CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd.

282 ITR 263High Court2006#616 most cited

What is CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd. authority for?

An employer making a bona fide estimate of taxable salary income is acting in accordance with established legal precedent.

159

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Also referred to as

CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd · section 192 · bona fide estimate of salary · employer estimate · taxable salary · salary income · TDS provisions · employer responsibility

Sections most often in play

Section 10(5)Section 192Section 201(1A)Section 201(1)Section 201

Issues it is cited on

section 201(1)(1a)section 192(1)section 10(5)section 221principal officersection 192section 201(1a)section 22childassessee in defaultsection 201(1)section 201

Judgments citing CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd.

M/S Kptcl, Bangalore vs. ITO(OSD(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2395/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Hubli vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2394/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Hubli vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2393/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Hubli vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2392/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Hubli vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2391/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Bangalore vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2390/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Bangalore vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2389/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Belgaum vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2388/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Belgaum vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2387/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Bangalore vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2386/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Bangalore vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2385/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Tumkur vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2384/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Tumkur vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2383/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Mysore vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2382/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Mysore vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2381/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Tumkur vs. ITO (OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2380/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/S Kptcl, Tumkur vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2379/BANG/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 17(1)(va)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries…

M/.S Kptcl, Davangere vs. ITO(OSD)(TDS)Ltpu, Bangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2223/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

Section 201Section 201(1)

…xable in the hands of the employee is made by the employer, is the ratio of the following decisions. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd [2007] 292 ITR 636 (P&H) CIT vs. HCL Info System Ltd. [2006] 282 ITR 263 (Del) CIT v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2002] 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd [2001] 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v Nestle India Ltd (2000) 243 ITR 0435 (DEL) Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 140 ITR 832 (MP) ITO v G. D. Goenka Public School (No. 2) [2008] 306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) ITA Nos.2223 to 2300/…

State Bank of India, Jaipur vs. ACIT, Jaipur

In the result, we confirm the findings of the ld CIT(A) and the appeal of

ITA 145/JPR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Mar 2017AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Smt. Neelam Ashok(C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Prem Prakash Meena(JCIT)
Section 10(5)Section 201(1)

…201.In this regard, the Bank relies on, inter alia, the following judicial precedents: • Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd. v. CIT (140 ITR 832) (Madhya Pradesh High Court) • CIT v. Nestle India Ltd. (243 ITR 435) (Delhi High Court) • CIT v. HCL Infor System Ltd. (282 ITR 263) (Delhi High Court) • LIC of India v. ACIT (Writ Tax No. 619 to 621 of 2009) (Allahabad High Court) • CIT v. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (254 ITR 121) (Gujarat High Court) • CIT v. I.T.C. Ltd. (220 Taxman 414) (Allahabad High Court) • Lintas India Ltd. v. ACIT (5 SOT 310) (Mumbai ITAT). 7.18 The Bank also places reliance on the following…