CIT v. Suman Poddar

268 Taxmann 320Supreme Court of India2020#6035 most cited

What is CIT v. Suman Poddar authority for?

The Supreme Court dismisses an SLP challenging the Delhi High Court's view that tribunal findings based on record material do not require interference, particularly in cases involving bogus long-term capital gains from penny stocks where the assessee fails to establish genuineness of transactions.

19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Suman Poddar · 268 Taxmann 320 · SC · bogus long term capital gain · section 10(38) · section 68 · penny stocks · onus of proof · genuineness of sale and purchase of shares · accommodation entry · assessment proceedings

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Suman Poddar

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Visakhapatnam vs. Mattapalli Ramgopal, Visakhapatnam

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 66/VIZ/2021[20105-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam29 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.65/Viz/2021 & 66/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16) Asst.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. Mattapalli Ramgopal Circle-1(1) 25-8-246, Main Road Visakhapatnam Kurupam Market Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aarpw2133K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri I.Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

…आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम पीठ, धिशाखापटणम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM श्री दुव्वूरु आर एल रेड्डी, न्याधयक सदस्य एिं श्री एस बालाकृष्णन, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.65/Viz/2021 & 66/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16) Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mattapalli Ramgopal Circle-1(1) 25-8-246, Main Road Visakhapatnam Kurupam Market Visakhapatnam [PAN : AARPW2133K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओ…

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Visakhaptnam vs. Mattapalli Ramgopal, Visakhapatnam

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 65/VIZ/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam29 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.65/Viz/2021 & 66/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16) Asst.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. Mattapalli Ramgopal Circle-1(1) 25-8-246, Main Road Visakhapatnam Kurupam Market Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aarpw2133K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri I.Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

…आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम पीठ, धिशाखापटणम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM श्री दुव्वूरु आर एल रेड्डी, न्याधयक सदस्य एिं श्री एस बालाकृष्णन, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.65/Viz/2021 & 66/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16) Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mattapalli Ramgopal Circle-1(1) 25-8-246, Main Road Visakhapatnam Kurupam Market Visakhapatnam [PAN : AARPW2133K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओ…

CIT v. Suman Poddar (268 Taxmann 320) — Cited in 19 Judgments | BharatTax