Coal Co. Ltd.-1971 (1) SCC 309 10. Authorised Officer, State Bank of Travancore & Anr. v. Mathew K.C

3 SCC 85Reported decision2018#7835 most cited

What is Coal Co. Ltd.-1971 (1) SCC 309 10. Authorised Officer, State Bank of Travancore & Anr. v. Mathew K.C authority for?

A High Court should generally not entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution if an alternative statutory remedy is available, unless there are well-defined exceptions.

14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2023.

Also referred to as

Authorised Officer · State Bank of Travancore & Anr. v. Mathew K.C · writ petition · Article 226 · alternative statutory remedy · High Court · discretionary jurisdiction · CIT v. Chhabil Dass Agarwal

Judgments citing Coal Co. Ltd.-1971 (1) SCC 309 10. Authorised Officer, State Bank of Travancore & Anr. v. Mathew K.C

Coal Co. Ltd.-1971 (1) SCC 309 10. Authorised Officer, State Bank of Travancore & Anr. v. Mathew K.C (3 SCC 85) — Cited in 14 Judgments | BharatTax