CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

73 Taxmann.com 241High Court2016#64 most cited

What is CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows authority for?

A penalty notice under section 271(1)(c) read with section 274 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if it fails to specify whether the penalty is for concealment of income or for furnishing incorrect particulars of income.

791

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. SSA's Emerald Meadows · section 271(1)(c) · section 274 · penalty notice · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · defective notice · vitiates penalty proceedings · Karnataka High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

Vijay Kedia (HUF), Jaipur vs. ACIT, Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1266/JPR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Jul 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 1266/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2008-09 M/S Vijay Kedia, Cuke A.C.I.T., 1307, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, Johari Vs. Central Circle-1, Bazar, Jaipur. Jaipur. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aabhv 6449 M Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri S.R. Sharma (Ca)& Shri R.K. Bhatra (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl.Cit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 19/07/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 30/07/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)- 1, Jaipur Dated 02/09/2019 For The A.Y. 2008-09, Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Taken. “1. That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Is Wrong, Unjust & Has Erred In Law In Not Accepting Plea Of The Appellant That The Notice Issued By The Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 Is Wrong & Bad In Law Inasmuch As It Did Not Specify In Which Limb Of Sec. 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 The Penalty Proceedings Has Been Initiated I.E. Whether For Concealment Of Income Or Furnishing Of Inaccurate Particulars Of Income.

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma (CA)&For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl.CIT)
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1266/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2008-09 M/s Vijay Kedia, cuke A.C.I.T., 1307, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, Johari Vs. Central Circle-1, Bazar, Jaipur. Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AABHV 6449 M vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri S.R. Sharma (CA)& Shri R.K. Bhatra (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls…

Sh. Satinder Pal Singh, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6454/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jul 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Kuldip Singh(Through Video Conferencing) Ita Nos. 6453, 6454 & 6455/Del/2016 (Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Sh. Satinder Pal Singh Vs. Acit, D-97, Defence Colony, Central Circle – 3, New Delhi – 110024 New Delhi Pan No. Aaaps 4461 K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By --None-- Revenue By Shri H. K. Chaudhary, Cit-D.R. Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2021 Order Per Bench: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Dated 30.09.2016 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-25, Delhi Relating To Assessment Years 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. 2. The Case File Reveals That There Was No Appearance On Behalf Of The Assessee In The Past. Even On The Date Of Hearing, None

Section 132Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA Nos. 6453, 6454 & 6455/Del/2016 (Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Sh. Satinder Pal Singh Vs. ACIT, D-97, Defence Colony, Central Circle – 3, New Delhi – 110024 New Delhi PAN No. AAAPS 4461 K (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by --None-- Revenue by Shri H. K. Chaudhary, CIT-D.R. Date of hearing: 12/07/2021 Date of Pronouncement: 20/07/2021 ORDER PER BENCH: These three appeals filed by the assessee are directed against…

Sh. Satinder Pal Singh, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6453/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jul 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Kuldip Singh(Through Video Conferencing) Ita Nos. 6453, 6454 & 6455/Del/2016 (Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Sh. Satinder Pal Singh Vs. Acit, D-97, Defence Colony, Central Circle – 3, New Delhi – 110024 New Delhi Pan No. Aaaps 4461 K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By --None-- Revenue By Shri H. K. Chaudhary, Cit-D.R. Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2021 Order Per Bench: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Dated 30.09.2016 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-25, Delhi Relating To Assessment Years 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. 2. The Case File Reveals That There Was No Appearance On Behalf Of The Assessee In The Past. Even On The Date Of Hearing, None

Section 132Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA Nos. 6453, 6454 & 6455/Del/2016 (Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Sh. Satinder Pal Singh Vs. ACIT, D-97, Defence Colony, Central Circle – 3, New Delhi – 110024 New Delhi PAN No. AAAPS 4461 K (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by --None-- Revenue by Shri H. K. Chaudhary, CIT-D.R. Date of hearing: 12/07/2021 Date of Pronouncement: 20/07/2021 ORDER PER BENCH: These three appeals filed by the assessee are directed against…

Villo Noshir Anklesaria, Pune vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 4, Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2281/PUN/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jun 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 2281/Pun/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Mrs. Villo Noshir Anklesaria Plot No.10/3, Sr. No.29, Dhunjibhoy & Sanas Compound, Nibm Road, Kondhwa, Pune-411 048. Pan : Aazpa3341F .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal Bhosale
Section 143(3)Section 253Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण “बी” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, PUNE (Through Virtual Court) BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 2281/PUN/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Mrs. Villo Noshir Anklesaria Plot No.10/3, Sr. No.29, Dhunjibhoy & Sanas Compound, NIBM Road, Kondhwa, Pune-411 048. PAN : AAZPA3341F .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/s. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4, Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Vitthal Bhosale सुनवाई की…