Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Nagpur v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)

69 Taxmann.com 407High Court2016#617 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Nagpur v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) authority for?

The Commissioner (Appeals) cannot dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution; the law does not empower them to do so. The appeal must be decided on merits and in writing, stating points for determination, decision, and reasons.

159

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Nagpur v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) · section 250 · section 251 · CIT(A) power · dismiss appeal non-prosecution · reasoned order · section 250(6) · section 251(1)(a)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Nagpur v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)

Lokesh, Hapur vs. ITO, Ward-2(3)(5), Hapur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose in the terms aforesaid

ITA 2399/DEL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसं.2399/िद"ी/2024 (िन.व. 2012-13) Smt. Lokesh (W/O Boby Singh) L/H Boby Singh, 136, Tehsil Chopla, Near Water Tank, Garhmukteshwar, Hapur, Up 245205 ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan: Axgps-1907-F बनाम Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), Meerut Road, Adarash Nagar Colony, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Madhuban Colony, Up 245101 अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant By : None "ितवादी"ारा/Respondent By : Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" ितिथ/ Date Of Hearing : 09/12/2024 घोषणा क" ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncement : : 09/12/2024 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Cit(A)') Dated 08.03.2024, For Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. A Perusal Of The Impugned Order Reveals That The Cit(A) Had Issued Notices To The Assessee On Four Occasions On Email Address Provided By The Assessee/Appellant But There Was No Response From The Assessee Side. Hence, The Cit(A) Dismissed Appeal For Non-Prosecution. It Is No More Res Integra That The Cit(A) Has No Power To Dismiss Appeal For Non-Prosecution [Re. Cit Vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (Huf) 69 Taxmann.Com 407 (Bom)]. The Provisions Of Section 250 R.W.S 251 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act')

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 250

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण िद"ी पीठ “एस एम सी”, िद"ी "ी िवकास अव"थी, "ाियक सद" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “SMC”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आअसं.2399/िद"ी/2024 (िन.व. 2012-13) Smt. Lokesh (W/o Boby Singh) L/H Boby Singh, 136, Tehsil Chopla, Near Water Tank, Garhmukteshwar, Hapur, UP 245205 ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant PAN: AXGPS-1907-F बनाम Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), Meerut Road, Adarash Nagar Colony, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Madhuban Colony, UP 245101 अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant by : None "ितवादी"ारा/Respondent by : Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Sr. DR सुनवाई क" ितिथ/ Date of heari…