CIT v. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd.

28 Taxmann.com 429Supreme Court of India2012#2280 most cited

What is CIT v. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd. authority for?

Club membership fees paid by a company for its employees are considered pure business expenses, allowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.

50

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd · 28 Taxmann.com 429 · SC · club membership fees · employees · business expense · Section 37 · allowable expenditure · welfare of employees

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd.

M/S Rebar Design & Detail Pv. Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, Corporate Range VI, Chennai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 319/CHNY/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Girish Agrawalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 319/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Rebar Design & Detail Pvt Dcit, Ltd., V. Cpc, 45, Chamiers Road, Bangalore. R A Puram, Chennai- 600 028. Pan: Aaecr-2348-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Abhishek Murali, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 01.06.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.06.2022

For Appellant: Shri. Abhishek Murali, CAFor Respondent: Shri. AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी. दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी "गर"श अ"वाल, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 319/CHNY/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/s. Rebar Design & Detail Pvt DCIT, Ltd., v. CPC, 45, Chamiers Road, Bangalore. R A Puram, Chennai- 600 028. PAN: AAECR-2348-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant by : Shri. Abhishek Murali, CA ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : Shri. AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT सुनवाई…

Ashwin Shetty, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 600/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2018-19 Shri Ashwin Shetty, The Assistant No. 63/A, 13Th Cross, Commissioner Of J.P. Nagar 3Rd Phase, Income Tax, Bangalore – 560 078. Cpc, Pan: Anaps7985B Vs. Bangalore. Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri S.N. Shyanbhag, Advocate : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 17-03-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 31-03-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 09.09.2021 U/S. 250 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Learned Commissioner Of Appeals Has Erred In Confirming The Addition Of Rs.16,11,013/-Being Belated Payment Of Employees Contribution Of Esi & Pf Paid Before Due Date For Filing The Return Of Income & An Amount Of Rs.18,362/- Being Club Expenses Incurred By The Employees Made By The A.O. Cpc In 143(1) Proceedings. 2. The Cit(A) Erred In Holding That The Amendment By Way Explanation 2 To Section 36(1) (Va) & Explanation 5 To The Section 43B Made In The Finance Act 2021 Has Retrospective Effect As Such The Decisions Relied On By The Appellant Are Not Applicable.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Shyanbhag, Advocate
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2018-19 Shri Ashwin Shetty, The Assistant No. 63/A, 13th Cross, Commissioner of J.P. Nagar 3rd Phase, Income Tax, Bangalore – 560 078. CPC, PAN: ANAPS7985B Vs. Bangalore. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri S.N. Shyanbhag, Advocate : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue by CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 17-03-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 31-03-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by assessee again…

Addl. CIT, Special Range-7, New Delhi vs. Rites Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7319/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh, Member Assessment Year: 2015-16 Addl. Cit, Vs. Rites Ltd., Special Range-7, Scope Building, New Delhi. Scope Minar, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi. Pan : Aaacr0830Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri R.S. Singhvi, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Atiq Ahmed, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 27.10.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 14.12.2021 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 23Rd August, 2018 Of The Cit(A)-38, New Delhi, Relating To Assessment Year 2015- 16. 2. Ground Of Appeal No.1 By The Revenue Reads As Under:- “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law In Deleting Disallowance Of Rs. 1,17,21,750/- U/S 14A Read With Rule 8D Ignoring The Mandatory Provision Of Rule 8D.”

For Appellant: Shri R.S. Singhvi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Atiq Ahmed, Sr. DR
Section 10(34)Section 14Section 14ASection 14A(2)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI (Through Virtual Hearing) BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KULDIP SINGH, MEMBER Assessment Year: 2015-16 Addl. CIT, Vs. Rites Ltd., Special Range-7, Scope Building, New Delhi. Scope Minar, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi. PAN : AAACR0830Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri R.S. Singhvi, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Atiq Ahmed, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 27.10.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 14.12.2021 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 23rd August, 2018 of the CIT(A)-38, New De…

Saf Yeast Co. P.Ltd., Mumba vs. ACIT CC-7(1), Mumbai

Accordingly, ground No. 1 & 2 raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1800/MUM/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2013-14 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Tax Cc-7(1), Vs. 419, Swastik Chambers, Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, Chembur, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400071. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aadcs 9080 J Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of Income 419, Swastik Chambers, Chembur, Vs. Tax Cc-7(1), Mumbai-400071. Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aadcs 9080 J Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of Income 419, Swastik Chambers, Chembur, Vs. Tax Cc-7(1), Mumbai-400071. Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aadcs 9080 J Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Mr. Hemant Chimanlal Leuwa, DR
Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “E” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Deputy Commissioner of Income M/s Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Tax CC-7(1), Vs. 419, Swastik Chambers, Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, Chembur, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400071. Mumbai-400020. PAN No. AADCS 9080 J Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/s Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner of Income 419, Swastik Chambers, Chembur, Vs. Tax CC-7(1), Mumbai-400071. Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. PAN No. AADCS…

Dy CIT - CC- 7(1), Mumbai vs. M/S. Saf Yeast Co.Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Accordingly, ground No. 1 & 2 raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1714/MUM/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2013-14 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Tax Cc-7(1), Vs. 419, Swastik Chambers, Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, Chembur, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400071. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aadcs 9080 J Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of Income 419, Swastik Chambers, Chembur, Vs. Tax Cc-7(1), Mumbai-400071. Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aadcs 9080 J Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of Income 419, Swastik Chambers, Chembur, Vs. Tax Cc-7(1), Mumbai-400071. Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aadcs 9080 J Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Mr. Hemant Chimanlal Leuwa, DR
Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “E” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Deputy Commissioner of Income M/s Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Tax CC-7(1), Vs. 419, Swastik Chambers, Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, Chembur, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400071. Mumbai-400020. PAN No. AADCS 9080 J Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/s Saf Yeast Co. Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner of Income 419, Swastik Chambers, Chembur, Vs. Tax CC-7(1), Mumbai-400071. Room No. 653, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400020. PAN No. AADCS…