CIT v. T.S. PL. P. Chidambaram Chettiar

80 ITR 467Supreme Court of India1971#25686 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 341,001 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Judgments citing CIT v. T.S. PL. P. Chidambaram Chettiar

Shahnaj, Near Bherudanji Well vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Income Tax Office

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 712/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Dr Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Shanaj Vs The Ito W/O Shri Aslam Khan Ward-2, Churu, Near Bherudan Ji Well,Ward No. 22 Churu Sardarshahar,Churu – 331 403 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Fpmps 3570 D

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 50CSection 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR BEFORE Dr. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR MITHA LAL MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Smt. Shanaj Vs The ITO W/o Shri Aslam Khan Ward-2, Churu, Near Bherudan Ji Well,Ward No. 22 Churu Sardarshahar,Churu – 331 403 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN NO. FPMPS 3570 D Assessee By Shri Aman Saxena Advocate Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT-DR Revenue By Date of hearing 05/10/2024 Date of 01/01/2025 Pronouncement O R D E R PER: DR S. SEETHALAKSHMI , JM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 23-08-2024, National Faceless App…

Dy CIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs. M/S Leena Poower Tech Engineers P Ltd., Navi Mumbai

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 1313/MUM/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Us Is A Private Limited Company Stated To Be Engaged In The Business As 'Investment Company' In Column 10, Page 1, Of The Impugned Assessment Order. Its Assessment Under Section 143(3)

Section 143(3)Section 68

…t all vague or non-specific. 16. It would in this connection be advantageous to take note of some of the other judgment of this Court wherein the position of law on this aspect has been clearly enunciated. 17. In CIT v. T.S. PL. P. Chidambaram Chettiar [1971] 80 ITR 467 (SC), relied upon by Mr. Bhatnagar, the facts were quite similar to the facts in the present case. In that case, the father of the assessee, Palaniappa Chettiar, a money-lender had made various advances to one Nallathambi, a prominent landlord in Coimbatore District, on promissory notes. For the amounts due from him, Nallathambi had executed mortg…

M/S Veena Enterprises Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2517/DEL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Oct 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Jm Ita No. 2517/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 M/S Veena Enterprises Ltd., Vs Assistant Commissioner Of 81, Vigyan Vihar, Income Tax, Circle 17(1), New Delhi-110092 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacv3918K Assessee By : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. Sh. Rohit Garg, Fca Sh. Deepesh Jain, Ca & Sh. Udit Naresh, Adv. Revenue By: Sh. J. P. Chandrakar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.07.2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.10.2015 Order Per N.K. Saini, A.M. This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 22.01.2013 Of The Ld. Cit(A)-19, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. Sh. Rohit Garg, FCAFor Respondent: Sh. J. P. Chandrakar, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Sh. H. S. Sidhu, JM ITA No. 2517/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 M/s Veena Enterprises Ltd., Vs Assistant Commissioner of 81, Vigyan Vihar, Income Tax, Circle 17(1), New Delhi-110092 New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACV3918K Assessee by : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. Sh. Rohit Garg, FCA Sh. Deepesh Jain, CA & Sh. Udit Naresh, Adv. Revenue by: Sh. J. P. Chandrakar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 15.07.2015 Date of Pronouncement : 09.10.2015 ORDER PER N.K. SAINI, A.M. This is an appeal by the Assessee against the or…