CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.

312 ITR 254Supreme Court of India2009#45 most cited

What is CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd. authority for?

Foreign exchange fluctuations, whether gains or losses, are inextricably linked to the underlying business transaction and must be accounted for under the mercantile system. The Supreme Court also affirmed the standard accounting principle of valuing stock at cost or net realisable value, whichever is lower.

968

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 372,010 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Woodward Governor · 312 ITR 254 · Section 37(1) · Section 43A · Section 145(3) · foreign exchange fluctuation · mercantile system of accounting · stock valuation · closing stock · revenue expenditure

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.

ACIT, New Delhi vs. C 1 India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 418/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla & Dr. B.R.R.Kumarआयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 615 To 618/Del/2013 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2007-08 To 2009-10 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" C-1 India Pvt.Ltd., D-5, Defence Colony, New Delhi. …...........अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan-Aabcc4078L Vs Acit, Central Circle-13, …………. ू"यथ" / Respondent New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153CSection 271(1)(c)

…the order of Assessing Officer. 22. The case of the assessee before us is that the loss suffered by the assessee was an item of expenditure to be allowed u/s 37(1) of the Act. In this regard, reliance was placed on the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble [2009] 312 ITR 254(SC) and various other decisions. ITA Nos:- 615 to 618/Del/2013 & 418/Del/2015 23. The Ld.DR for the Revenue on the other hand, placed strong reliance on the orders of the authorities below and stressed that it was notional loss on the loan received and hence, it was a capital loss. 24. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the recor…

M/S. C- 1 India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 615/DEL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Oct 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla & Dr. B.R.R.Kumarआयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 615 To 618/Del/2013 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2005-06, 2007-08 To 2009-10 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" C-1 India Pvt.Ltd., D-5, Defence Colony, New Delhi. …...........अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan-Aabcc4078L Vs Acit, Central Circle-13, …………. ू"यथ" / Respondent New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153CSection 271(1)(c)

…the order of Assessing Officer. 22. The case of the assessee before us is that the loss suffered by the assessee was an item of expenditure to be allowed u/s 37(1) of the Act. In this regard, reliance was placed on the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble [2009] 312 ITR 254(SC) and various other decisions. ITA Nos:- 615 to 618/Del/2013 & 418/Del/2015 23. The Ld.DR for the Revenue on the other hand, placed strong reliance on the orders of the authorities below and stressed that it was notional loss on the loan received and hence, it was a capital loss. 24. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the recor…