CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows
73 Taxmann.com 241High Court2016#64 most cited
What is CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows authority for?
A penalty notice under section 271(1)(c) read with section 274 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if it fails to specify whether the penalty is for concealment of income or for furnishing incorrect particulars of income.
791
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. SSA's Emerald Meadows · section 271(1)(c) · section 274 · penalty notice · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · defective notice · vitiates penalty proceedings · Karnataka High Court
Also reported as
73 Taxmann 241