CIT v. Suman Poddar
268 Taxmann 320Supreme Court of India2020#6035 most cited
What is CIT v. Suman Poddar authority for?
The Supreme Court dismisses an SLP challenging the Delhi High Court's view that tribunal findings based on record material do not require interference, particularly in cases involving bogus long-term capital gains from penny stocks where the assessee fails to establish genuineness of transactions.
19
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Suman Poddar · 268 Taxmann 320 · SC · bogus long term capital gain · section 10(38) · section 68 · penny stocks · onus of proof · genuineness of sale and purchase of shares · accommodation entry · assessment proceedings