CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

73 Taxmann.com 248Supreme Court of India2016#48 most cited

What is CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows authority for?

A notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) is invalid if it fails to specify whether penalty proceedings are for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Such lack of specificity vitiates the penalty proceedings.

953

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2013 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows · section 274 · section 271(1)(c) · penalty notice validity · specific charge penalty · concealment of income · inaccurate particulars of income · vitiates penalty proceedings · Manjunatha Cotton

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

Ms Rajmal Lakhichand, Jalgaon vs. DCIT, Jalgaon

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1206/PUN/2023[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Sept 2024AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1206/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11 Ms. Rajmal Lakhichand, Vs. Dcit, Jalgaon. 169, Balaji Peth, Jalgaon- 425001. Pan : Aacfr8609L Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Nikhil Pathak Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak : Date Of Hearing : 27.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.09.2024 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 20.09.2023 Passed By Ld Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The Appellant Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “The Grounds Of Appeal Stated Below Are Without Prejudice To Each Other. 1) That The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Penalty Of Rs.62,95,800 U/S. 271(1)(C) Of The Act. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Said Penalty Be Cancelled. 2) Gross Profit Addition

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Pathak
Section 142Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1206/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11 Ms. Rajmal Lakhichand, Vs. DCIT, Jalgaon. 169, Balaji Peth, Jalgaon- 425001. PAN : AACFR8609L Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Nikhil Pathak Revenue by Shri Sourabh Nayak : Date of hearing : 27.06.2024 Date of pronouncement : 10.09.2024 आदेश / ORDER PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 20.09.2023 passed by LD CIT(A)/NFAC for the assessment…

Ram Kumar Daitapati, Puri vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward, Puri

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 248/CTK/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicialassessment Year : 2010-2011 2011 Ram Ram Kumar Kumar Daitapati, Daitapati, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward, Puri Income Tax Officer, Ward, Puri Matimandap Sah Matimandap Sahi, Nabata Khan Lane, Po/Ps-Dist Dist: Puri Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aeppd 2413 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Adv P.K.Mishra, Adv Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 31/0 07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 31/0 /07/2024 O R D E R This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Aga This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld Inst The Order Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Nfac, Delhi Dated 13.2.2024 In Appeal No. In Appeal No.Cit(A),Bhubaneswar- 2/10130/2019 2/10130/2019-20 For The Assessment Year 2010-2011. 2. Shri P.K.Mishra, P.K.Mishra, Ld Ar Appeared For The Assessee. Shri The Assessee. Shri Sanjkay Kumar, Ld Cit Dr Kumar, Ld Cit Dr Represented On Behalf Of The Revenue. Represented On Behalf Of The Revenue.

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK ‘SMC’ BENCH, CUTTACK , CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2010-2011 2011 Ram Ram Kumar Kumar Daitapati, Daitapati, Vs. Income Tax officer, Ward, Puri Income Tax officer, Ward, Puri Matimandap Sah Matimandap Sahi, Nabata Khan Lane, PO/PS-Dist Dist: Puri PAN/GIR No PAN/GIR No.AEPPD 2413 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : Shri P.K.Mishra, Adv P.K.Mishra, Adv Revenue by : Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT Sanjay Kumar, CIT DR D…