Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

267 ITR 272Supreme Court of India2004#135 most cited

What is Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. authority for?

CBDT and CBEC circulars, along with administrative instructions, are binding on departmental authorities, who must not act in contravention of them. However, these circulars and instructions are not binding on courts or assessees.

501

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,735 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. · 267 ITR 272 · CBDT circulars binding on department · CBEC circulars binding on department · administrative instructions · departmental authorities bound · not binding on assessee · not binding on court · Section 119 Income-tax Act

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

ACIT, Cir-1, Jalpaiguri vs. Smt Sushila Devi Agarwala, Siliguri

Appeal is dismissed for involving lower than the prescribed minimum tax effect

ITA 401/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Oct 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2011-12 Acit, Circle-1, V/S. Smt. Sushila Dvi Agarwala, Ground Floor, Mangal Palace, Ram C.R.Buildng, Race Krishna Road, Ashrampara, Course Para Naya Siliguri-734001 Busti, Jalpaiguri- [Pan No.Acrpa 8812 B] 735101 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit-Sr-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant None ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 11-10-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 12-10-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2011-12 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Jalpaiguri’S Order Dated 27.02.2015, Passed In Case No.04/Cit(A)/Jal/2014-15, Deleting Deemed Dividend Addition Of ₹34,29,340/-, In Proceedings U/S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Case Called Twice. None Appear At The Assessee’S Behest. It Is Accordingly Proceeded Ex Parte. 2. It Is Seen At The Outset That The Tax Effect On The Disputed Additions Before Us Is Less Than Rs. 20 Lacs In Cases I.E. Less Than The Prescribed Revised Threshold Limit In Cbdt’S Latest Circular No. 3/2018 Dated

Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “C” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “C” KOLKATA Before Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member and Dr. A.L. Saini, Accountant Member Assessment Year :2011-12 ACIT, Circle-1, V/s. Smt. Sushila Dvi Agarwala, Ground Floor, Mangal Palace, Ram C.R.Buildng, Race Krishna Road, Ashrampara, Course Para Naya Siliguri-734001 Busti, Jalpaiguri- [PAN No.ACRPA 8812 B] 735101 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-SR-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant None ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 11-10-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 12-10-2018 घोषणा क" ता…

I.T.O., Ward-12(2), Kolkata vs. M/S Touchstone Dealtrade Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2162/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Ito, Wd-12(2), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Touchstone Dealtradesnts Pvt. Ltd. Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, 58A, Raja Basant Roy Road, Kolkata – 700 069. Kolkata – 700 029. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aadct 7503 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. Appellant By : Shri A. Bhattacharjee, Addl. Cit Respondent By : Shri S. Agarwal, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 18/07/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement: 04/09/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Revenue Pertaining To Assessment Year 2012-13, Are Directed Against An Order Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata, Dated 26.08.2016. 2. At The Outset, It Was Brought To Our Notice By The Ld. Ar That The Appeal Preferred By The Revenue Is Struck By The New Circular Of Cbdt I.E. Circular No. 3/2018 Dated 11.07.2018, Wherein The Cbdt Has Directed The Department To Withdraw/Not Press The Appeal, Before The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Itat), If The Tax Effect Is Less Than Rs.20 Lacks. The Cbdt Has Issued Circular No. 3/2018 Dated 11.07.2018, Whereby The Monetary Limits For Filing Of Appeals By The Department Before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & High Courts & Slp Before Supreme Court Have Been Increased As A Measure For Reducing Litigation. The Revised Monetary Limits Laid Down In Para-3 Of This Circular & The Manner Of Computing Tax Effect As Laid Down In Para-4 Of This Circular Are As Follows: “3 . Henceforth, Appeals/ Slps Shall Not Be Filed In Cases Where The Tax Effect Does Not Exceed The Monetary Limits Given Hereunder: Sl. No. Appeals/Slp’S In Income-Tax Matters Monetary Limit (In Rs) 1. Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000/- 2. Before High Court 50,00,000/- 3. Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000/-

For Appellant: Shri A. Bhattacharjee, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri S. Agarwal, Advocate

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D”, BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JM & DR. A.L. SAINI, AM ITO, Wd-12(2), Kolkata Vs. M/s. Touchstone Dealtradesnts Pvt. Ltd. Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, 58A, Raja Basant Roy Road, Kolkata – 700 069. Kolkata – 700 029. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AADCT 7503 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. Appellant by : Shri A. Bhattacharjee, Addl. CIT Respondent by : Shri S. Agarwal, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : 18/07/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement: 04/09/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini, AM: The captioned ap…