CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd.

171 Taxmann 156High Court2008#193 most cited

What is CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd. authority for?

The assessment order must clearly specify the reason for initiating penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and explicitly state whether it is for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Failure to identify the specific limb under which penalty is initiated renders the penalty unsustainable.

384

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,368 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Virgo Marketing · Section 271(1)(c) · initiation of penalty proceedings · assessment order · specific charge · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · levy of penalty · Section 274 · Section 270A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd.

Pinxinternational Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. I.T.O., Ward-11(2), Kolkata

Appeal is allowed

ITA 1479/KOL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Sept 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S.Godaraassessment Year: 2007-08 Pinx International Pvt. Dy. Commissioner Of बनाम Ltd., 16-S, Block A, New Income Tax, Circle-11(2), / Alipore, 2, Janen Goswami V/S. Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Sarani, Kolkata-700 053 Chowringhee Square, [Pan No. Aabcp 8604 M] Kolkata-700 069 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Jayanata Khavra, Jcit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 08-09-2020 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 08-09-2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2007-08 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata’S Order Dated 30.04.2019 Passed In Case No.2908/Cit(A)-4/2015-16 Imposing Penalty Of ₹42,914/- Involving Proceedings 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Heard Both The Parties. Case File(S) Perused. 2. The Assessee’S Identical Sole Substantive Grievance Raised In The Instant Appeal Challenges Correctness Of Both The Lower Authorities Action Imposing The Penalty In Issue Of ₹42,914/- U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act. It Is Indicated From The Penalty Notice(S) Dated 07.12.2009 That The Assessing Officer Did Not Specify As To Whether The Assessee Is Accused Of Concealment Of Particulars Of Any Taxable Income Or Had Furnished

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “ऐ” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “A” KOLKATA Before Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member and Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2007-08 Pinx International Pvt. Dy. Commissioner of बनाम Ltd., 16-S, Block A, New Income Tax, Circle-11(2), / Alipore, 2, Janen Goswami V/s. Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Sarani, Kolkata-700 053 Chowringhee Square, [PAN No. AABCP 8604 M] Kolkata-700 069 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Jayanata Khavra, JCIT-DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 08-0…

Shri Arup Kumar Bhowmick, Burdwan vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Burdwan

Appeal is allowed

ITA 171/KOL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godaraassessment Year:2014-15 Arup Kumar Bhowmick Income Tax Officer Ward- बनाम Nabadoi, Nr. Ramkrishna 1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, / School, Tikorhat, V/S. Kachari Road, Court Burdwan-713 102 Compound, Burdwan, Pin- [Pan No.Aefpb 3107 E] 713 101 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Shuvo Chakraborty, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Dhrubajyoti Roy, Jcit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 03-08-2020 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 03-08-2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2014-15 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Burdwan’S Dated 03.12.2019, Passed In Case No.19/ Cit(A)/Bwn/Ito,Wd-1(1)/2017-18 Upholding Assessing Officer’S Action Imposing Penalty Of ₹3,21,026/- Involving Proceedings U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Heard Shri Shuvo Chakraborty Representing Assessee & Shri Dhrubajyoti Ray, Senior Departmental Representative Appearing At The Revenue’S Behest. Case File Perused. 2. The Assessee’S Identical Sole Substantive Grievance Raised In The Instant Appeal Challenges Correctness Of Both The Lower Authorities Action Imposing The Penalty In Issue Of ₹3,21,026/- U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act. It Emerges From The Penalty Notice Dated 15.12.2016 That The Assessing Officer Did Not Specify As To Whether The Assessee Is

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “Virtual Court “D” KOLKATA Before Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice-President and Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member Assessment Year:2014-15 Arup Kumar Bhowmick Income Tax Officer Ward- बनाम Nabadoi, Nr. Ramkrishna 1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, / School, Tikorhat, V/s. Kachari Road, Court Burdwan-713 102 Compound, Burdwan, Pin- [PAN No.AEFPB 3107 E] 713 101 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Shuvo Chakraborty, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Dhrubajyoti Roy, JCIT-DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 03-08-2020 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 03-08-2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/…