CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

73 Taxmann.com 248Supreme Court of India2016#48 most cited

What is CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows authority for?

A notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) is invalid if it fails to specify whether penalty proceedings are for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Such lack of specificity vitiates the penalty proceedings.

953

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2013 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows · section 274 · section 271(1)(c) · penalty notice validity · specific charge penalty · concealment of income · inaccurate particulars of income · vitiates penalty proceedings · Manjunatha Cotton

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

ACIT 15(2)(1), Mumbai vs. Kimplas Piping Systems Ltd, Nashik

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1187/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice- & Shri Pawan Singhacit-15(2)(1) M/S Kimplas Piping Systems Ltd. Room No. 357, B-20, Additional Midc Area, 3Rd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Ambad, Nashik-422010. M.K. Road, Pan: Aaacg3404H Vs. Mumbai-400020. Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Saurabh Kumar Rai (Dr) Respondent By : Shri Nishit Gandhi (Ar) Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.05.2019 Order Under Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act Per Pawan Singh; 1. This Appeal By Revenue Under Section 253 Of Income-Tax Act (‘Act’) Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Kumar Rai (DR)For Respondent: Shri Nishit Gandhi (AR)
Section 143(3)Section 253Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 35

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ACIT-15(2)(1) M/s Kimplas Piping Systems Ltd. Room No. 357, B-20, Additional MIDC Area, 3rd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Ambad, Nashik-422010. M.K. Road, PAN: AAACG3404H Vs. Mumbai-400020. Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Saurabh Kumar Rai (DR) Respondent by : Shri Nishit Gandhi (AR) Date of Hearing : 16.04.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 22.05.2019 ORDER UNDER SECTION 254(1)OF INCOME TAX ACT PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER; 1. This appeal by revenue under section 253 of Income-…

Sri Sanjay Prasad, West Singhbhum vs. DCIT C.C.-1, Ranchi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 158/RAN/2018[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 May 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargआयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.158/Ran/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Sri Sanjay Prasad, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-1, D/Lg-70, Choudhary Ranchi Madhusudan Complex, Dimna Road, Mango, Wests Singhbhum-831012 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Ailpp 0209 R (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By :Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.K.Mondal, Acit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/05/2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 21/05/2019 आदेश / O R D E R This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patna-3, Dated 26.03.2018 For The Assessment Year 2009-2010. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In This Appeal Is That The Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Assessing Officer In Levying Penalty U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Act Of Rs.1,32,118/-. 3. At The Outset, Ld Authorised Representative Of The Assessee Filed Before Us Copy Of Notice Issued U/S.274 R.W.S.271(1)(C) Of The Act Dated 31.12.2011, Copy Of Which Is Placed On Record & Pointed Out Therefrom That In The Said Notice, The Assessing Officer Has Stated As Under: "Whereas In The Course Of Proceedings Before Me For The Assessment Year 2009-10, It Appears To Me That You:-

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 274w

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, “एस.एम.सी” न्यायपीठ,रााँची IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, RANCHI श्री चन्द्र मोहन गगग, न्द्याययक सदस्य के समऺ । BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं./ITA No.158/RAN/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Sri Sanjay Prasad, Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, D/LG-70, Choudhary Ranchi Madhusudan Complex, Dimna Road, Mango, Wests Singhbhum-831012 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AILPP 0209 R (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee by :Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri P.K.Mon…

Sri Vijay Prasad, West Singhbhum vs. DCIT C.C.-1, Ranchi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 155/RAN/2018[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 May 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargआयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.155/Ran/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009) Sri Vijay Prasad, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-1, 2Rf/68, Russi Modi Gate, Ranchi Near Sbi Atm, Noamundi, West Singhbhum-833221 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Ailpp 0228 L (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By :Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.K.Mondal, Acit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/05/2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 21/05/2019 आदेश / O R D E R This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patna-3, Dated 16.03.2018 For The Assessment Year 2008-2009. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In This Appeal Is That The Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Assessing Officer In Levying Penalty U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Act Of Rs.73,714/-. 3. At The Outset, Ld Authorised Representative Of The Assessee Filed Before Us Copy Of Notice Issued U/S.274 R.W.S.271(1)(C) Of The Act Dated 28.12.2011, Copy Of Which Is Placed On Record & Pointed Out Therefrom That In The Said Notice, The Assessing Officer Has Stated As Under: "Whereas In The Course Of Proceedings Before Me For The Assessment Year 2008-09, It Appears To Me That You:- ................

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 274w

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, “एस.एम.सी” न्यायपीठ,रााँची IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, RANCHI श्री चन्द्र मोहन गगग, न्द्याययक सदस्य के समऺ । BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं./ITA No.155/RAN/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009) Sri Vijay Prasad, Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, 2RF/68, Russi Modi Gate, Ranchi Near SBI ATM, Noamundi, West Singhbhum-833221 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AILPP 0228 L (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee by :Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(D…

Sri Bengali Prasad, West Singhbhum vs. DCIT Central Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 152/RAN/2018[06-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 May 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargआयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.152/Ran/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2006-2007) Sri Bengali Prasad, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-1, Noamundi, Ranchi West Singhbhum-833221 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Ainpp 3529 J (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By :Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.K.Mondal, Acit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/05/2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 21/05/2019 आदेश / O R D E R This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patna-3, Dated 27.03.2018 For The Assessment Year 2006-2007. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In This Appeal Is That The Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Assessing Officer In Levying Penalty U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Act Of Rs.91,155/-. 3. At The Outset, Ld Authorised Representative Of The Assessee Filed Before Us Copy Of Notice Issued U/S.274 R.W.S.271(1)(C) Of The Act Dated 28.12.2011, Copy Of Which Is Placed On Record & Pointed Out Therefrom That In The Said Notice, The Assessing Officer Has Stated As Under: "Whereas In The Course Of Proceedings Before Me For The Assessment Year 2006-07, It Appears To Me That You:- ................

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 274w

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, “एस.एम.सी” न्यायपीठ,रााँची IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, RANCHI श्री चन्द्र मोहन गगग, न्द्याययक सदस्य के समऺ । BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं./ITA No.152/RAN/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2006-2007) Sri Bengali Prasad, Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, Noamundi, Ranchi West Singhbhum-833221 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AINPP 3529 J (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee by :Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing…