CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.

349 ITR 98High Court2012#59 most cited

What is CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. authority for?

When computing deduction under Section 10A, if communication or telecommunication expenses are excluded from export turnover, they must also be excluded from total turnover to maintain consistency and apply the ordinary meaning of 'turnover' in context.

818

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. · Section 10A · deduction u/s 10A · export turnover · total turnover · communication expenses · telecommunication expenses · exclusion from turnover · computation of deduction · consistency principle · Karnataka High Court

Also reported as

204 Taxmann 32117 Taxmann.com 100

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.

M/S Meritor L vs. India (P) Ltd., Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1231/BANG/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Oct 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. Abraham P. George & Shri. Vijaypal Raoi.T(Tp).A No.1231/Bang/2011 (Assessment Year : 2007-08) M/S. Meritor Lvs India(P) Ltd, No.69, A1- Ameen Towers, 3Rd Floor, Hosur Road, Near Lalbagh Main Road, Bangalore 560 027 .. Appellant Pan : Aabcm9623K V. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle -12(1), Bangalore .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Amit B. Jain, Ca Revenue By : Shri. J. P. S. Bindra, Cit - Dr Heard On : 12.10.2015 Pronounced On : 16.10.2015 O R D E R Per Abraham P. George: In This Appeal Filed By Assessee Directed Against An Assessment Order Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S.144C Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ In Short), It Has Filed A Set Of Concise Grounds In Lieu Of The Original Grounds Filed.

For Appellant: Shri. Amit B. Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri. J. P. S. Bindra, CIT - DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)

…n in Explanation 2 (iv) to Section 10A does not warrant such an interpretation. However in respect of parity between the export turnover and total turnover, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd [349 ITR 98], assessee has to succeed. We direct the AO / TPO to exclude what has been excluded from the export turnover from the total turnover also while computing deduction u/s.10A of the Act. Grounds 6 and 7 are treated as partly allowed for statistical purpose. 19. In so far as ground 8 is concerned, Ld. AR submitted that in view of the decision of Hon’b…