CIT v. Umang Hiralal Thakur

42 Taxmann.com 194High Court2014#7457 most cited

What is CIT v. Umang Hiralal Thakur authority for?

An Assessing Officer cannot deviate from an accounting method accepted in prior years without demonstrating that the assessee is underreporting income and without providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. The choice of the project completion method for accounting is permissible even if other related concerns use the percentage completion method.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2024.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Umang Hiralal Thakur · section 145(1) · section 145(2) · project completion method · percentage completion method · accounting method · Assessing Officer · underreporting income · natural justice · audit

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Umang Hiralal Thakur

DCIT Central Circle-1, Vadodara vs. Darshnam Life Spaces Pvt Ltd, Vadodara

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 663/AHD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of Darshnam Life Spaces Pvt. Income Tax, Ltd., Central Circle-1, 3Rd Floor, Platinum Complex, Vs Vadodara Opp. Ganga Jamuna Hospital, Subhanpura, Vadodara-390023 [Pan No.:Aadcd2030M] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant By : None Respondent By : Shri Kamlesh Makwana, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing: 12.06.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28.06.2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue As Against The Appellate Order Dated 14.06.2023 Passed By Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 12, Ahmedabad Arising Out Of The Assessment Order Passed Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “The Act”) Relating To The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Revenue Are As Follows:-

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘C’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner of Darshnam Life Spaces Pvt. Income Tax, Ltd., Central Circle-1, 3rd Floor, Platinum Complex, Vs Vadodara Opp. Ganga Jamuna Hospital, Subhanpura, Vadodara-390023 [PAN No.:AADCD2030M] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing: 12.06.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronounce…