CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

73 Taxmann.com 248Supreme Court of India2016#48 most cited

What is CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows authority for?

A notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) is invalid if it fails to specify whether penalty proceedings are for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Such lack of specificity vitiates the penalty proceedings.

953

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2013 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows · section 274 · section 271(1)(c) · penalty notice validity · specific charge penalty · concealment of income · inaccurate particulars of income · vitiates penalty proceedings · Manjunatha Cotton

Also reported as

242 Taxmann 180

Sections most often in play

Section 274Section 271(1)(c)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 143(2)Section 271AABSection 132(4)

Issues it is cited on

section 271(l)section 271(l)(c)furnishing inaccurate particulars of incomepenalty proceedings initiatedsection 274furnishing inaccurate particularssection 271aabconcealment of incomepenalty u/s 271(1)(c)penalty under section 271(1)(c)section 271(1)levy of penalty

Judgments citing CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

Mr. Parasmal Jain, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), Chennai

In the result, Appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3304/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Manu Kumar Giri

For Respondent: Ms. Gouthami

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ’बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI सु"ी प"ावती एस, लेखा सद" के सम" "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं BEFORE MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.3303 & 3304/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 PARASMAL JAIN, v. ACIT, Central Circle 3(1), No. 75, Prince Paradise, Jermiah CHENNAI Road, Vepery, TAMIL NADU-600034 Tamil Nadu-600007 [PAN: AIKPJ 9545 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Mr. B. Ramakrishnan, अपीलाथ" क ओर से/ Assessee by F.C.A. ""यथ" क ओर से /Responde…

Mr. Parasmal Jain, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), Chennai

In the result, Appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3303/CHNY/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jan 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Manu Kumar Giri

For Respondent: Ms. Gouthami

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ’बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI सु"ी प"ावती एस, लेखा सद" के सम" "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं BEFORE MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.3303 & 3304/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 PARASMAL JAIN, v. ACIT, Central Circle 3(1), No. 75, Prince Paradise, Jermiah CHENNAI Road, Vepery, TAMIL NADU-600034 Tamil Nadu-600007 [PAN: AIKPJ 9545 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Mr. B. Ramakrishnan, अपीलाथ" क ओर से/ Assessee by F.C.A. ""यथ" क ओर से /Responde…

Gopal Banik, Kolkata vs. PCIT(Central), Kolkata -2, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1430/KOL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Year: 2019-20 Gopal Banik…….…………..……..……….………….……….……….……Appellant 20, Apc Road, Kol- 700009.. [Pan: Aegpb1186E] Vs. Pcit (Central)-2, Kolkata…………………………..…….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri K K Khemka, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Sandeep Kumar Mehta, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 05, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 21, 2026 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 29.11.2024 Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2020–21. 2. The Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee With A Delay Of 174 Days & The Assessee Has Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of The Delay. After Going Over The Said Affidavit, We Find Sufficient Reasons Behind The Delay & Consequently, The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Hereby Condoned & We Proceed To Dispose Of The Appeal On Merits.

Section 132Section 250Section 270ASection 270A(1)Section 270A(7)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 69A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2019-20 Gopal Banik…….…………..……..……….………….……….……….……Appellant 20, APC Road, Kol- 700009.. [PAN: AEGPB1186E] vs. PCIT (Central)-2, Kolkata…………………………..…….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri K K Khemka, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Sandeep Kumar Mehta, Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : January 05, 2026 Date of pronouncing the order : Janu…

Axis Bank Limited, Ahmedabad vs. The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1125/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 1121,1122,1123,1124 & 1125/AHD/2025 Assessment Years: 2011-12,2012-13,2013-14,2014-15 & 2015-16 Axis Bank Limited, Assistant Commissioner of Trishul, 3rd Floor Opp. Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), Samtheshwar Mahadev Near Ahmedabad - 380015 Law Garden, Ellisbridge, Vs. Ahmedabad – 380006 [PAN –AAACU2414K] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate & Shri Kushal Fofaria, ARs Revenue by Shri Sher Singh, CIT. DR Date of He…

Axis Bank Limited, Ahmedabad vs. The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1124/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 1121,1122,1123,1124 & 1125/AHD/2025 Assessment Years: 2011-12,2012-13,2013-14,2014-15 & 2015-16 Axis Bank Limited, Assistant Commissioner of Trishul, 3rd Floor Opp. Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), Samtheshwar Mahadev Near Ahmedabad - 380015 Law Garden, Ellisbridge, Vs. Ahmedabad – 380006 [PAN –AAACU2414K] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate & Shri Kushal Fofaria, ARs Revenue by Shri Sher Singh, CIT. DR Date of He…

Axis Bank Limited, Ahmedabad vs. The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1123/AHD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 1121,1122,1123,1124 & 1125/AHD/2025 Assessment Years: 2011-12,2012-13,2013-14,2014-15 & 2015-16 Axis Bank Limited, Assistant Commissioner of Trishul, 3rd Floor Opp. Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), Samtheshwar Mahadev Near Ahmedabad - 380015 Law Garden, Ellisbridge, Vs. Ahmedabad – 380006 [PAN –AAACU2414K] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate & Shri Kushal Fofaria, ARs Revenue by Shri Sher Singh, CIT. DR Date of He…

Axis Bank Limited, Ahmedabad vs. The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1122/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 1121,1122,1123,1124 & 1125/AHD/2025 Assessment Years: 2011-12,2012-13,2013-14,2014-15 & 2015-16 Axis Bank Limited, Assistant Commissioner of Trishul, 3rd Floor Opp. Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), Samtheshwar Mahadev Near Ahmedabad - 380015 Law Garden, Ellisbridge, Vs. Ahmedabad – 380006 [PAN –AAACU2414K] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate & Shri Kushal Fofaria, ARs Revenue by Shri Sher Singh, CIT. DR Date of He…

Axis Bank Limited, Ahmedabad vs. The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1121/AHD/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 1121,1122,1123,1124 & 1125/AHD/2025 Assessment Years: 2011-12,2012-13,2013-14,2014-15 & 2015-16 Axis Bank Limited, Assistant Commissioner of Trishul, 3rd Floor Opp. Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), Samtheshwar Mahadev Near Ahmedabad - 380015 Law Garden, Ellisbridge, Vs. Ahmedabad – 380006 [PAN –AAACU2414K] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate & Shri Kushal Fofaria, ARs Revenue by Shri Sher Singh, CIT. DR Date of He…

Tahir Khan, Jhansi vs. Income Tax Officer-2(3)(1), Jhansi

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 468/AGR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 292BSection 56(2)(vii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 Tahir Khan, 136, Toriya Narsingh Vs. Income-tax Officer, Rao, Jhansi (UP). Ward 2(3)(1), Jhansi. PAN : AJXPK8333L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Anurag Sinha, Advocate Department by Sh. Sahilendra Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of hearing 16.12.2025 Date of pronouncement 15.01.2026 ORDER PER : SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been preferred by assessee against the impugned order dated 13.08.2025 passed in Appeal No…

Ganesh Ram Dokania, Banka vs. ACIT, Cir-2, Patna

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 238/PAT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Years: 2014-15 Ganesh Ram Dokania………..……..………………….……….……….……Appellant Dokania Market, Aliganj, Bihar-813102.. [Pan: Aadfg1795P] Vs. Acit, Circle-2, Patna…….………...…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. A H Chowdhury, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 17, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 08, 2026 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 27.03.2025 Of The Cit(A)-3, Patna (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014–15. 2. Facts In Brief Are That The Assessee Is Engaged In Real Estate Business & The Assessee Filed Return Of Income On 15.11.2016 In Response To Notice U/S 153A Of The Act By Declaring Total Income Of Rs.31,56,350/-. Notice U/S. 143(2) Of The Act Was Issued & Subsequently, Assessment U/S. 153A/144 Was Completed At A Total Income Of Rs.25,67,79,232/- Wherein The Assessing Officer Imposed Penalty U/S. 271Aab Of The Act At Rs. 1,60,00,000/- On Undisclosed Income.

Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH-PATNA VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member Assessment Years: 2014-15 Ganesh Ram Dokania………..……..………………….……….……….……Appellant Dokania Market, Aliganj, Bihar-813102.. [PAN: AADFG1795P] vs. ACIT, Circle-2, Patna…….………...…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv., appeared on behalf of the appellant. Md. A H Chowdhury, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : December 17, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : January 08, 2026…

Visakhapatnam Industrial Water Supply Company Limited, Visakhapatnam vs. DCIT, Circle-5(1), Visakhapatnam

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 657/VIZ/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 657/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2012-13) Visakhapatnam Industrial Water V. Dy. Cit – Circle – 5(1) Supply Company Limited Visakhapatnam Gvmc Room No.204 Tenneti Bhavan, Asilmetta Junction Visakhapatnam – 530002 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aabcv2240H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम पीठ, धिशाखापटणम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM “DIVISION” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM श्री संदीप धसंह करहैल, न्याधयक सदस्य एिं श्री ओंकारेश्वर धिदारा लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष, BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 657/VIZ/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2012-13) Visakhapatnam Industrial Water v. Dy. CIT – Circle – 5(1) Supply Company Limited Visakhapatnam GVMC Room No.204 Tenneti Bhavan, Asilmetta Junction Visakhapatnam – 530002 Andhra Pradesh [PAN: AABCV2240H] (अपीलार्थी…

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 vs. Chetan Gupta

The appeal is dismissed on this ground

ITA/741/2025HC Delhi15 Dec 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

Section 260ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…ITA 741/2025 Page 1 of 5 $~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 15.12.2025 + ITA 741/2025 & CM APPL. 78386/2025 (condn of delay of 1100 days in re-filing) PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 .....Appellant Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, SSC and Mr Anant Mann, JSC. versus CHETAN GUPTA…

Vishal Osatwal, Kolkata vs. D.C.I.T., Circle - 29(1), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1217/KOL/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Dec 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Year: 2014-15 Vishal Osatwal………………..……..………………….……….……….……Appellant Ground Floor, 34/1U, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kol – 700019. [Pan: Aanpo2583R] Vs. Dcit, Circle-29(1), Kolkata………...…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri S B Chakraborthy, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 01, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 10, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 01.05.2025 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014–15. 2. Facts In Brief Are That The Assessee Had Filed His Return Of Income For The A.Y. 2014-15 On 30.07.2014 Declaring A Total Income Of Rs.17,62,746/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny & During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, The Assessee Filed Revised Computation Of Income Offering Additional Income Of Rs.74,62,846/- Being Ltcg Claimed As Exempt In The Original Return Of Income. The Assessment U/S. 143(3) Of The Act Was Completed On 20-10-2016 Determining The Assessee'S Total Income At Rs.92,97,450/- By Making Addition Of Rs.74,62,846/- On Account Of Disallowance Of Ltcg & Disallowance Of Legal Expenses Of Rs. 3,809/-. In Respect Of Both These Vishal Osatwal Additions, The Assessing Officer Also Initiated Penalty Proceedings U/S. 271(1)(C) Of The Act.

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2014-15 Vishal Osatwal………………..……..………………….……….……….……Appellant Ground Floor, 34/1U, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kol – 700019. [PAN: AANPO2583R] vs. DCIT, Circle-29(1), Kolkata………...…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, FCA, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri S B Chakraborthy, Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : December 01, 2025 D…

Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Circle 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5790/MUM/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Dec 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rahul Chaudhary & Shri Prabhash Shankareverest Kanto Cylinder V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of Ltd. बनाम Income Tax, Circle – 3(4), 204,Raheja Centre, Free World Trade Centre 1, Cuffe Press Journal Marg, Parade, Mumbai – 400005, Nariman Point, Mumbai – Maharashtra 400 021, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaace0836F Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Shekhar Gupta,ARFor Respondent: Shri Hemanshu Joshi, (Sr.DR)
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Everest Kanto Cylinder v/s. Deputy Commissioner of Ltd. बनाम Income Tax, Circle – 3(4), 204,Raheja Centre, Free World Trade Centre 1, Cuffe Press Journal Marg, Parade, Mumbai – 400005, Nariman Point, Mumbai – Maharashtra 400 021, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAACE0836F Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant by : Shri Shekhar Gupta,AR Respondent by : Shri Hemanshu Joshi, (Sr.DR) Date of Hearing 12.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement 10.12.2…

Brij Gopal Construction Company (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3, Delhi

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 4800/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M Balaganesh & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 1Section 143Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(2)(a)

…1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 Brij Gopal Construction Vs ACIT, CC-3, Co. Pvt. Ltd., Delhi. A-7/2, Shivaji Apartment, Sector-14, Rohini, New Delhi-110085. PAN: AADCB 7702 J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Shri Gautam Jain, Adv.; Assessee represented by Shri Lalit Mohan, CA; & Sh. Ankit Kumar Adv. Department represented by Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. DR Date of hearing 13.11.2025 28.11.2025 Date of pronouncement O R D E R PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JM: The instant appeal, preferred by the asse…

Janseva Majoor Sahakari Sanshtha Maryadit, Mahim vs. ITO 22(1)(6), Lower Parel, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5752/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Mr. Piyush ChhachedFor Respondent: 12/11/2025
Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Janseva Majoor Sahakari ITO 22(1)(6), Sanshtha Maryadit, Piramal Chambers, Lower Parel, Vs. Room No. 1 Talmajlaopp Vadke Mumbai-400012. House, T H Kataria Marg, Mahim, Mumbai-400016. PAN NO. AADFJ 0626 J Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Mr. Piyush Chhached : Ms. Kavitha Kaushik, Sr. DR Revenue by : 12/11/2025 Date of Hearing : 25/11/2025 Date of pronouncement ORDER PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM This appeal by the assessee is directed again…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs. Nevales Networks Private Limited, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4827/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhailassessment Year : 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-14(1)(1), M/S. Nevales Networks Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 432, 4Th Floor, The Capital, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Level 7, Plot-C70, M.K.Road, G Block, Mumbai-400020. Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. Pan : Aadcn1748A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Piyush Chhajed Revenue By : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui

For Appellant: Shri Piyush ChhajedFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “B” BENCH : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2013-14 DCIT, Circle-14(1)(1), M/s. Nevales Networks Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 432, 4th Floor, The Capital, Aayakar Bhavan, vs. Level 7, Plot-C70, M.K.Road, G Block, Mumbai-400020. Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. PAN : AADCN1748A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Piyush Chhajed Revenue by : Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui Date of Hearing : 06-11-2025 Date of Pronouncement : 17-11-2025 O R D E R PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV,…

Ujjal Sinha, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(1), Kolkata

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1935/KOL/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.1931, 1932, 1934 & 1935/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13 & 2012-13 Ujjal Sinha……………….……..……………………….……….……….……Appellant 57/3, Ballygunge Circular Road, Ballygunge S.O, Kol- 700019.. [Pan: Aeips4499F] Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata….……..……………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Lata Goyal, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Sanat Kr. Raha, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 28, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 13, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 05.08.25, 05.08.25, 04.08.25 & 04.08.25 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”] Confirming Penalty U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act Levied By The Assessing Officer. Since The Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order.

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member ITA Nos.1931, 1932, 1934 & 1935/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13 & 2012-13 Ujjal Sinha……………….……..……………………….……….……….……Appellant 57/3, Ballygunge Circular Road, Ballygunge S.O, Kol- 700019.. [PAN: AEIPS4499F] vs. DCIT, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata….……..……………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Lata Goyal, CA, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Sanat Kr. Raha, CIT-DR…

Ujjal Sinha, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(1), Kolkata

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1934/KOL/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.1931, 1932, 1934 & 1935/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13 & 2012-13 Ujjal Sinha……………….……..……………………….……….……….……Appellant 57/3, Ballygunge Circular Road, Ballygunge S.O, Kol- 700019.. [Pan: Aeips4499F] Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata….……..……………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Lata Goyal, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Sanat Kr. Raha, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 28, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 13, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 05.08.25, 05.08.25, 04.08.25 & 04.08.25 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”] Confirming Penalty U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act Levied By The Assessing Officer. Since The Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order.

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member ITA Nos.1931, 1932, 1934 & 1935/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13 & 2012-13 Ujjal Sinha……………….……..……………………….……….……….……Appellant 57/3, Ballygunge Circular Road, Ballygunge S.O, Kol- 700019.. [PAN: AEIPS4499F] vs. DCIT, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata….……..……………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Lata Goyal, CA, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Sanat Kr. Raha, CIT-DR…

Ujjal Sinha, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(1), Kolkata

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1932/KOL/2025[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2025AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.1931, 1932, 1934 & 1935/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13 & 2012-13 Ujjal Sinha……………….……..……………………….……….……….……Appellant 57/3, Ballygunge Circular Road, Ballygunge S.O, Kol- 700019.. [Pan: Aeips4499F] Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata….……..……………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Lata Goyal, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Sanat Kr. Raha, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 28, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 13, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 05.08.25, 05.08.25, 04.08.25 & 04.08.25 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”] Confirming Penalty U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act Levied By The Assessing Officer. Since The Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order.

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member ITA Nos.1931, 1932, 1934 & 1935/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13 & 2012-13 Ujjal Sinha……………….……..……………………….……….……….……Appellant 57/3, Ballygunge Circular Road, Ballygunge S.O, Kol- 700019.. [PAN: AEIPS4499F] vs. DCIT, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata….……..……………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Lata Goyal, CA, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Sanat Kr. Raha, CIT-DR…