Narayana Raju, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1694/BANG/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Feb 2019AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Vp & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Respondent: Miss Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, VP & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM ITA No.1693/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1694/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Sri.A.S.Narayana Raju Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalore. Sri.S.N.Ravi Kumar No.401, Stanberry Court No.12, 60 Feet Road Sanjayanagar Bangalore – 560 094. PAN :ADPPN5795H. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.1695/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1696/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Smt.Lakshmamma Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalor…

Income Tax Officer, Bangalore vs. Late Sri.A.S.Narayana Raju, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1693/BANG/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Feb 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Vp & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Respondent: Miss Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE Before Shri N.V.Vasudevan, VP & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM ITA No.1693/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1694/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Sri.A.S.Narayana Raju Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalore. Sri.S.N.Ravi Kumar No.401, Stanberry Court No.12, 60 Feet Road Sanjayanagar Bangalore – 560 094. PAN :ADPPN5795H. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.1695/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2006-2007 ITA No.1696/Bang/2016 :Asst.Year2007-2008 The Income Tax Officer Late Smt.Lakshmamma Ward 6(3)(2) Vs. Represented by L/R Bangalor…